Many-body effects in nanocrystal superlattices: departure from sphere packing explains stability of binary phases.

This work analyzes the role of hydrocarbon ligands in the self-assembly of nanocrystal (NC) superlattices. Typical NCs, composed of an inorganic core of radius R and a layer of capping ligands with length L, can be described as soft spheres with softness parameter L/R. Using particle tracking measurements of transmission electron microscopy images, we find that close-packed NCs, like their hard-sphere counterparts, fill space at approximately 74% density independent of softness. We uncover deformability of the ligand capping layer that leads to variable effective NC size in response to the coordination environment. This effect plays an important role in the packing of particles in binary nanocrystal superlattices (BNSLs). Measurements on BNSLs composed of NCs of varying softness in several coordination geometries indicate that NCs deform to produce dense BNSLs that would otherwise be low-density arrangements if the particles remained spherical. Consequently, rationalizing the mixing of two NC species during BNSL self-assembly need not employ complex energetic interactions. We summarize our analysis in a set of packing rules. These findings contribute to a general understanding of entropic effects during crystallization of deformable objects (e.g., nanoparticles, micelles, globular proteins) that can adapt their shape to the local coordination environment.

[1]  Ruipeng Li,et al.  Decoding the superlattice and interface structure of truncate PbS nanocrystal-assembled supercrystal and associated interaction forces. , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  L. D. A. Siebbeles,et al.  Long-range orientation and atomic attachment of nanocrystals in 2D honeycomb superlattices , 2014, Science.

[3]  Yoav Kallus The 3-ball is a local pessimum for packing , 2012, 1212.2551.

[4]  Horst Weller,et al.  Correlating superlattice polymorphs to internanoparticle distance, packing density, and surface lattice in assemblies of PbS nanoparticles. , 2013, Nano letters.

[5]  E. Rabani,et al.  On the phase behavior of binary mixtures of nanoparticles. , 2013, ACS nano.

[6]  Matthew G. Panthani,et al.  Graphene-Supported High-Resolution TEM and STEM Imaging of Silicon Nanocrystals and their Capping Ligands , 2012 .

[7]  T. Hanrath,et al.  Comparing the structural stability of PbS nanocrystals assembled in fcc and bcc superlattice allotropes. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  Zhongwu Wang,et al.  Structural control of nanocrystal superlattices using organic guest molecules. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  Chad A. Mirkin,et al.  Nanoparticle Superlattice Engineering with DNA , 2011, Science.

[10]  C. Murray,et al.  Polymorphism in self-assembled AB6 binary nanocrystal superlattices. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  M. Dijkstra,et al.  Entropy-driven formation of binary semiconductor-nanocrystal superlattices. , 2010, Nano letters.

[12]  Dmitri V Talapin,et al.  Energetic and entropic contributions to self-assembly of binary nanocrystal superlattices: temperature as the structure-directing factor. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  Christopher B. Murray,et al.  Quasicrystalline order in self-assembled binary nanoparticle superlattices , 2009, Nature.

[14]  T. Vlugt,et al.  Understanding interactions between capped nanocrystals: three-body and chain packing effects. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[15]  A. Alivisatos,et al.  Observation of Single Colloidal Platinum Nanocrystal Growth Trajectories , 2009, Science.

[16]  Shouheng Sun,et al.  A facile synthesis of monodisperse Au nanoparticles and their catalysis of CO oxidation , 2008 .

[17]  Zhuoying Chen,et al.  Structure direction of II-VI semiconductor quantum dot binary nanoparticle superlattices by tuning radius ratio. , 2008, ACS nano.

[18]  P. Král,et al.  Dipole-dipole interactions in nanoparticle superlattices. , 2007, Nano letters.

[19]  Dmitri V Talapin,et al.  Structural characterization of self-assembled multifunctional binary nanoparticle superlattices. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  Christopher B. Murray,et al.  Structural diversity in binary nanoparticle superlattices , 2006, Nature.

[21]  C. Patrick Royall,et al.  Ionic colloidal crystals of oppositely charged particles , 2005, Nature.

[22]  M. Matsen Effect of Chain Tilt on the Interaction between Brush-Coated Colloids , 2005 .

[23]  U. Landman,et al.  Small is different: energetic, structural, thermal, and mechanical properties of passivated nanocluster assemblies. , 2004, Faraday discussions.

[24]  Gregory D. Scholes,et al.  Colloidal PbS Nanocrystals with Size‐Tunable Near‐Infrared Emission: Observation of Post‐Synthesis Self‐Narrowing of the Particle Size Distribution , 2003 .

[25]  Taeghwan Hyeon,et al.  Synthesis of highly crystalline and monodisperse maghemite nanocrystallites without a size-selection process. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[26]  Bartlett,et al.  Superlattice formation in mixtures of hard-sphere colloids , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[27]  A. M. Alvarez,et al.  Crystal Structures of Molecular Gold Nanocrystal Arrays , 1999 .

[28]  M. Brust,et al.  Spontaneous ordering of bimodal ensembles of nanoscopic gold clusters , 1998, Nature.

[29]  B. Korgel,et al.  Assembly and Self-Organization of Silver Nanocrystal Superlattices: Ordered “Soft Spheres” , 1998 .

[30]  L. Demers,et al.  Structure and Dynamics in Alkanethiolate Monolayers Self-Assembled on Gold Nanoparticles: A DSC, FT-IR, and Deuterium NMR Study , 1997 .

[31]  James R. Heath,et al.  Synthesis and Characterization of Hydrophobic, Organically-Soluble Gold Nanocrystals Functionalized with Primary Amines , 1996 .

[32]  U. Landman,et al.  Structure, dynamics, and thermodynamics of passivated gold nanocrystallites and their assemblies , 1996 .

[33]  Cherie R. Kagan,et al.  Self-Organization of CdSe Nanocrystallites into Three-Dimensional Quantum Dot Superlattices , 1995, Science.

[34]  P. Pusey,et al.  Binary hard-sphere mixtures: a comparison between computer simulation and experiment , 1995 .

[35]  M. Bawendi,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of nearly monodisperse CdE (E = sulfur, selenium, tellurium) semiconductor nanocrystallites , 1993 .

[36]  D. Frenkel,et al.  Entropy-driven formation of a superlattice in a hard-sphere binary mixture , 1993, Nature.

[37]  Bartlett,et al.  Superlattice formation in binary mixtures of hard-sphere colloids. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[38]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Comparison of the Structures and Wetting Properties of Self-Assembled Monolayers of n- Alkanethiols on the Coinage Metal Surfaces, Cu, Ag, Au' , 1991 .

[39]  P. Pusey,et al.  Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres , 1986, Nature.

[40]  J. V. Sanders,et al.  Close-packed structures of spheres of two different sizes II. The packing densities of likely arrangements , 1980 .

[41]  J. V. Sanders Close-packed structures of spheres of two different sizes I. Observations on natural opal , 1980 .

[42]  R. D. Shannon Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides , 1976 .

[43]  J. V. Sanders,et al.  Colour of Precious Opal , 1964, Nature.

[44]  L. Salem Attractive Forces between Long Saturated Chains at Short Distances , 1962 .

[45]  L. Pauling THE PRINCIPLES DETERMINING THE STRUCTURE OF COMPLEX IONIC CRYSTALS , 1929 .