Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English fricatives.

Speakers can adopt a speaking style that allows them to be understood more easily in difficult communication situations, but few studies have examined the acoustic properties of clearly produced consonants in detail. This study attempts to characterize the adaptations in the clear production of American English fricatives in a carefully controlled range of communication situations. Ten female and ten male talkers produced fricatives in vowel-fricative-vowel contexts in both a conversational and a clear style that was elicited by means of simulated recognition errors in feedback received from an interactive computer program. Acoustic measurements were taken for spectral, amplitudinal, and temporal properties known to influence fricative recognition. Results illustrate that (1) there were consistent overall style effects, several of which (consonant duration, spectral peak frequency, and spectral moments) were consistent with previous findings and a few (notably consonant-to-vowel intensity ratio) of which were not; (2) specific acoustic modifications in clear productions of fricatives were influenced by the nature of the recognition errors that prompted the productions and were consistent with efforts to emphasize potentially misperceived contrasts both within the English fricative inventory and based on feedback from the simulated listener; and (3) talkers differed widely in the types and magnitude of all modifications.

[1]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[2]  Noah Silbert,et al.  Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification: patterns of variation in fricative production. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  A. Jongman,et al.  Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  P. Jackson,et al.  Amplitude modulation of turbulence noise by voicing in fricatives. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of clearly produced fricatives , 2006 .

[6]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  Acoustic and spectral characteristics of young children's fricative productions: a developmental perspective. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Frank H Guenther,et al.  The distinctness of speakers' /s/-/S/ contrast is related to their auditory discrimination and use of an articulatory saturation effect. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[8]  Ann R Bradlow,et al.  Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Sheng Liu,et al.  Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  S. Nittrouer Learning to perceive speech: how fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Tessa Bent,et al.  The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  D. Kewley-Port,et al.  Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Christine H. Shadle,et al.  A parametric study of the spectral characteristics of European Portuguese fricatives , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[15]  D. Kewley-Port,et al.  Vowels in clear and conversational speech: Talker differences in acoustic characteristics and intelligibility for normal‐hearing listeners , 2002 .

[16]  C H Shadle,et al.  Frication noise modulated by voicing, as revealed by pitch-scaled decomposition. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Henning Reetz,et al.  Crosslinguistic acoustic categorization of sibilants independent of phonological status , 1998 .

[19]  K S Helfer,et al.  Auditory and auditory-visual recognition of clear and conversational speech by older adults. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[20]  Santiago Fernández,et al.  Context effects in the auditory identification of Spanish fricatives /f/ and /θ/: Hyper and Hypospeech , 1998 .

[21]  K S Helfer,et al.  Auditory and auditory-visual perception of clear and conversational speech. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[22]  Christine H. Shadle,et al.  Quantifying spectral characteristics of fricatives , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[23]  Jean C. Krause,et al.  Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  D J Schum,et al.  Intelligibility of clear and conversational speech of young and elderly talkers. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[25]  L. Braida,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[26]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Role of articulation in speech perception: clues from production. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels , 1994 .

[28]  L D Braida,et al.  Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Richard Wright,et al.  The Hyperspace Effect: Phonetic Targets Are Hyperarticulated. , 1993 .

[30]  R. N. Ohde,et al.  Effect of relative amplitude of frication on perception of place of articulation. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  V. Mann,et al.  Perceptual order and the effect of vocalic context on fricative perception , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  A. Jongman Duration of frication noise required for identification of English fricatives. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  R. S. McGowan,et al.  The emergence of phonetic segments: evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables spoken by children and adults. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[34]  Thomas H. Crystal,et al.  A note on the durations of fricatives in American English , 1988 .

[35]  P. Milenkovic,et al.  Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: preliminary data. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of English voiceless fricatives: a descriptive analysis , 1988 .

[37]  S R Baum,et al.  Preliminary observations on the use of duration as a cue to syllable-initial fricative consonant voicing in English. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[39]  N I Durlach,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[40]  S. Soli,et al.  Recognition of vowels from information in fricatives: perceptual evidence of fricative-vowel coarticulation. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  S. Soli Second formants in fricatives: Acoustic consequences of fricative‐vowel coarticulation , 1981 .

[42]  K. Stevens Evidence for the role of acoustic boundaries in the perception of speech sounds , 1981 .

[43]  V. Mann,et al.  Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction , 1978 .

[44]  M. D. Wang,et al.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  R C Bilger,et al.  Consonant confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1972, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[46]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  Erratum: "Airflow and Turbulence Noise for Fricative and Stop Consonants: Static Considerations" [K. N. Stevens, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 50, 1180 1192 (1971)] , 1972 .

[47]  K. Stevens Airflow and Turbulence Noise for Fricative and Stop Consonants: Static Considerations , 1971 .

[48]  P. Strevens Spectra of Fricative Noise in Human Speech , 1960 .

[49]  G. W. Hughes,et al.  Spectral Properties of Fricative Consonants , 1956 .

[50]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[51]  P. Iverson,et al.  The recognition of clear speech by adult cochlear implant users , 2002 .

[52]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[53]  S Nittrouer,et al.  Children learn separate aspects of speech production at different rates: evidence from spectral moments. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  A. Ganapathiraju,et al.  LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS - A BRIEF TUTORIAL , 1995 .

[55]  P. Boersma ACCURATE SHORT-TERM ANALYSIS OF THE FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY AND THE HARMONICS-TO-NOISE RATIO OF A SAMPLED SOUND , 1993 .

[56]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[57]  R S McGowan,et al.  Differences in fricative production between children and adults: evidence from an acoustic analysis of /sh/ and /s/. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  D. Whalen Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  Francine R. Chen,et al.  Acoustic characteristics and intelligibility of clear and conversational speech at the segmental level , 1980 .

[60]  B H Repp,et al.  Influence of Vocalic Context on Perception of the [j [s] Distinction: Ii. Spectral Factors , 2022 .