Evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration's Specialty Care Transformational Initiatives to Promote Patient-Centered Delivery of Specialty Care: A Mixed-Methods Approach.

INTRODUCTION Veteran's Affairs Office of Specialty Care (OSC) launched four national initiatives (Electronic-Consults [e-Consults], Specialty Care Access Networks-Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes [SCAN-ECHO], Mini-Residencies, and Specialty Care Neighborhood) to improve specialty care delivery and funded a center to evaluate the initiatives. METHODS The evaluation, guided by two implementation frameworks, provides formative (administrator/provider interviews and surveys) and summative data (quantitative data on patterns of use) about the initiatives to OSC. RESULTS Evaluation of initiative implementation is assessed through CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research)-grounded qualitative interviews to identify barriers/facilitators. Depending on high or low implementation, factors such as receiving workload credit, protected time, existing workflow/systems compatibility, leadership engagement, and access to information/resources were considered implementation barriers or facilitators. Findings were shared with OSC and used to further refine implementation at additional sites. Evaluation of other initiatives is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS The mixed-methods approach has provided timely information to OSC about initiative effect and impacted OSC policies on implementation at additional sites.

[1]  G. Su,et al.  Access to Outpatient Specialty Care , 2015, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[2]  A. Kempe,et al.  Importance of mixed methods in pragmatic trials and dissemination and implementation research. , 2013, Academic pediatrics.

[3]  Dawn Dowding,et al.  Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences John W. Creswell, Ann Carroll Klassen, Vicki L. Plano Clark, Katherine Clegg Smith for the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research; Qualitative Methods Overview Jo Moriarty , 2013 .

[4]  T. Wagner,et al.  Recent trends in Veterans Affairs chronic condition spending. , 2011, Population health management.

[5]  T. Lake,et al.  Coordinating Care in the Medical Neighborhood: Critical Components and Available Mechanisms. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , 2011 .

[6]  N. Kirschner,et al.  The patient-centered medical home neighbor. , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  J. Lowery,et al.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[8]  Christopher B Forrest,et al.  A typology of specialists' clinical roles. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  M. Kushel,et al.  Not Perfect, but Better: Primary Care Providers’ Experiences with Electronic Referrals in a Safety Net Health System , 2009, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[10]  Sanjeev Arora,et al.  Project ECHO: Linking University Specialists with Rural and Prison-Based Clinicians to Improve Care for People with Chronic Hepatitis C in New Mexico , 2007, Public health reports.

[11]  E. Sobo,et al.  Rapid Assessment with Qualitative Telephone Interviews: Lessons from an Evaluation of California’s Healthy Families Program & Medi-Cal for Children , 2003 .

[12]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. , 1999, American journal of public health.