Traffic-Aware Relay Node Deployment: Maximizing Lifetime for Data Collection Wireless Sensor Networks

Wireless sensor networks have been widely used for ambient data collection in diverse environments. While in many such networks the nodes are randomly deployed in massive quantity, there is a broad range of applications advocating manual deployment. A typical example is structure health monitoring, where the sensors have to be placed at critical locations to fulfill civil engineering requirements. The raw data collected by the sensors can then be forwarded to a remote base station (the sink) through a series of relay nodes. In the wireless communication context, the operation time of a battery-limited relay node depends on its traffic volume and communication range. Hence, although not bounded by the civil-engineering-like requirements, the locations of the relay nodes have to be carefully planned to achieve the maximum network lifetime. The deployment has to not only ensure connectivity between the data sources and the sink, but also accommodate the heterogeneous traffic flows from different sources and the dominating many-to-one traffic pattern. Inspired by the uniqueness of such application scenarios, in this paper, we present an in-depth study on the traffic-aware relay node deployment problem. We develop optimal solutions for the simple case of one source node, both with single and multiple traffic flows. We show however that the general form of the deployment problem is difficult, and the existing only connectivity-guaranteed solutions cannot be directly applied here. We then transform our problem into a generalized version of the Euclidean Steiner Minimum Tree problem (ESMT). Nevertheless, we face further challenges as its solution is in continuous space and may yield fractional numbers of relay nodes, where simple rounding of the solution can lead to poor performance. We thus develop algorithms for discrete relay node assignment, together with local adjustments that yield high-quality practical solutions. Our solution has been evaluated through both numerical analysis and ns-2 simulations and compared with state-of-the-art approaches. The results show that for all test cases where the continuous space optimal solution can be computed within acceptable time frames, the network lifetime achieved by our solution is very close to the upper bound of the optimal solution (the difference is less than 13.5 percent). Moreover, it achieves up to 6-14 times improvement over the existing traffic-oblivious strategies.

[1]  Divyakant Agrawal,et al.  Power aware routing for sensor databases , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[2]  Qun Li,et al.  Online power-aware routing in wireless Ad-hoc networks , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[3]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Design Guidelines for Maximizing Lifetime and Avoiding Energy Holes in Sensor Networks with Uniform Distribution and Uniform Reporting , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[4]  Erik D. Demaine,et al.  Deploying sensor networks with guaranteed capacity and fault tolerance , 2005, MobiHoc '05.

[5]  Andreas Willig,et al.  Protocols and Architectures for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005 .

[6]  S. M. Heemstra de Groot,et al.  Power-aware routing in mobile ad hoc networks , 1998, MobiCom '98.

[7]  Satyajayant Misra,et al.  Fault-Tolerant Relay Node Placement in Wireless Sensor Networks: Problems and Algorithms , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[8]  Samir Khuller,et al.  Relay Placement for Higher Order Connectivity in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[9]  Satyajayant Misra,et al.  Constrained Relay Node Placement in Wireless Sensor Networks to Meet Connectivity and Survivability Requirements , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[10]  Lui Sha,et al.  Design and analysis of an MST-based topology control algorithm , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Jennifer C. Hou,et al.  Localized topology control algorithms for heterogeneous wireless networks , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[12]  Hossam S. Hassanein,et al.  Relay node deployment strategies in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks: multiple-hop communication case , 2005, 2005 Second Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2005. IEEE SECON 2005..

[13]  Prasant Mohapatra,et al.  Power conservation and quality of surveillance in target tracking sensor networks , 2004, MobiCom '04.

[14]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Investigation concerning structural health monitoring of an instrumented cable-stayed bridge , 2009 .

[15]  Ram Ramanathan,et al.  Topology control of multihop wireless networks using transmit power adjustment , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[16]  Yinyu Ye,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Minimizing a Sum of Euclidean Norms with Applications , 1997, SIAM J. Optim..

[17]  Guoliang Xue,et al.  Computing the Minimum Cost Pipe Network Interconnecting One Sink and Many Sources , 1999, SIAM J. Optim..

[18]  Errol L. Lloyd,et al.  Relay Node Placement in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[19]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Energy conserving routing in wireless ad-hoc networks , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[20]  Matt Welsh,et al.  Fidelity and yield in a volcano monitoring sensor network , 2006, OSDI '06.

[21]  Li Li,et al.  Distributed topology control for power efficient operation in multihop wireless ad hoc networks , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[22]  Wendi Heinzelman,et al.  Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  Guohui Lin,et al.  Steiner Tree Problem with Minimum Number of Steiner Points and Bounded Edge-Length , 1999, Inf. Process. Lett..

[24]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Prolonging sensor network lifetime with energy provisioning and relay node placement , 2005, 2005 Second Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2005. IEEE SECON 2005..

[25]  Miodrag Potkonjak,et al.  Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[26]  John A. Stankovic,et al.  LUSTER: wireless sensor network for environmental research , 2007, SenSys '07.