Commercializing inventions resulting from university research: Analyzing the impact of technology characteristics on subsequent business models

Abstract One of the key challenges in commercializing inventions arising from academic research is deciding on an appropriate business model for transferring the invention from the academic world to the commercial world. However, there is little empirical evidence to suggest which model to choose. This study attempts to address this gap by examining how characteristics of technologies affect the selection of business models. We consider four characteristics of technology: patent or other legal protection, specialized complementary assets, commercial uncertainty and technological dynamism. We relate these characteristics to the choice of three basic business models for commercializing inventions. Data for this study were gathered for 42 commercialized inventions. We found evidence that greater patent or other legal protection for the technology was associated with a greater likelihood that the technology was commercialized by transferring limited rights to the technology to existing firms. We also found evidence that greater commercial uncertainty was associated with a greater likelihood that the technology was commercialized by creation of a new firm or transfer of the rights to the technology to an existing firm. We did not find evidence of a relationship between the importance of specialized complementary assets or technological dynamism and the business model used.

[1]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D , 1988 .

[2]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature , 2007 .

[3]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[4]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Scott Shane,et al.  When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive? , 2003 .

[6]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[7]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Rigid Disk Drive Industry: A History of Commercial and Technological Turbulence , 1993, Business History Review.

[8]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[9]  M. Fontes.  The process of transformation of scientific and technological knowledge into economic value conducted by biotechnology spin-offs , 2005 .

[10]  R. McNaughton,et al.  Making University Departments More Entrepreneurial , 2005 .

[11]  A. Agrawal.  University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions , 2001 .

[12]  C. Wolter,et al.  The Effects of Innovation on Vertical Structure: Perspectives on Transaction Costs and Competences , 2008 .

[13]  A. A. del Campo,et al.  The transfer and commercialization of university-developed medical imaging technology: opportunities and problems , 1999 .

[14]  Philip E. Auerswald,et al.  Valleys of Death and Darwinian Seas: Financing the Invention to Innovation Transition in the United States , 2003 .

[15]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Testing Alternative Theories of the Firm: Transaction Cost, Knowledge-Based, and Measurement Explanations for Make-or- Buy Decisions in Information Services , 1997 .

[16]  G. Walker,et al.  A Transaction Cost Approach to Make-or-Buy Decisions , 1984 .

[17]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[18]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[19]  Gary L. Frazier,et al.  A Transaction Cost Analysis Model of Channel Integration in International Markets , 1990 .

[20]  Scott Shane,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Selling University Technology: Patterns from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Gary D. Libecap.  University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer , 2005 .

[23]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Uncertainty in the transaction environment: an empirical test , 1998 .

[24]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Science Business: The Promise, the Reality, and the Future of Biotech , 2006 .

[25]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  The Knowledge Filter and Economic Growth: The Role of Scientist Entrepreneurship , 2006 .

[26]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  Analyzing the Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education , 2005 .

[27]  J. Gans,et al.  The Product Market and the Market for 'Ideas': Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[28]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2002 .

[29]  Mike Wright,et al.  The Formation of High-Tech University Spinouts: The Role of Joint Ventures and Venture Capital Investors , 2004 .

[30]  Fred Pries,et al.  ‘Repeat commercializers,’ the ‘habitual entrepreneurs’ of university–industry technology transfer , 2009 .

[31]  O. Williamson.  Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[32]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Disentangling the Theories of Firm Boundaries: A Path Model and Empirical Test , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Elizabeth Garnsey,et al.  Do Academic Spin-Outs Differ and Does it Matter? , 2004 .

[34]  M. Dowling,et al.  Commercialization strategies of young biotechnology firms: An empirical analysis of the U.S. industry , 2008 .

[35]  David H. Hsu,et al.  When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction? , 2000 .

[36]  J. Oxley.  Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: the impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances , 1999 .

[37]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The Basics Of Social Research , 1998 .