Efficient Estimation of Sensor Biases for the 3-Dimensional Asynchronous Multi-Sensor System

An important preliminary procedure in multi-sensor data fusion is sensor registration, and the key step in this procedure is to estimate sensor biases from their noisy measurements. There are generally two difficulties in this bias estimation problem: one is the unknown target states which serve as the nuisance variables in the estimation problem, and the other is the highly nonlinear coordinate transformation between the local and global coordinate systems of the sensors. In this paper, we focus on the 3-dimensional asynchronous multi-sensor scenario and propose a weighted nonlinear least squares (NLS) formulation by assuming that there is a target moving with a nearly constant velocity. We propose two possible choices of the weighting matrix in the NLS formulation, which correspond to classical NLS estimation and maximum likelihood (ML) estimation, respectively. To address the intrinsic nonlinearity, we propose a block coordinate descent (BCD) algorithm for solving the formulated problem, which alternately updates different kinds of bias estimates. Specifically, the proposed BCD algorithm involves solving linear LS problems and nonconvex quadratically constrained quadratic program (QCQP) problems with special structures. Instead of adopting the semidefinite relaxation technique, we develop a much more computationally efficient algorithm (with global performance guarantee under certain conditions) to solve the nonconvex QCQP subproblems. The effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed BCD algorithm are demonstrated via numerical simulations.

[1]  Yifeng Zhou,et al.  A Kalman filter based registration approach for asynchronous sensors in multiple sensor fusion applications , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[2]  Hagit Messer,et al.  Notes on the Tightness of the Hybrid CramÉr–Rao Lower Bound , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  Semidefinite Relaxation of Quadratic Optimization Problems , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[4]  Stephen J. Wright Coordinate descent algorithms , 2015, Mathematical Programming.

[5]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  OPTIMAL ASYNCHRONOUS MULTI-SENSOR REGISTRATION IN 3 DIMENSIONS , 2018, 2018 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP).

[6]  Fulvio Gini,et al.  Least Squares Estimation and Cramér–Rao Type Lower Bounds for Relative Sensor Registration Process , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  William L Fischer,et al.  Registration Errors in a Netted Air Surveillance System , 1980 .

[8]  Wotao Yin,et al.  Global Convergence of ADMM in Nonconvex Nonsmooth Optimization , 2015, Journal of Scientific Computing.

[9]  Henry Leung,et al.  Joint Data Association, Registration, and Fusion using EM-KF , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Unbiased converted measurements for tracking , 1998 .

[11]  Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.  Multitarget-multisensor tracking: Advanced applications , 1989 .

[12]  T. R. Rice,et al.  Removal of alignment errors in an integrated system of two 3-D sensors , 1993 .

[13]  Branko Ristic,et al.  Sensor registration in ECEF coordinates using the MLR algorithm , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[14]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Multisensor target tracking performance with bias compensation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[15]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  SDP relaxation of homogeneous quadratic optimization: Approximation bounds and applications , 2009 .

[16]  Fulvio Gini,et al.  On the application of the expectation-maximisation algorithm to the relative sensor registration problem , 2013 .

[17]  Pierluigi Salvo Rossi,et al.  Channel-Aware Decision Fusion in Distributed MIMO Wireless Sensor Networks: Decode-and-Fuse vs. Decode-then-Fuse , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[18]  James P. Reilly,et al.  An EM Algorithm for Nonlinear State Estimation With Model Uncertainties , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[19]  Bahram Shafai,et al.  Registration in Multi-Sensor Data Fusion and Tracking , 1993, 1993 American Control Conference.

[20]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  A two-stage optimization approach to the asynchronous multi-sensor registration problem , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[21]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  Optimal estimation of sensor biases for asynchronous multi-sensor data fusion , 2017, Math. Program..

[22]  Ronald Mahler,et al.  Bayesian unified registration and tracking , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[23]  Branko Ristic,et al.  Calibration of Multi-Target Tracking Algorithms Using Non-Cooperative Targets , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[24]  Henry Leung,et al.  An exact maximum likelihood registration algorithm for data fusion , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[25]  Ya-Feng Liu,et al.  Tightness of a new and enhanced semidefinite relaxation for MIMO detection , 2017, SIAM J. Optim..

[26]  LI X.RONG,et al.  Survey of maneuvering target tracking. Part I. Dynamic models , 2003 .

[27]  R. Bishop,et al.  Solution to a multisensor tracking problem with sensor registration errors , 1999 .

[28]  S. Challa,et al.  Joint sensor registration and track-to-track fusion for distributed trackers , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[29]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  A practical bias estimation algorithm for multisensor-multitarget tracking , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[30]  A. Kruger On Fréchet Subdifferentials , 2003 .

[31]  Alex J. Grant,et al.  The rank of random matrices over finite fields , 2018, ArXiv.