Kin Discrimination Increases with Genetic Distance in a Social Amoeba

In the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum, thousands of cells aggregate upon starvation to form a multicellular fruiting body, and approximately 20% of them die to form a stalk that benefits the others. The aggregative nature of multicellular development makes the cells vulnerable to exploitation by cheaters, and the potential for cheating is indeed high. Cells might avoid being victimized if they can discriminate among individuals and avoid those that are genetically different. We tested how widely social amoebae cooperate by mixing isolates from different localities that cover most of their natural range. We show here that different isolates partially exclude one another during aggregation, and there is a positive relationship between the extent of this exclusion and the genetic distance between strains. Our findings demonstrate that D. discoideum cells co-aggregate more with genetically similar than dissimilar individuals, suggesting the existence of a mechanism that discerns the degree of genetic similarity between individuals in this social microorganism.

[1]  K. Raper,et al.  INTERSPECIFIC MIXTURES IN THE DICTYOSTELIACEAE , 1941 .

[2]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  J. Sternfeld.  Evidence for differential cellular adhesion as the mechanism of sorting-out of various cellular slime mold species. , 1979, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[5]  L W Buss,et al.  Somatic cell parasitism and the evolution of somatic tissue compatibility. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  R. Crozier.  GENETIC CLONAL RECOGNITION ABILITIES IN MARINE INVERTEBRATES MUST BE MAINTAINED BY SELECTION FOR SOMETHING ELSE , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  M. Sussman,et al.  Cultivation and synchronous morphogenesis of Dictyostelium under controlled experimental conditions. , 1987, Methods in cell biology.

[8]  L. Buss,et al.  The evolution of individuality , 1987 .

[9]  R. Grosberg.  The Evolution of Allorecognition Specificity in Clonal Invertebrates , 1988, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[10]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. , 1992, Genetics.

[11]  E. Boerwinkle,et al.  VNTR allele frequency distributions under the stepwise mutation model: a computer simulation approach. , 1993, Genetics.

[12]  N. Freimer,et al.  Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited. , 1993, Genetics.

[13]  N. Freimer,et al.  Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[15]  M. Blouin,et al.  Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness , 1996, Molecular ecology.

[16]  N Takezaki,et al.  Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. , 1996, Genetics.

[17]  E. Ponte,et al.  Detection of subtle phenotypes: the case of the cell adhesion molecule csA in Dictyostelium. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  R. Grosberg,et al.  One cell, two cell, red cell, blue cell: The persistence of a unicellular stage in multicellular life histories. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  Rod Peakall,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure , 1999, Heredity.

[20]  D. Knecht,et al.  Variables controlling the expression level of exogenous genes in Dictyostelium. , 1999, Plasmid.

[21]  J. Cavender,et al.  Global distribution of forest soil dictyostelids , 1999 .

[22]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2000, Nature.

[23]  D. Jacobson,et al.  The genetics of hyphal fusion and vegetative incompatibility in filamentous ascomycete fungi. , 2000, Annual review of genetics.

[24]  R. Kessin,et al.  Dictyostelium amoebae lacking an F-box protein form spores rather than stalk in chimeras with wild type. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Coates,et al.  Cell-cell adhesion and signal transduction during Dictyostelium development. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[26]  B. Crespi.  The evolution of social behavior in microorganisms. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  R. Kessin.  Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity , 2001 .

[28]  Zuleyma Tang-Martinez,et al.  The mechanisms of kin discrimination and the evolution of kin recognition in vertebrates: a critical re-evaluation , 2001, Behavioural Processes.

[29]  M. Riley,et al.  Bacteriocins: evolution, ecology, and application. , 2002, Annual review of microbiology.

[30]  W. Loomis,et al.  Disruption of the gene encoding the cell adhesion molecule DdCAD-1 leads to aberrant cell sorting and cell-type proportioning during Dictyostelium development. , 2002, Development.

[31]  K. Foster,et al.  The costs and benefits of being a chimera , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Co‐occurrence in nature of different clones of the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[33]  J. Strassmann,et al.  A linear dominance hierarchy among clones in chimeras of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[34]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Single-Gene Greenbeard Effects in the Social Amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2003, Science.

[35]  Michael S. Blouin,et al.  DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations , 2003 .

[36]  P. Rainey,et al.  Evolution of cooperation and conflict in experimental bacterial populations , 2003, Nature.

[37]  O. Hardy,et al.  Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation‐by‐distance processes using dominant genetic markers , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[38]  G. J. Velicer.  Social strife in the microbial world. , 2003, Trends in microbiology.

[39]  M. Travisano,et al.  Strategies of microbial cheater control. , 2004, Trends in microbiology.

[40]  J. Mateo.  Recognition systems and biological organization: The perception component of social recognition , 2004 .

[41]  Cornelis J Weijer,et al.  Dictyostelium morphogenesis. , 2004, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[42]  Martin Ackermann,et al.  Evolution of cooperation: Two for One? , 2004, Current Biology.

[43]  W. G. Holmes.  The early history of Hamiltonian-based research on kin recognition , 2004 .

[44]  G. J. Velicer,et al.  Exploitative and Hierarchical Antagonism in a Cooperative Bacterium , 2005, PLoS biology.

[45]  D. Queller,et al.  Genetic relatedness in viscous populations , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[46]  Don A. Driscoll,et al.  Ecological Genetics: Design, Analysis, and Application , 2005 .

[47]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Social evolution: Kin preference in a social microbe , 2006, Nature.

[48]  A. Griffin,et al.  Social evolution theory for microorganisms , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[49]  Kevin R Foster,et al.  High relatedness maintains multicellular cooperation in a social amoeba by controlling cheater mutants , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  The Cold War of the Social Amoebae , 2007, Current Biology.

[51]  J. Strassmann,et al.  An Unusually Low Microsatellite Mutation Rate in Dictyostelium discoideum, an Organism With Unusually Abundant Microsatellites , 2007, Genetics.

[52]  J. Bonner,et al.  Social insects and social amoebae , 1994, Journal of Biosciences.

[53]  A. Griffin,et al.  The Social Lives of Microbes , 2007 .

[54]  Anup Parikh,et al.  Facultative cheater mutants reveal the genetic complexity of cooperation in social amoebae , 2008, Nature.

[55]  J. Strassmann,et al.  PHYLOGENY, REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION AND KIN RECOGNITION IN THE SOCIAL AMOEBA DICTYOSTELIUM PURPUREUM , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[56]  M. Bekoff,et al.  What Does “Kin Recognition” Mean? , 2010 .