THE "EVERYTHING'S DIFFERENT, EVERY TIME" INNOVATION MANAGEMENT PROBLEM: A PROMISING MODEL DEVELOPMENT

This study reports on the testing of a promising approach for aiding decision-making during innovation. By focusing on the effects of risk/action dyads on success (the Risk/Action/Success (R/A/S) framework), and because perceived risks do appear repeatedly even though they emanate from differing contexts, the model offers an opportunity to learn from what worked best before. Using Artificial Neural Networks, this novel approach allows for generalisation and applicability of specific innovation management actions that are context specific. For academics, the proposed approach contributes to the risk-management literature by proposing a new paradigm for understanding and analysing innovation processes and identification of the most frequently occurring risks as seen by managers directly involved in continuous innovation. In addition, the model offers the capacity to use quantitative techniques to model the overlapping risks and actions during innovation-related decision-making. For practitioners, it can provide specific recommendations in the form of success-sorted lists of actions taken by other innovation managers that faced similar risks. This paper presents the theoretical and practical rationales underpinning this R/A/S framework and reports on the viability of this approach using pilot data.

[1]  R. Lipshitz,et al.  Coping with Uncertainty: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Analysis , 1997 .

[2]  Gina Colarelli O'Connor,et al.  Risk management through learning: Management practices for radical innovation success , 2008 .

[3]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[4]  Andrea Roli,et al.  A neural network approach for credit risk evaluation , 2008 .

[5]  Ken Sakamura,et al.  Improved estimation of energy expenditure by artificial neural network modeling. , 2008, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[6]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  Technology, globalisation and economic performance , 1997 .

[7]  L. Cooper A research agenda to reduce risk in new product development through knowledge management: a practitioner perspective , 2003 .

[8]  J. Carroll,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue. Naturalistic Decision Making and Organizational Decision Making: Exploring the Intersections , 2006 .

[9]  B. Nijstad,et al.  The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science , 2004 .

[10]  Wenpin Tsai Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[11]  Jerker Denrell,et al.  Strategic responsiveness and Bowman's risk–return paradox , 2007 .

[12]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Schumpeterian patterns of innovative activity in the ICT field , 2007 .

[13]  Siamak Noori,et al.  An Integrated Methodology for Assessment and Selection of the Project Risk Response Actions , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  Cheng-Hua Tzeng A review of contemporary innovation literature: A Schumpeterian perspective , 2009 .

[15]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[16]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[17]  Tony Becher Academic Tribes And Territories , 1989 .

[18]  Edward H. Bowman,et al.  A risk/return paradox for strategic management , 2011 .

[19]  Keith Goffin,et al.  Tacit Knowledge, Lessons Learnt, and New Product Development , 2011 .

[20]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Propensity , 1995 .

[22]  Markus C. Becker Organizational routines: a review of the literature , 2004 .

[23]  G. Grossman,et al.  TRADE; INNOVATION; AND GROWTH , 1990 .

[24]  Ofer Zwikael,et al.  The Effectiveness of Risk Management: An Analysis of Project Risk Planning Across Industries and Countries , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  A. Arcuri,et al.  Centralization versus Decentralization as a Risk‐Return Trade‐Off , 2009, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[26]  Jim Joop Halman,et al.  Risks in New Product Development: Devising a Reference Tool , 2005 .

[27]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Assessing new product development project risk by Bayesian network with a systematic probability generation methodology , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Patterns of generation and adoption of innovation in organizations: Contingency models of innovation attributes , 1994 .

[29]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  Innovation studies—The emerging structure of a new scientific field , 2009 .

[30]  Ming-Jer Chen,et al.  New Academic Fields as Admittance-Seeking Social Movements: The Case of Strategic Management , 2008 .

[31]  R. Rothwell Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s , 1992 .

[32]  Lynette Ryals,et al.  Optimising marketing spend: return maximisation and risk minimisation in the marketing portfolio , 2007 .

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[34]  A. Griffin,et al.  An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure , 1993 .

[35]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Strategy as Improvisational Theater , 2002 .

[36]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[37]  Hongliang Zhang,et al.  A redefinition of the project risk process: Using vulnerability to open up the event-consequence link , 2007 .

[38]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[39]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Affect, risk, and decision making. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[40]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Intelligence and maintenance proficiency: an examination of plant operators , 2005 .

[41]  A. Boonstra,et al.  Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence , 2010 .

[42]  Adnan Khashman,et al.  Neural networks for credit risk evaluation: Investigation of different neural models and learning schemes , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[43]  C. Egbu Managing knowledge and intellectual capital for improved organizational innovations in the construction industry: an examination of critical success factors , 2004 .

[44]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The breakfast of champions: associations between champions and product development environments, practices and performance , 1998 .

[45]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[46]  Jay Mitra,et al.  Making connections: innovation and collective learning in small businesses , 2000 .

[47]  Uli Mahle The Path to Invention , 2007 .

[48]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[49]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers , 2001 .

[50]  S. Sambrook,et al.  Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation , 2009 .

[51]  T. Bewley Knightian decision theory. Part I , 2002 .

[52]  Yacov Y Haimes,et al.  On the Complex Definition of Risk: A Systems‐Based Approach , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[53]  David Hemsworth,et al.  INNOVATION PROCESS, DECISION-MAKING, PERCEIVED RISKS AND METRICS: A DYNAMICS TEST , 2013 .

[54]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation , 1996 .

[55]  Pierre Mohnen,et al.  Complementarities in Innovation Policy , 2001 .

[56]  Hei-Kuang Lee,et al.  A proposed process for systematic innovation , 2011 .

[57]  Tomislav Mandakovic,et al.  R&D Project Selection Models , 1986 .

[58]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[59]  Paul Herbig,et al.  Customer Acceptance: The Key to Successful Introductions of Innovations (Принятие клиента: ключ к успешному введению инноваций) , 1992 .

[60]  James A. Fanto Anticipating the Unthinkable: The Adequacy of Risk Management in Finance and Environmental Studies , 2009 .

[61]  E. Weber,et al.  Perceived risk attitudes: relating risk perception to risky choice , 1997 .

[62]  Paulo N. Figueiredo,et al.  Risk Sharing Partnerships With Suppliers: The Case of EMBRAER , 2008 .

[63]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[64]  P. Slovic,et al.  Risk Perception and Affect , 2006 .

[65]  Tomoatsu Shibata Managing parallel development towards technological transitions , 2012, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[66]  John K. Christiansen,et al.  Making Decisions on Innovation: Meetings or Networks? , 2007 .

[67]  G. Soutar,et al.  Measuring new product success: an empirical investigation of Australian SMEs , 2004 .

[68]  Ji-Ping Huang,et al.  Risk-Return Relationship in a Complex Adaptive System , 2012, PloS one.

[69]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base , 2012, posted content for vor conflict notifications.

[70]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[71]  Atanu Chaudhuri,et al.  Supply chain risk assessment during new product development: a group decision making approach using numeric and linguistic data , 2013 .

[72]  R. Camagni Innovation Networks , 1991 .

[73]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of product innovations: defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion behavior , 2005 .

[74]  Johannes I. M. Halman,et al.  Risks in major innovation projects, a multiple case study within a world's leading company in the fast moving consumer goods , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..