Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the primary motor cortex and robot-assisted arm training in chronic incomplete cervical spinal cord injury: A proof of concept sham-randomized clinical study.

BACKGROUND After cervical spinal cord injury, current options for treatment of upper extremity motor functions have been limited to traditional approaches. However, there is a substantial need to explore more rigorous alternative treatments to facilitate motor recovery. OBJECTIVE To demonstrate whether anodal-primary motor cortex (M1) excitability enhancement (with cathodal-supra orbital area) (atDCS) combined with robot-assisted arm training (R-AAT) will provide greater improvement in contralateral arm and hand motor functions compared to sham stimulation (stDCS) and R-AAT in patients with chronic, incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (iCSCI). METHODS In this parallel-group, double-blinded, randomized and sham-controlled trial, nine participants with chronic iCSCI (AIS C and D level) were randomized to receive 10 sessions of atDCS or stDSC combined with R-AAT. Feasibility and tolerability was assessed with attrition rate and occurrence of adverse events, Changes in arm and hand function were assessed with Jebson Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT). Amount of Use Scale of Motor Activity Log (AOU-MAL), American Spinal Injury Association Upper Extremity Motor Score and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) at baseline, after treatment, and at two-month follow-up. RESULTS None of the participants missed a treatment session or dropped-out due to adverse events related to the treatment protocol. Participants tended to perform better in JTHFT and AOU-MAL after treatment. Active group at post-treatment and two-month follow-up demonstrated better arm and hand performance compared to sham group. CONCLUSION These preliminary findings support that modulating excitatory input of the corticospinal tracts on spinal circuits may be a promising strategy in improving arm and hand functions in persons with incomplete tetraplegia. Further study is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms of recovery.

[1]  S. Jaberzadeh,et al.  Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Mcdonald,et al.  Activity-based restorative therapies: concepts and applications in spinal cord injury-related neurorehabilitation. , 2009, Developmental disabilities research reviews.

[3]  D. Backus.  Exploring the Potential for Neural Recovery After Incomplete Tetraplegia Through Nonsurgical Interventions , 2010, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[4]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Design and validation of the RiceWrist-S exoskeleton for robotic rehabilitation after incomplete spinal cord injury , 2014, Robotica.

[5]  M. Erb,et al.  Reorganization in the primary motor cortex after spinal cord injury - A functional Magnetic Resonance (fMRI) study. , 1999, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[6]  Corwin Boake,et al.  Robotic training and clinical assessment of upper extremity movements after spinal cord injury: a single case report. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[8]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  S. Garber,et al.  Upper extremity assistive devices: assessment of use by spinal cord-injured patients with quadriplegia. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[10]  M. Zedka,et al.  Primary motor cortex inhibition in spinal cord injuries. , 2012, Neuro endocrinology letters.

[11]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: before, during, or after motor training? , 2015, Neuroreport.

[12]  K. Anderson.  Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.

[13]  Luke A. Henderson,et al.  Functional Reorganization of the Brain in Humans Following Spinal Cord Injury: Evidence for Underlying Changes in Cortical Anatomy , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation to promote motor and functional recovery following spinal cord injury , 2017, Neural regeneration research.

[15]  J. Steeves,et al.  Effect of a robotic rehabilitation device on upper limb function in a sub-acute cervical spinal cord injury population , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[16]  C. J. Mathias,et al.  Action of 5Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on sensory, motor and autonomic function in human spinal cord injury , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  M. Nitsche,et al.  [Modulation of cortical excitability by transcranial direct current stimulation]. , 2002, Der Nervenarzt.

[18]  L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  N J Davey,et al.  Magnetic brain stimulation can improve clinical outcome in incomplete spinal cord injured patients , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[20]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[21]  A. Hicks,et al.  Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being , 2003, Spinal Cord.

[22]  F. Fregni,et al.  A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2011, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[23]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  J. Gomes-Osman,et al.  Improvements in Hand Function in Adults With Chronic Tetraplegia Following a Multiday 10-Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intervention Combined With Repetitive Task Practice , 2015, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[25]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. , 1999, Stroke.

[26]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  A robotic exoskeleton for rehabilitation and assessment of the upper limb following incomplete spinal cord injury , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[27]  M Hallett,et al.  Reorganization of corticospinal pathways following spinal cord injury , 1991, Neurology.

[28]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Degeneration of the Injured Cervical Cord Is Associated with Remote Changes in Corticospinal Tract Integrity and Upper Limb Impairment , 2012, PloS one.

[30]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  RETRACTED: Effects of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor and Gait Improvement in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Patients , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[31]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Corwin Boake,et al.  RiceWrist Robotic Device for Upper Limb Training: Feasibility Study and Case Report of Two Tetraplegic Persons with Spinal Cord Injury , 2012 .

[33]  M. A. Nitsche,et al.  Modulation kortikaler Erregbarkeit beim Menschen durch transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation , 2002, Der Nervenarzt.

[34]  Catherine E Lang,et al.  Relationships and Responsiveness of Six Upper Extremity Function Tests During the First Six Months of Recovery After Stroke , 2009, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[35]  R. H. Jebsen,et al.  An objective and standardized test of hand function. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.