Partitioning techniques for cellular manufacturing

Publisher Summary In this chapter, cellular manufacturing is introduced with its concepts, uses, and solution methodologies. A description of various traditional solution methodologies is given. In addition, the reasons for the need to analyze the solution of the group technology (GT) problem simultaneously with the machine assignment problem are discussed in the chapter. The techniques that allow this simultaneous solution are more effective in delivering good GT solutions. New solution techniques that take into consideration the effect of operation sequences while solving the GT machine assignment problem directly are discussed in the chapter. These results illustrate the effect of operation sequences on the machine assignment and demonstrate the improvement in the GT assignment. GT is an organizational technique that seeks to improve manufacturing productivity by finding part-families and machine cells that form self-sufficient units of production with a certain amount of functional autonomy that results in easier control. Cellular manufacturing (CM) is the application of GT principles to production. The chapter details the traditional solution methodologies—graph-based techniques, matrix techniques, integer programming techniques, and constraints considered in group technology. In the case of graph representations, the machines are denoted by nodes, the connection between the machines is denoted by arcs (edges), and the weights are the number of parts moving from one machine to another. When studying the GT problem, researchers have attempted to consider several constraints on the final solution. This chapter discusses some of these constraints.

[1]  Jerry C. Wei,et al.  Commonality analysis: A linear cell clustering algorithm for group technology , 1989 .

[2]  S. W. Hadley,et al.  A Gomory-Hu cut tree representation of a netlist partitioning problem , 1990 .

[3]  Anthony Vannelli,et al.  Strategic subcontracting for efficient disaggregated manufacturing , 1986 .

[4]  Divakar Rajamani,et al.  Integrated design of cellular manufacturing systems in the presence of alternative process plans , 1990 .

[5]  Warren J. Boe,et al.  A close neighbour algorithm for designing cellular manufacturing systems , 1991 .

[6]  Sunderesh S. Heragu,et al.  Group Technology and Cellular Manufacturing , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[7]  R. M. Mattheyses,et al.  A Linear-Time Heuristic for Improving Network Partitions , 1982, 19th Design Automation Conference.

[8]  K. Y. Tam,et al.  An operation sequence based similarity coefficient for part families formations , 1990 .

[9]  Dileep R. Sule,et al.  Machine capacity planning in group technology , 1991 .

[10]  Mohamed S. Kamel,et al.  Machine assignment and part-families formation using group technology , 1994, J. Intell. Manuf..

[11]  Rasaratnam Logendran,et al.  Impact of sequence of operations and layout of cells in cellular manufacturing , 1991 .

[12]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  An Efficient Cluster Identification Algorithm , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  E. Barnes An algorithm for partitioning the nodes of a graph , 1981, 1981 20th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[14]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  The part families problem in flexible manufacturing systems , 1985 .

[15]  Asoo J. Vakharia,et al.  Methods of Cell Formation in Group Technology: A Framework for Evaluation , 1986 .

[16]  John L. Burbidge,et al.  Production flow analysis , 1963 .

[17]  Brian W. Kernighan,et al.  An efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs , 1970, Bell Syst. Tech. J..

[18]  R. G. Kasilingam,et al.  Cell information in flexible manufacturing systems under resource constraints , 1990 .

[19]  T. Narendran,et al.  An assignment model for the part-families problem in group technology , 1990 .

[20]  Rasaratnam Logendran A model for duplicating bottleneck machines in the presence of budgetary limitations in cellular manufacturing , 1992 .

[21]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  The production equipment requirements problem , 1987 .

[22]  F. Fred Choobineh,et al.  A framework for the design of cellular manufacturing systems , 1988 .

[23]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  Tooling constraints and shop floor scheduling: evaluating the impact of sequence dependency , 1992 .

[24]  Rasaratnam Logendran,et al.  A workload based model for minimizing total intercell and intracell moves in cellular manufacturing , 1990 .

[25]  D. A. Milner,et al.  Direct clustering algorithm for group formation in cellular manufacture , 1982 .

[26]  Brian L. Mark,et al.  An efficient eigenvector approach for finding netlist partitions , 1992, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[27]  J. King Machine-component grouping in production flow analysis: an approach using a rank order clustering algorithm , 1980 .

[28]  Ronald G. Askin,et al.  A graph partitioning procedure for machine assignment and cell formation in group technology , 1990 .

[29]  A. Vannelli,et al.  An eigenvector solution methodology for finding part-machine families , 1993 .

[30]  Wing S. Chow,et al.  An efficient algorithm for solving the machine chaining problem in cellular manufacturing , 1992 .

[31]  Nancy Lea Hyer,et al.  Procedures for the part family/machine group identification problem in cellular manufacturing , 1986 .

[32]  Paul J. Schweitzer,et al.  Problem Decomposition and Data Reorganization by a Clustering Technique , 1972, Oper. Res..

[33]  J. King,et al.  Machine-component group formation in group technology: review and extension , 1982 .