Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China

Recreational opportunities and amenities are important human-use services generated by urban greenspaces. This study explored the use of pattern and behavior of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou city, south China. The monetary value of the non-priced benefits was gauged by the contingent valuation method using willingness-to-pay and open-ended payment card approaches. A questionnaire gleaned data by face-to-face interviews of 340 respondents in the 18–70 age group, dwelling in 34 residential street blocks selected by clustered sampling. Guangzhou residents actively used urban greenspaces, accompanied mainly by family members. Parks were the most popular venues, whereas institutional greenspaces served as surrogate parks. Visitation is mainly induced by accessibility, followed by high green coverage and quality of the ambience. Small and low-quality sites near homes were shunned. Residents of the compact city harbored subdued expectation for privacy and solitude. They are accustomed to paying greenspace entrance fees. Ninety-six point six per cent of respondents were willing to pay to use urban greenspaces, notably more than other cities, and indicating the importance of salubrious outdoor recreation as a leisure pursuit. Conservative estimate of average willingness-to-pay was RMB17.40/person/month (US$1.00 = RMB8.26), higher than actual entrance-fee payment. Willingness-to-pay was significantly associated with income, and its marginal effect verified by an ordered probit model which hinted the treatment of urban greenspaces as superior goods. Aggregate monetary value of urban greenspaces attained RMB547 million per year which outstripped Guangzhou’s annual expenditures on urban greenspaces by six times. This study verified the applicability of contingent valuation to urban greenspaces in China with socioeconomic, cultural and political backgrounds that are different from many countries. The results could assist cost-benefit analysis to justify more resources for development and management of urban greenspaces, with implications on incorporating public opinions in a precision planning process in the quest towards sustainable cities. © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  W. H. Weitzer,et al.  The public's image of urban parks: Past amenity, present ambivalance, uncertain future , 1984 .

[2]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[3]  L. Tyrväinen,et al.  Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  P. Jepson,et al.  Values-led conservation , 2003 .

[5]  A. Chiesura.  The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. , 2004 .

[6]  Rüdiger Pethig,et al.  Valuing the environment: methodological and measurement issues. , 1994 .

[7]  L. Tyrväinen,et al.  The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method , 1998 .

[8]  Christopher B. Leinberger,et al.  Urban parks and open space , 1997 .

[9]  L. Tyrväinen,et al.  Ecological and aesthetic values in urban forest management , 2003 .

[10]  D. Bromley.  Handbook of environmental economics , 1995 .

[11]  P. Boxall,et al.  Citizens, consumers and contingent valuation: clarification and the expression of citizen values and issue-opinions. , 1996 .

[12]  W. Douglass Shaw,et al.  A Discrete-Choice Model of Recreational Participation, Site Choice, and Activity Valuation When Complete Trip Data Are Not Available' , 1991 .

[13]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Welfare Measurements Using Contingent Valuation: A Comparison of Techniques , 1988 .

[14]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and developing Countries , 2001 .

[15]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City , 1988 .

[16]  L. Tyrväinen,et al.  Forest management and public perceptions — visual versus verbal information , 2001 .

[17]  Colin Price,et al.  Quantifying the aesthetic benefits of urban forestry , 2003 .

[18]  P. Bolund,et al.  Ecosystem services in urban areas , 1999 .

[19]  C. Pope,et al.  Value of wilderness designation in Utah , 1990 .

[20]  K. G. Willis,et al.  Environmental Valuation: New Perspectives , 1995 .

[21]  Paulo A. L. D. Nunes,et al.  Using factor analysis to identify consumer preferences for the protection of a natural area in Portugal , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1987 .

[23]  Greg Lindsey,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Urban Greenway Projects , 1999 .

[24]  John C. Bergstrom,et al.  Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality , 1991 .

[25]  R. Jensen,et al.  Growth through greening: developing and assessing alternative economic development programmes , 2002 .

[26]  D. Oğuz,et al.  User surveys of Ankara’s urban parks , 2000 .

[27]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Measuring Non-Use Values: Theory and Empirical Applications , 1997 .

[28]  David J. Bjornstad,et al.  The contingent valuation of environmental resources: methodological issues and research needs. , 1996 .

[29]  L. Tyrväinen.  The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method , 1997 .

[30]  Richard Smardon,et al.  Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation , 1988 .

[31]  S. Walker,et al.  Urban parks and open spaces — an overview , 1983 .

[32]  R. Hoevenagel.  An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1994 .

[33]  Guy Garrod,et al.  AN INDIVIDUAL TRAVEL-COST METHOD OF EVALUATING FOREST RECREATION , 1991 .

[34]  David Nichols,et al.  Realising new leisure opportunities for old urban parks: the internal reserve in Australia , 2004 .

[35]  Guy Garrod,et al.  Economic Valuation of the Environment: Methods and Case Studies , 1999 .

[36]  P. Boxall,et al.  Forestry, Economics and the Environment , 1995 .

[37]  Chi Yung Jim,et al.  Comprehensive greenspace planning based on landscape ecology principles in compact Nanjing city, China , 2003 .

[38]  Douglas Reiter,et al.  Effects of Ecological Information on Judgments about Scenic Impacts of Timber Harvest , 1996 .

[39]  P. Gobster.  Urban parks as green walls or green magnets? Interracial relations in neighborhood boundary parks , 1998 .

[40]  P. G. Allen,et al.  Valuation of urban parks , 1988 .

[41]  J. Rasbash,et al.  Willingness-to-pay question format effects in contingent valuation studies , 1999 .

[42]  Richard G. Walsh,et al.  Valuing Time in Travel Cost Demand Analysis: An Empirical Investigation , 1995 .

[43]  Y. Qi,et al.  Assessing Residents' Willingness to Pay to Preserve the Community Urban Forest: A Small-City Case Study , 2000, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[44]  A. Dragun,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Endangered Species: Methodological Issues and Applications , 1996 .

[45]  Zhang Zhiqiang,et al.  Applying contingent valuation in China to measure the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in Ejina region , 2003 .

[46]  Jay Foster,et al.  Natural Capital in Ecology and Economics: An Overview , 2003, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[47]  I. Bateman.  Economic valuation with stated preference techniques : a manual : department for transport , 2002 .

[48]  Kirk Hamilton,et al.  Measuring the Wealth of Nations , 2003, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[49]  Chi Yung Jim,et al.  Patterns and dynamics of urban forests in relation to land use and development history in Guangzhou City, China , 2001 .

[50]  D. Botkin,et al.  Cities as environments , 1997, Urban Ecosystems.

[51]  R. Turner,et al.  A Test of the Equality of Closed-Ended and Open-Ended Contingent Valuations , 1993 .

[52]  W. Solecki,et al.  Urban parks: green spaces or green walls? , 1995 .

[53]  L. Tyrväinen,et al.  Property Prices and Urban Forest Amenities , 2000 .

[54]  Guy Garrod,et al.  The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: A contingent ranking study , 1997 .