EMG scanning in the diagnosis of chronic pain

A surface EMG diagnostic protocol was developed to assess the neuromuscular/postural contributions to pain states. The EMG activity of the right and left aspects of 11 muscle groups were monitored while the patient was in the sitting and standing positions. The diagnostic protocol was evaluated by comparing the patterns of EMG activity in four diagnostic groups: headache only, neck/shoulder/upper back pain only, low back pain only, and mixed pain states. The results suggest that (1) bilateral levels of EMG activity in the frontalis and masseter groups are of primary importance for the headache patients, (2) the discrepancy between the right and left EMG activity in the lumbar and cervical paraspinal muscle groups are of primary importance for low back pain patients, (3) position (sit/stand) may provide important diagnostic information, and (4) the data appear to support the notion of a postural disturbance as a contributing factor in low back pain.

[1]  W. Floyd,et al.  The function of the erectores spinae muscles in certain movements and postures in man * , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Bengt Jonsson.  The lumbar part of the erector spinae muscle : a technique for electromyographic studies of the function of its individual muscles , 1970 .

[3]  Joel L Cohen,et al.  The use of EMG feedback and progressive relaxation in the treatment of a woman with chronic back pain , 1979, Biofeedback and self-regulation.

[4]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  SYMPTOMS OF ANXIETY AND TENSION AND THE ACCOMPANYING PHYSIOLOGICAL CHANGES IN THE MUSCULAR SYSTEM , 1954, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  R. Melzack.  Behavioral methods for chronic pain and illness W.E. Fordyce, C.V. Mosby Company, St. Louis, Mo., 1976, ix + 236 pp , 1977, Pain.

[6]  B Jonsson,et al.  The functions of individual muscles in the lumbar part of the spinae muscle. , 1970, Electromyography.

[7]  J. Cram.  EMG biofeedback and the treatment of tension headaches: A systematic analysis of treatment components , 1980 .

[8]  D. B. Jenkins,et al.  Functional anatomy of the limbs and back , 1969 .

[9]  R. G. Harper,et al.  Psychological Correlates of Frontalis EMG and Pain in Tension Headache , 1978, Headache.

[10]  S. Haynes,et al.  Electromyographic biofeedback and relaxation instructions in the treatment of muscle contraction headaches , 1975 .

[11]  J. Joseph.  Man's posture : electromyographic studies , 1960 .

[12]  R. Harper,et al.  Comprehensive Biofeedback Versus Self‐Monitored Relaxation in the Treatment of Tension Headache , 1980, Headache.

[13]  S. Haynes,et al.  FRONTALIS EMG RESPONSE TO STRESS IN SUBJECTS WITH FREQUENT MUSCLE‐CONTRACTION HEADACHES , 1977 .

[14]  D. J. Mullaney,et al.  EMG Biofeedback and Tension Headache: A Controlled Outcome Study , 1973, Psychosomatic medicine.

[15]  S. Wolf,et al.  Treating Chronic Low Back Pain , 1980 .

[16]  J V Basmajian,et al.  Electromyography of deep back muscles in man. , 1972, The American journal of anatomy.

[17]  J. Solinger,et al.  The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback training in low back pain , 1979, Biofeedback and self-regulation.

[18]  Steven L. Wolf,et al.  EMG feedback training during dynamic movement for low back pain patients , 1982 .

[19]  J. Pauly.  An electromyographic analysis of certain movements and exercises. I. some deep muscles of the back , 1966, The Anatomical record.