Integrating technologies to provide comprehensive remote fetal surveillance: A prospective pilot study.

OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility of extending remote maternal-fetal care to include fetus well-being. METHODS The authors performed a prospective pilot study investigating low-risk pregnant participants who were recruited at the time of their first full-term in-person visit and scheduled for a follow-up telemedicine visit. Using novel self-operated fetal monitoring and ultrasound devices, fetal heart monitoring and amniotic fluid volume measurements were obtained to complete a modified biophysical profile (mBPP). Total visit length was measured for both the in-person first visit and the subsequent telemedicine encounter. A patient satisfaction survey form was obtained. RESULTS Ten women between 40 + 1 and 40 + 6 weeks of gestation participated in telemedicine encounters. Nine women (90%) were able to complete remote mBPP assessment. For one participant, fetal assessment was not completed due to technically inconclusive fetal monitoring. Another participant was referred for additional assessment in the delivery room. Satisfactory amniotic fluid volume measurements were achieved in 100% of participants. The telemedicine encounter was significantly shorter (93.1 ± 33.1 min) than the in-person visit (247.2 ± 104.7 min; P < 0.001). We observed high patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION Remote fetal well-being assessment is feasible and time-saving and results in high patient satisfaction. This novel paradigm of comprehensive remote maternal and fetal assessment is associated with important clinical, socioeconomic, and logistics advantages.

[1]  N. Zork Telehealth for the Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy , 2022, Current Diabetes Reports.

[2]  L. Tarassenko,et al.  Effect of Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure on Diagnosis of Hypertension During Higher-Risk Pregnancy: The BUMP 1 Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2022, JAMA.

[3]  L. Tarassenko,et al.  Effect of Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Control in Pregnant Individuals With Chronic or Gestational Hypertension: The BUMP 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2022, JAMA.

[4]  N. Donald,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emission Savings in Relation to Telemedicine and Associated Patient Benefits: A Systematic Review. , 2022, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[5]  Tyler J. Thorne,et al.  The Current Status of Telehealth and Distance Learning in Palau. , 2022, Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare.

[6]  C. Lowery,et al.  Novel Uterine Contraction Monitoring to Enable Remote, Self-administered Non-stress Testing. , 2021, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  O. Alagoz,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of telehealth with remote patient monitoring for postpartum hypertension , 2021, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[8]  Antepartum Fetal Surveillance: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 229. , 2021, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  E. Hadar,et al.  Mobile Self-Operated Home Ultrasound System for Remote Fetal Assessment During Pregnancy. , 2021, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[10]  J. Brisbane,et al.  Accuracy, Clinical Utility, and Usability of a Wireless Self-Guided Fetal Heart Rate Monitor , 2021, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  L. Mofenson,et al.  Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, BMJ.

[12]  N. Zork,et al.  Conversion and optimization of telehealth in obstetric care during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, Seminars in Perinatology.

[13]  G. Sotgiu,et al.  COVID-19 in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.

[14]  J. Marshall,et al.  Implementation of Obstetric Telehealth During COVID-19 and Beyond , 2020, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[15]  Elham Monaghesh,et al.  The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence , 2020, BMC Public Health.

[16]  J. Rychik,et al.  Wireless, remote solution for home fetal and maternal heart rate monitoring. , 2020, American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM.

[17]  A. Khalil,et al.  Outcome of coronavirus spectrum infections (SARS, MERS, COVID-19) during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM.

[18]  Centaine L Snoswell,et al.  Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) , 2020, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[19]  Judith C Lin,et al.  Outpatient Telemedicine Program in Vascular Surgery Reduces Patient Travel Time, Cost, and Environmental Pollutant Emissions. , 2019, Annals of vascular surgery.

[20]  Carolyn Ihrig,et al.  Travel Cost Savings and Practicality for Low-Vision Telerehabilitation. , 2019, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[21]  Jonathan W. Inselman,et al.  Randomized comparison of a reduced-visit prenatal care model enhanced with remote monitoring. , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  M. Jong,et al.  Enhancing access to care in northern rural communities via telehealth , 2019, International journal of circumpolar health.

[23]  A. Franx,et al.  eHealth as the Next-Generation Perinatal Care: An Overview of the Literature. , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  Liam J Caffery,et al.  Telehealth services in rural and remote Australia: a systematic review of models of care and factors influencing success and sustainability. , 2016, Rural and remote health.

[25]  Matthew Brooks,et al.  Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review , 2016, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[26]  Louise Davies,et al.  VA Telemedicine: An Analysis of Cost and Time Savings. , 2016, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[27]  C. Meier,et al.  Improving Perinatal Care in the Rural Regions Worldwide by Wireless Enabled Antepartum Fetal Monitoring: A Demonstration Project , 2015, International journal of telemedicine and applications.

[28]  R. Rampersad,et al.  Practice Bulletin No. 146: Management of Late-Term and Postterm Pregnancies , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  L. Duley,et al.  Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review , 2013, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[30]  A. Nabhan,et al.  Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[31]  A. Armstrong,et al.  Economic evaluation of interactive teledermatology compared with conventional care. , 2007, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[32]  R. Brant,et al.  Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care. , 2002, Midwifery.

[33]  David A. Miller,et al.  The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  T. Asrat,et al.  The Value of a Negative Antepartum Test: Contraction Stress Test and Modified Biophysical Profile , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  I. Lange,et al.  Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring. IV. An analysis of perinatal morbidity and mortality. , 1990, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[36]  S. Clark,et al.  Nonstress testing with acoustic stimulation and amniotic fluid volume assessment: 5973 tests without unexpected fetal death. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[37]  K. Trofatter,et al.  A Modified Biophysical Profile for Antenatal Fetal Surveillance , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[38]  J. Phelan,et al.  The Four-Quadrant Assessment of Amniotic Fluid Volume: An Adjunct to Antepartum Fetal Heart Rate Testing , 1987, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  P. Chamberlain,et al.  Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume. I. The relationship of marginal and decreased amniotic fluid volumes to perinatal outcome. , 1984, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[40]  J. Marcin,et al.  Addressing health disparities in rural communities using telehealth , 2016, Pediatric Research.

[41]  ACOG Committee Opinion No 579: Definition of term pregnancy. , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.