Comparisons of Ground Motions from Colocated and Closely Spaced One-Sample-per-Second Global Positioning System and Accelerograph Recordings of the 2003 M 6.5 San Simeon, California, Earthquake in the Parkfield Region

The 2003 San Simeon, California, earthquake (M 6.5) generated a set of colocated and closely spaced high-rate (1-sample-per-second) Global Positioning System (GPS) positions and ground motions from digital accelerographs in the Park- field region (at epicentral distances of 50 to 70 km). The waveforms of displacements derived from the 13 GPS receivers in the region have dominant periods between about 7 and 18 sec. The waveforms are similar in shape, with a systematic change in waveform as a function of distance from the source. The GPS motions are smaller than the accelerograph motions for periods less than about 2 sec. From this we conclude that the 1-sample-per-sec GPS receivers provide a good representation of ground motion at periods longer than about 2 sec. Perhaps more important for earth- quake engineering is that the accelerograph data are similar to the GPS data for periods as long as 30 sec, if not longer. This means that data from digital accelero- graphs can provide reliable relative-displacement response spectra at the periods needed in the design of large structures, at least for earthquakes with magnitudes of 6.5 or above at distances within 70 km. We combine the colocated or very closely spaced GPS and accelerograph data sets in the frequency domain to obtain a single broadband time series of the ground motion at each accelerograph station. These broadband ground motions may be useful to seismologists in unraveling the dynamic process of fault rupture and to engineers for designing large structures with very- long-period response.

[1]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Seismic wave observations with the Global Positioning System , 2001 .

[2]  Chen Ji,et al.  Slip history of the 2003 San Simeon earthquake constrained by combining 1‐Hz GPS, strong motion, and teleseismic data , 2004 .

[3]  David M. Boore,et al.  Estimated Ground Motion From the 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake at the Site of the Interstate 10 and La Cienega Boulevard Bridge Collapse, West Los Angeles, California , 2003 .

[4]  D. Boore Effect of Baseline Corrections on Displacements and Response Spectra for Several Recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2004 .

[5]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences , 2005 .

[6]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Detection of arbitrarily large dynamic ground motions with a dense high‐rate GPS network , 2004 .

[7]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Southern California permanent GPS geodetic array: Spatial filtering of daily positions for estimating coseismic and postseismic displacements induced by the 1992 Landers earthquake , 1997 .

[8]  John Clinton,et al.  Modern Digital Seismology: Instrumentation, and Small Amplitude Studies in the Engineering World , 2004 .

[9]  M. Hellweg,et al.  The USGS Parkfield, California, dense seismograph array: Upsar , 1992 .

[10]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  Strong ground motion of the San Fernando, California, earthquake: Ground displacements , 1975, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[11]  Gang Chen,et al.  GPS kinematic positioning for the airborne laser altimetry at Long Valley, California , 1998 .

[12]  David M. Boore,et al.  Comments on Baseline Correction of Digital Strong-Motion Data: Examples from the 1999 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake , 2002 .

[13]  Chia-Yen Peng,et al.  Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 2005 .

[14]  David M. Boore,et al.  Some Observations on Colocated and Closely Spaced Strong Ground- Motion Records of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2003 .

[15]  Paul Bodin,et al.  Using 1-Hz GPS Data to Measure Deformations Caused by the Denali Fault Earthquake , 2003, Science.

[16]  David M. Boore Analog-to-Digital Conversion as a Source of Drifts in Displacements Derived from Digital Recordings of Ground Acceleration , 2003 .

[17]  G. L. Choy,et al.  Broad-band deconvolution of GDSN data , 1982 .

[18]  Penina Axelrad,et al.  Modified sidereal filtering: Implications for high‐rate GPS positioning , 2004 .

[19]  Xi-yuan Zhou,et al.  Strong Ground Motions Observed at the UPSAR during the 2003 M 6.5 San Simeon and 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield, California, Earthquakes , 2006 .

[20]  David M. Boore,et al.  Long-Period Ground Motions from Digital Acceleration Recordings: A New Era in Engineering Seismology , 2005 .

[21]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Rapid resolution of crustal motion at short ranges with the global positioning system , 1992 .

[22]  Kristine M. Larson,et al.  Modeling the rupture process of the 2003 September 25 Tokachi‐Oki (Hokkaido) earthquake using 1‐Hz GPS data , 2004 .

[23]  J. Bommer,et al.  DISPLACEMENT SPECTRA FOR SEISMIC DESIGN , 1999 .

[24]  A. G. Brady,et al.  BAP basic strong-motion accelerogram processing software version 1.0 , 1992 .

[25]  Roger D. Borcherdt,et al.  A general earthquake-observation system (GEOS) , 1985 .

[26]  David M. Boore,et al.  On Pads and Filters: Processing Strong-Motion Data , 2005 .

[27]  James L. Davis,et al.  Accuracy of high‐rate GPS for seismology , 2006 .

[28]  E. Faccioli,et al.  Displacement Spectra for Long Periods , 2004 .

[29]  E. Brigham,et al.  The fast Fourier transform and its applications , 1988 .

[30]  Kristine M. Larson,et al.  Recovering Seismic Displacements through Combined Use of 1-Hz GPS and Strong-Motion Accelerometers , 2007 .

[31]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  High‐rate real‐time GPS network at Parkfield: Utility for detecting fault slip and seismic displacements , 2004 .

[32]  Kazuro Hirahara,et al.  Measuring ground deformations with 1-Hz GPS data: the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake (preliminary report) , 2004 .