Sustainability Tensions in Supply Chains: A Case Study of Paradoxes and Their Management

The comprehensive coverage of sustainability issues in a supply chain incurs goal conflicts—i.e., sustainability tensions—and is often limited by market characteristics, such as the availability of sustainable materials and services. While the mainstream business is prioritizing economic goals, a number of entrepreneurs are trying to move forward to more sustainable business practices for their own company and their supply chain. Fairphone represents such a case in the electronics industry, which is openly communicating its sustainability efforts and shortcomings. This communication is content-analyzed in this study by applying the theoretical lenses of paradox sustainability tensions and sustainable supply chain management. Findings of this analysis reveal the limitation of sustainability efforts by supply side characteristics, while Fairphone is innovatively using the demand side of its supply chain to drive sustainability. The resulting tensions among both sides are addressed via pro-active and direct supplier and stakeholder engagement by Fairphone at their suppliers’ mines and factories. The systematic identification of tensions and practices by which they are addressed is adding to our understanding of sustainability practices and goal conflicts in supply chains.

[1]  M. Ting,et al.  Rare Earths: Future Elements of Conflict in Asia? , 2013 .

[2]  Tessa Wernink,et al.  Fairphone: Sustainability from the Inside-Out and Outside-In , 2015 .

[3]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[4]  I. Chen,et al.  Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements , 2004 .

[5]  Ralf Wagner,et al.  Putting sustainable supply chain management into base of the pyramid research , 2015 .

[6]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management , 2008 .

[7]  Zulkifli Mohamed Udin,et al.  Reverse logistics in Malaysia: Investigating the effect of green product design and resource commitment , 2013 .

[8]  L. Ozanne,et al.  Managing the Tensions at the Intersection of the Triple Bottom Line: A Paradox Theory Approach to Sustainability Management , 2016 .

[9]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  The Luxury Paradox: How Systems Thinking and Supply Chain Collaboration Can Bring Sustainability Into Mainstream Practice , 2015 .

[10]  Marcus Brandenburg,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management: a modeling perspective , 2015, Annals of Operations Research.

[11]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Challenges of metal recycling and an international covenant as possible instrument of a globally extended producer responsibility , 2011, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[12]  Philipp Mayring.  Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : Grundlagen und Techniken , 2003 .

[13]  Peter Jones,et al.  Sustainability in the hospitality industry: Some personal reflections on corporate challenges and research agendas , 2016 .

[14]  M. Yan,et al.  Green Component Procurement Collaboration for Improving Supply Chain Management in the High Technology Industries: A Case Study from the Systems Perspective , 2016 .

[15]  Clifford P. McCue,et al.  Professionalism as social responsibility in procurement and administration , 2017 .

[16]  Natalie Slawinski,et al.  Embracing Tensions in Corporate Sustainability , 2015 .

[17]  S. Seuring,et al.  Putting sustainability into supply chain management , 2014 .

[18]  G. R. Ballantyne,et al.  Rare earths supply chains: current status, constraints and opportunities , 2014 .

[19]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Building a More Complete Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Using Case Studies of 10 Exemplars , 2009 .

[20]  Nuria E. Hurtado-Torres,et al.  The Natural Environmental Strategies of International Firms: Old Controversies and New Evidence on Performance and Disclosure , 2016 .

[21]  G. Dhanesh,et al.  Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the Luxury Industry , 2017 .

[22]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[23]  S. Seuring,et al.  Management of Social Issues in Supply Chains: A Literature Review Exploring Social Issues, Actions and Performance Outcomes , 2017 .

[24]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management for minerals , 2017 .

[25]  D. Power,et al.  Building Bridges : Toward Alternative Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management , 2016 .

[26]  J. Mentzer,et al.  GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN RISK MANAGEMENT , 2008 .

[27]  O. Akemu,et al.  Social Enterprise Emergence from Social Movement Activism: The Fairphone Case , 2016 .

[28]  C Ninlawan,et al.  The Implementation of Green Supply Chain Management Practices in Electronics Industry , 2022 .

[29]  J. G. Petrie,et al.  Strategies for reducing the carbon footprint of copper: New technologies, more recycling or demand management? , 2007 .

[30]  Girish Nair,et al.  Sustainability in the Hospitality Industry: A Social Factor Dimension , 2019, EMAJ: Emerging Markets Journal.

[31]  Kai Foerstl,et al.  The Supply Chain Position Paradox: Green Practices and Firm Performance , 2017 .

[32]  Amit Surana,et al.  Supply-chain networks: a complex adaptive systems perspective , 2005 .

[33]  Frank Figge,et al.  A Paradox Perspective on Corporate Sustainability: Descriptive, Instrumental, and Normative Aspects , 2018 .

[34]  Ngai Pun,et al.  The Politics of Global Production: Apple, Foxconn and China's New Working Class , 2013 .

[35]  Frank Figge,et al.  Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework , 2014 .

[36]  Martin J. Liu,et al.  An empirical analysis of consumer motivation towards reverse exchange , 2016 .

[37]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Mixed methodology to analyze the relationship between maturity of environmental management and the adoption of green supply chain management in Brazil , 2014 .

[38]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[39]  Constantin Blome,et al.  Conflict Minerals and Supply Chain Due Diligence: An Exploratory Study of Multi-tier Supply Chains , 2017 .

[40]  J. Freeman,et al.  Green supplier selection using an AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS framework , 2015 .

[41]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING , 2011 .

[42]  M. Lenzen,et al.  Global Supply Chains of Coltan , 2015 .

[43]  Karen Smith Stegen.  Heavy rare earths, permanent magnets, and renewable energies: An imminent crisis , 2015 .

[44]  K. Lai,et al.  An Organizational Theoretic Review of Green Supply Chain Management Literature , 2011 .

[45]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Why Research in Sustainable Supply Chain Management Should Have No Future , 2014 .

[46]  T. Graedel,et al.  Metal stocks and sustainability , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  S. Young.  Responsible sourcing of metals: certification approaches for conflict minerals and conflict-free metals , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[48]  Saleem H Ali,et al.  Sustainability of the Rare Earths Industry , 2014 .

[49]  Teresa Inés Cerratto,et al.  On Fairness & Sustainability: Motivating Change in the Networked Society , 2015, EnviroInfo/ICT4S.

[50]  R. Bleischwitz,et al.  Coltan from Central Africa, international trade and implications for any certification , 2012 .

[51]  S. Seuring,et al.  Core issues in sustainable supply chain management – a Delphi study , 2008 .

[52]  Oladele A Ogunseitan,et al.  Risks of toxic ash from artisanal mining of discarded cellphones. , 2014, Journal of hazardous materials.

[53]  Sofia Garcia-Torres,et al.  Effective Disclosure in the Fast-Fashion Industry: from Sustainability Reporting to Action , 2017 .

[54]  Marcus Brandenburg,et al.  Stakeholder influences and risks in sustainable supply chain management: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative studies , 2018 .

[55]  Denis Collins,et al.  Managing the Poverty–CO2 Reductions Paradox , 2015 .