Three-dimensional tissue scaffolds from interbonded poly(ε-caprolactone) fibrous matrices with controlled porosity.

In this article, we report on the preparation and cell culture performance of a novel fibrous matrix that has an interbonded fiber architecture, excellent pore interconnectivity, and controlled pore size and porosity. The fibrous matrices were prepared by combining melt-bonding of short synthetic fibers with a template leaching technique. The microcomputed tomography and scanning electron microscopy imaging verified that the fibers in the matrix were highly bonded, forming unique isotropic pore architectures. The average pore size and porosity of the fibrous matrices were controlled by the fiber/template ratio. The matrices having the average pore size of 120, 207, 813, and 994 μm, with the respective porosity of 73%, 88%, 96%, and 97%, were investigated. The applicability of the matrix as a three-dimensional (3D) tissue scaffold for cell culture was demonstrated with two cell lines, rat skin fibroblast and Chinese hamster ovary, and the influences of the matrix porosity and surface area on the cell culture performance were examined. Both cell lines grew successfully in the matrices, but they showed different preferences in pore size and porosity. Compared with two-dimensional tissue culture plates, the cell number on 3D fibrous matrices was increased by 97.27% for the Chinese hamster ovary cells and 49.46% for the fibroblasts after 21 days of culture. The fibroblasts in the matrices not only grew along the fiber surface but also bridged among the fibers, which was much different from those on two-dimensional scaffolds. Such an interbonded fibrous matrix may be useful for developing new fiber-based 3D tissue scaffolds for various cell culture applications.

[1]  A. Mak,et al.  Hydraulic Permeability of Polyglycolic Acid Scaffolds as a Function of Biomaterial Degradation , 2005, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[2]  Shangtian Yang,et al.  Tissue Engineering Human Placenta Trophoblast Cells in 3‐D Fibrous Matrix: Spatial Effects on Cell Proliferation and Function , 1999, Biotechnology progress.

[3]  Robert Langer,et al.  Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering , 1994, Bio/Technology.

[4]  L. Hanley,et al.  Preparation and analysis of macroporous TiO2 films on Ti surfaces for bone-tissue implants. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  Sheng Lin-Gibson,et al.  X-ray microcomputed tomography for the measurement of cell adhesionand proliferation in polymer scaffolds. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[6]  B D Boyan,et al.  Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[7]  Mário A. Barbosa,et al.  Polysaccharides as scaffolds for bone regeneration , 2005 .

[8]  Antonios G. Mikos,et al.  Pore Morphology Effects on the Fibrovascular Tissue Growth in Porous Polymer Substrates , 1994, Cell transplantation.

[9]  Pieter Buma,et al.  Tissue ingrowth and degradation of two biodegradable porous polymers with different porosities and pore sizes. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[10]  Robert Langer,et al.  Preparation and characterization of poly(l-lactic acid) foams , 1994 .

[11]  I. Yannas,et al.  Applications of ECM analogs in surgery , 1994, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[12]  大槻 文悟,et al.  Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants : three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants , 2007 .

[13]  Dietmar W Hutmacher,et al.  A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[14]  Chaozong Liu,et al.  Design and Development of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering , 2007 .

[15]  Ioannis V. Yannas,et al.  Biologically Active Analogues of the Extracellular Matrix: Artificial Skin and Nerves† , 1990 .

[16]  Hyoungshin Park,et al.  Mechanical properties and remodeling of hybrid cardiac constructs made from heart cells, fibrin, and biodegradable, elastomeric knitted fabric. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[17]  R Langer,et al.  Novel approach to fabricate porous sponges of poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) without the use of organic solvents. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[18]  H. Takita,et al.  Geometry of Carriers Controlling Phenotypic Expression in BMP-Induced Osteogenesis and Chondrogenesis , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  Joseph W Freeman,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament regeneration using braided biodegradable scaffolds: in vitro optimization studies. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[20]  M. Birch,et al.  Microcellular polyHIPE polymer supports osteoblast growth and bone formation in vitro. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[21]  T. Ma,et al.  Thermal compression and characterization of three-dimensional nonwoven PET matrices as tissue engineering scaffolds. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[22]  Joseph W Freeman,et al.  Fiber-based tissue-engineered scaffold for ligament replacement: design considerations and in vitro evaluation. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[23]  Shangtian Yang,et al.  Effects of Filtration Seeding on Cell Density, Spatial Distribution, and Proliferation in Nonwoven Fibrous Matrices , 2001, Biotechnology progress.

[24]  D. Prescott,et al.  CHANGES IN SURFACE MORPHOLOGY OF CHINESE HAMSTER OVARY CELLS DURING THE CELL CYCLE , 1973, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  R. Rubin,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CELL-TO-CELL CONTACT ON THE SURFACE MORPHOLOGY OF CHINESE HAMSTER OVARY CELLS , 1973, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  Martin Schuler,et al.  Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[27]  H. Takita,et al.  Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced osteogenesis. , 1997, Journal of biochemistry.

[28]  Shuguang Zhang.  Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular self-assembly , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[29]  S. Ghosh,et al.  Effects of Fiber Blends and Needling Parameters on Needlepunched Moldable Nonwoven Fabric , 2002 .

[30]  T. Park,et al.  Biodegradable polymeric microcellular foams by modified thermally induced phase separation method. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[31]  L G Griffith,et al.  Integration of surface modification and 3D fabrication techniques to prepare patterned poly(L-lactide) substrates allowing regionally selective cell adhesion. , 1998, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[32]  A Curtis,et al.  Topographical control of cells. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[33]  N. Gadegaard,et al.  3D polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2006, Nanomedicine.

[34]  J. G. Cory,et al.  Use of an aqueous soluble tetrazolium/formazan assay for cell growth assays in culture. , 1991, Cancer communications.

[35]  L G Griffith,et al.  Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[36]  J. Jansen,et al.  Cell and tissue behavior on micro-grooved surfaces , 2001, Odontology.

[37]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Effects of substratum morphology on cell physiology , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[38]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  A biomimetic three-dimensional woven composite scaffold for functional tissue engineering of cartilage. , 2007, Nature materials.

[39]  Smadar Cohen,et al.  Liver tissue engineering within alginate scaffolds: effects of cell-seeding density on hepatocyte viability, morphology, and function. , 2003, Tissue engineering.