Activation dynamics in the optimization of targeted movements

Human movements, and their underlying muscular recruitment strategies, can be studied in several ways. In order to increase the understanding of human movement planning strategies, the movement problem is here seen as a boundary value problem for a mechanism with prescribed initial and final configurations. The time variations of a set of control actuator forces are supposed to fulfil some optimality criterion while creating this motion. The boundary value problem is discretized by temporal finite element interpolation, where the discrete variables are seen in an optimization context. The present work focusses on the introduction of the activation dynamics of the actuators, introducing a delay in the force production from the stimulation variables. The choice of interpolations of the variables is discussed in the light of the optimization setting. Examples show aspects of the results obtained for different assumptions. It is concluded that the formulation gives a good basis for further improvement of muscular force production models in an optimal movement setting.

[1]  Veit Wank,et al.  High-frequency oscillations as a consequence of neglected serial damping in Hill-type muscle models , 2007, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  Sofia Heintz,et al.  Static optimization of muscle forces during gait in comparison to EMG-to-force processing approach. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[3]  Anders Eriksson,et al.  Optimization in simulations of human movement planning , 2011 .

[4]  F C T Van der Helm,et al.  A walking robot called human: lessons to be learned from neural control of locomotion. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Manindra R. Kaphle,et al.  Optimality in forward dynamics simulations. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Modular control of human walking: Adaptations to altered mechanical demands. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  W Herzog,et al.  Analytic analysis of the force sharing among synergistic muscles in one- and two-degree-of-freedom models. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Jack M. Winters,et al.  How detailed should muscle models be to understand multi-joint movement coordination? , 1995 .

[9]  K. Svanberg The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[10]  C. Bottasso,et al.  A numerical procedure for inferring from experimental data the optimization cost functions using a multibody model of the neuro-musculoskeletal system , 2006 .

[11]  T. Flash,et al.  Moving gracefully: quantitative theories of motor coordination , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  Lei Ren,et al.  Predictive modelling of human walking over a complete gait cycle. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  M G Pandy,et al.  Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Scott L Delp,et al.  Generating dynamic simulations of movement using computed muscle control. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  M. Kawato,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  O. von Stryk,et al.  Efficient forward dynamics simulation and optimization of human body dynamics , 2006 .

[17]  J. Heegaard,et al.  Predictive algorithms for neuromuscular control of human locomotion. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  J. Heegaard,et al.  Second‐order optimal control algorithm for complex systems , 2002 .

[19]  B I Prilutsky,et al.  Coordination of two- and one-joint muscles: functional consequences and implications for motor control. , 2000, Motor control.

[20]  A J van den Bogert,et al.  Modelling of force production in skeletal muscle undergoing stretch. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  M G Pandy,et al.  Musculoskeletal Model of the Upper Limb Based on the Visible Human Male Dataset , 2001, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[22]  W. Herzog,et al.  Can a rheological muscle model predict force depression/enhancement? , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  H. Hatze,et al.  A myocybernetic control model of skeletal muscle , 1977, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  Krister Svanberg,et al.  A Class of Globally Convergent Optimization Methods Based on Conservative Convex Separable Approximations , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[25]  Robert Pettersson,et al.  Free-time optimization of targeted movements based on temporal FE approximation , 2010 .

[26]  M L Hull,et al.  A computer simulation of muscle-tendon mechanics. , 1991, Computers in biology and medicine.

[27]  Anders Eriksson,et al.  Temporal finite element formulation of optimal control in mechanisms , 2010 .

[28]  U Proske,et al.  Tension changes in the cat soleus muscle following slow stretch or shortening of the contracting muscle , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  H. Westerblad,et al.  Mechanical work as predictor of force enhancement and force depression. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Anders Eriksson,et al.  Redundant and force-differentiated systems in engineering and nature , 2006 .

[31]  Maarten F. Bobbert,et al.  The contribution of muscle properties in the control of explosive movements , 1993, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[33]  Anders Eriksson,et al.  Optimization in target movement simulations , 2008 .

[34]  Walter Herzog,et al.  History-dependence of isometric muscle force: effect of prior stretch or shortening amplitude. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  Kenneth Meijer,et al.  Muscle contraction history: modified Hill versus an exponential decay model , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[36]  Mark L Latash,et al.  An analytical approach to the problem of inverse optimization with additive objective functions: an application to human prehension , 2010, Journal of mathematical biology.