Methodology to Identify and Prioritise the Social Aspects to Be Considered in the Design of More Sustainable Residential Buildings—Application to a Developing Country

The priorities in the design of more sustainable buildings are quite dependent on the specific social context. In developing countries, the sustainability concept and priorities in the residential buildings sector are quite different from the ones of the developed countries, since there are still basic needs to answer. Therefore, this research is aimed at contributing to a better understanding of the concept of social sustainability in the residential building sector of the developing countries. A methodology to define and prioritise the social sustainability indicators is proposed and applied in the context of Palestine. The presented methodology is based on the sustainability indicators of international standards, on the most well know building sustainability assessment methods and in the analysis of their application to a specific context. It includes a methodology to prioritise the list of social indicators, by considering the expectations of two groups of building stakeholders: designers and building users. At the end, this research proposes a framework of social aspects to consider in the design of more sustainable residential buildings in West Bank, Palestine that is composed of twenty-one indicators, distributed among six sustainability categories and ranked according to their weight in the overall of sustainability level.

[1]  Jeremy T. Gibberd THE SUSTAINABLE BUILDING ASSESSMENT TOOL ASSESSING HOW BUILDINGS CAN SUPPORT SUSTAINABILITY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES , 2002 .

[2]  Rokia Raslan,et al.  Variations in results of building energy simulation tools, and their impact on BREEAM and LEED ratings: A case study , 2013 .

[3]  Hasim Altan,et al.  Comparative Review of Five Sustainable Rating Systems , 2011 .

[4]  Hae Jin Kang Development of a systematic model for an assessment tool for sustainable buildings based on a structural framework , 2015 .

[5]  B. Rudolf,et al.  World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated , 2006 .

[6]  Richard Fenner,et al.  A comparative analysis of two building rating systems Part 1: Evaluation , 2008 .

[7]  Rajasekhara Mouly Potluri,et al.  Assessment of effectiveness of marketing communication mix elements in Ethiopian service sector , 2008 .

[8]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[9]  Grace K C Ding,et al.  Sustainable construction--the role of environmental assessment tools. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Charles Hopkins,et al.  Education for Sustainable Development , 1999 .

[11]  Manfred A. Max-Neef Development and human needs , 2017 .

[12]  Maria de Fátima Morais de Aguiar e Castro,et al.  Development of a healthcare building sustainability assessment method – Proposed structure and system of weights for the Portuguese context , 2017 .

[13]  Hikmat H. Ali,et al.  Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – Case of Jordan , 2009 .

[14]  Cib Construction,et al.  Agenda 21 for sustainable construction in developing countries: a discussion document , 2002 .

[15]  Luís Bragança,et al.  Building Sustainability Assessment , 2010 .

[16]  Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem,et al.  Developing a residential building-related social sustainability assessment framework and its implications for BIM , 2017 .

[17]  Richard Fenner,et al.  A comparative analysis of two building rating systems. Part 2: Case study , 2008 .

[18]  Sunkuk Kim,et al.  Sustainable building assessment tool for project decision makers and its development process , 2016 .

[19]  Omair Awadh,et al.  Sustainability and green building rating systems: LEED, BREEAM, GSAS and Estidama critical analysis , 2017 .

[20]  Ricardo Mateus,et al.  The influence of the Palestinian sociocultural values in shaping the vernacular architecture of Nablus city , 2015 .

[21]  Khalil A. El-Namrouty The Impact of Construction Sector on Palestinian Economy - Case Study : ( Gaza Strip) , 2012 .

[22]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Portuguese sustainable construction assessment tools benchmarked with BREEAM and LEED: An energy analysis , 2014 .

[23]  Peter Hall,et al.  Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design Since 1880 , 2014 .

[24]  Ricardo Mateus,et al.  Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: Developing the methodology SBTool PTH , 2011 .

[25]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Sustainable building assessment tool development approach , 2012 .

[26]  Eva Krídlová Burdová,et al.  Sustainable Building Assessment Tool in Slovakia , 2015 .

[27]  Hani Sewilam Education for Sustainable Development Toolkit : Teachers' Guide , 2018 .

[28]  Wei Pan,et al.  A review of interdependence of sustainable building , 2016 .

[29]  Giorgio Baldinelli,et al.  A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems LEED and ITACA for residential buildings , 2015 .