Analyzing temporal patterns of knowledge construction in a role-based online discussion

This paper introduces an approach to analyzing temporal patterns of knowledge construction (KC) in online discussions, including consequences of role assignments. The paper illustrates the power of this approach for illuminating collaborative processes using data from a semester-long series of discussions in which 21 university students were assigned weekly roles. The KC contributions of all 252 posts in the discussion were coded using a five phase scheme (Gunawardena et al. 1997). Then, statistical discourse analysis was applied to identify segments of discussion characterized by particular aspects of KC, and “pivotal posts”—those posts which initiated new segments of discussion. Finally, the influences of assigned student roles on pivotal posts and KC were modeled. The results indicate that most online discussions had a single pivotal post separating the discussion into two distinct segments: the first dominated by a lower KC phase; the second dominated by a higher KC phase. This provides empirical evidence supporting the progressive nature of the KC process, but not the necessity of the full five-phase sequence. The pivotal posts that initiated later segments were often contributed mid-discussion by students playing one of two summarizing roles (Synthesizer and Wrapper). This suggests that assigning a summarizing role mid-discussion can aid group progress to more advanced phases of KC. Finally, in some discussion segments, the KC phase of a post was related to characteristics of the two preceding posts. Collectively, the results demonstrate the power of this temporal approach for investigating interdependencies in collaborative KC in online discussions.

[1]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[2]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning : cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives , 2007 .

[4]  Timothy J. Newby,et al.  Using Socratic Questioning to Promote Critical Thinking Skills Through Asynchronous Discussion Forums in Distance Learning Environments , 2005 .

[5]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarovits,et al.  Interaction in cooperative groups : the theoretical anatomy of group learning , 1992 .

[6]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Designing Integrative Scripts , 2007 .

[7]  J. Lemke Across the Scales of Time: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems , 2000 .

[8]  R. Meyers,et al.  Complaint and solution-oriented circles: Interaction patterns in work group discussions , 2009 .

[9]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Multilevel Modeling of Individual and Group Level Mediated Effects , 2001, Multivariate behavioral research.

[10]  Judith B. Pena-Shaff,et al.  Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[11]  A. E. Veldhuis-Diermanse,et al.  Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education , 2001 .

[12]  Ming Ming Chiu,et al.  Effects of argumentation on group micro-creativity: Statistical discourse analyses of algebra students’ collaborative problem solving , 2008 .

[13]  Rose M. Marra,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols , 2004 .

[14]  M. Chiu Flowing Toward Correct Contributions During Group Problem Solving: A Statistical Discourse Analysis , 2008 .

[15]  W. Jochems,et al.  The Effect of Functional Roles on Group Efficiency , 2004 .

[16]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Learning and study strategies : issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation , 1988 .

[17]  P. Dillenbourg What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[18]  Pierre Tchounikine,et al.  Supporting Emergence of Threaded Learning Conversations Through Augmenting Interactional and Sequential Coherence , 2003, CSCL.

[19]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[20]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups? , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[21]  Neil Mercer,et al.  The Seeds of Time: Why Classroom Dialogue Needs a Temporal Analysis , 2008 .

[22]  Caroline Hodges Persell,et al.  Using Focused Web-Based Discussions to Enhance Student Engagement and Deep Understanding , 2004 .

[23]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Effective Discussion Through a Computer-Mediated Anchored Forum , 2000 .

[24]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[25]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  COOPERATIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES , 1988 .

[26]  Peter E. Kennedy A Guide to Econometrics , 1979 .

[27]  Susan C. Herring Interactional Coherence in CMC , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[28]  A. King ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning , 1997 .

[29]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse , 1998 .

[30]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[31]  Jörg M. Haake,et al.  Flexible Scripting in Net-Based Learning Groups , 2007 .

[32]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Applying multilevel modelling to content analysis data: Methodological issues in the study of role assignment in asynchronous discussion groups , 2007 .

[33]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities and Three Metaphors of Learning , 2004 .

[34]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Towards more precise design guidance: specifying and testing the functions of assigned student roles in online discussions , 2012 .

[35]  Peter Reimann,et al.  Time is precious: Variable- and event-centred approaches to process analysis in CSCL research , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[36]  J. Gill Hierarchical Linear Models , 2005 .

[37]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[38]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate , 2006 .

[39]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[40]  M. J. W. Thomas,et al.  Learning within incoherent structures: the space of online discussion forums , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[41]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[42]  Allan C. Tagg Leadership from Within: Student Moderation of Computer Conferences. , 1994 .

[43]  A. King Scripting Collaborative Learning Processes: A Cognitive Perspective , 2007 .

[44]  M. Chiu,et al.  A New Method for Analyzing Sequential Processes , 2005 .

[45]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Structuring Asynchronous Discussion Groups by Introducing Roles , 2008 .

[46]  J. Piaget,et al.  The equilibration of cognitive structures : the central problem of intellectual development , 1985 .

[47]  K. Seo Utilizing Peer Moderating in Online Discussions: Addressing the Controversy between Teacher Moderation and Nonmoderation , 2007 .

[48]  F. Fischer,et al.  A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[49]  Donatella Persico,et al.  Techniques for Fostering Collaboration in Online Learning Communities: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives , 2010 .

[50]  H. Goldstein Multilevel Statistical Models , 2006 .

[51]  M. Chiu,et al.  Rudeness and status effects during group problem solving: Do they bias evaluations and reduce the likelihood of correct solutions? , 2003 .

[52]  E. Salas,et al.  Theories of Team Cognition: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives , 2013 .

[53]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  The need for considering multilevel analysis in CSCL research—An appeal for the use of more advanced statistical methods , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[54]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[55]  M. Valcke,et al.  The Impact of Role Assignment on Knowledge Construction in Asynchronous Discussion Groups , 2005 .