Stroke Quality Metrics: Systematic Reviews of the Relationships to Patient-Centered Outcomes and Impact of Public Reporting
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Eric E. Smith,et al. Are Quality Improvements in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Program Related to Better Care or Better Data Documentation? , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.
[2] M. Shah,et al. Association between stroke center hospitalization for acute ischemic stroke and mortality. , 2011, JAMA.
[3] G. Andersen,et al. Processes of Care and Medical Complications in Patients With Stroke , 2011, Stroke.
[4] J. Jeng,et al. Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Performance Indicators: Surveillance of Stroke Care in the Taiwan Stroke Registry: Get With The Guidelines-Stroke in Taiwan , 2010, Circulation.
[5] Eric T. Bradlow,et al. Public reporting on hospital process improvements is linked to better patient outcomes. , 2010, Health affairs.
[6] Eric E. Smith,et al. Development of Stroke Performance Measures: Definitions, Methods, and Current Measures , 2010, Stroke.
[7] J. Concato,et al. Processes of care associated with acute stroke outcomes. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.
[8] Eric E. Smith,et al. Characteristics, Performance Measures, and In-Hospital Outcomes of the First One Million Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Admissions in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.
[9] Peter C Austin,et al. Effectiveness of public report cards for improving the quality of cardiac care: the EFFECT study: a randomized trial. , 2009, JAMA.
[10] Li Liang,et al. Get With the Guidelines–Stroke Is Associated With Sustained Improvement in Care for Patients Hospitalized With Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack , 2009, Circulation.
[11] C. Benesch,et al. Public Reporting of Quality Data for Stroke: Is It Measuring Quality? , 2008, Stroke.
[12] Arnold Milstein,et al. Reductions in Mortality Associated With Intensive Public Reporting of Hospital Outcomes , 2008, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.
[13] E W Steyerberg,et al. Variation between hospitals in patient outcome after stroke is only partly explained by differences in quality of care: results from the Netherlands Stroke Survey , 2008, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.
[14] P. Shekelle,et al. Systematic Review: The Evidence That Publishing Patient Care Performance Data Improves Quality of Care , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[15] L. Pedersen,et al. Quality of Care and Mortality Among Patients With Stroke: A Nationwide Follow-up Study , 2008, Medical care.
[16] R. Lilford,et al. What is the empirical evidence that hospitals with higher-risk adjusted mortality rates provide poorer quality care? A systematic review of the literature , 2007, BMC Health Services Research.
[17] Peter Langhorne,et al. Stroke Units in Their Natural Habitat: Systematic Review of Observational Studies , 2007, Stroke.
[18] Nancy M Albert,et al. Association between performance measures and clinical outcomes for patients hospitalized with heart failure. , 2007, JAMA.
[19] Eric T. Bradlow,et al. Relationship between Medicare's hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates. , 2006, JAMA.
[20] G. Mensah,et al. The Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry: initial results from four prototypes. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.
[21] R. Steinbrook. Public report cards--cardiac surgery and beyond. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.
[22] Harlan M Krumholz,et al. Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality. , 2006, JAMA.
[23] Elizabeth R DeLong,et al. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Association Between Hospital Process Performance and Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2022 .
[24] D. Asch,et al. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. , 2005, JAMA.
[25] S. Johnston,et al. Do the Brain Attack Coalition’s criteria for stroke centers improve care for ischemic stroke? , 2005, Neurology.
[26] J. Raftery,et al. Comparing processes of stroke care in high- and low-mortality hospitals in the West Midlands, UK. , 2005, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.
[27] G. Borsboom,et al. The role of 'confounding by indication' in assessing the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes in general practice: results of a case-control study , 2005, BMC health services research.
[28] Richard Lilford,et al. Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma , 2004, The Lancet.
[29] D. Goldfarb. Patients at the centre: in our practice, and in our use of language , 2004, ACP journal club.
[30] William Taylor,et al. Relationship Between Process and Outcome in Stroke Care , 2003, Stroke.
[31] Donald M. Berwick,et al. Connections Between Quality Measurement and Improvement , 2003, Medical care.
[32] Helen Hoenig,et al. Structure, Process, and Outcomes in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2002, Medical care.
[33] Helen Hoenig,et al. Postacute stroke guideline compliance is associated with greater patient satisfaction. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[34] P. Gompertz,et al. Stroke care: how do we measure quality? , 2002, Postgraduate medical journal.
[35] Silvana Quaglini,et al. Guideline Compliance Improves Stroke Outcome: A Preliminary Study in 4 Districts in the Italian Region of Lombardia , 2002, Stroke.
[36] P. Duncan,et al. Adherence to Postacute Rehabilitation Guidelines Is Associated With Functional Recovery in Stroke , 2002, Stroke.
[37] Alastair Baker,et al. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[38] N. Weir,et al. Towards a National System for Monitoring the Quality of Hospital-Based Stroke Services , 2001, Stroke.
[39] Stephen MacMahon,et al. Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity, II: observational studies , 2001, The Lancet.
[40] R H Brook,et al. The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. , 2000, JAMA.
[41] B. McNeil,et al. Measuring and improving quality of care: a report from the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology First Scientific Forum on Assessment of Healthcare Quality in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke. , 2000, Circulation.
[42] B. McNeil,et al. Measuring and improving quality of care : A report from the american heart Association/American college of cardiology first scientific forum on assessment of healthcare quality in cardiovascular disease and stroke , 2000, Stroke.
[43] A. Furlan,et al. Is in-hospital stroke mortality an accurate measure of quality of care? , 1998, Neurology.
[44] J. Slattery,et al. How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials. Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration. , 1997, Stroke.
[45] A. Walker. Confounding by indication. , 1996, Epidemiology.
[46] A. Shroyer,et al. Why it is Important to Demonstrate Linkages Between Outcomes of Care and Processes and Structures of Care , 1995, Medical care.
[47] Jonathan Mant,et al. Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarction , 1995, BMJ.
[48] D Draper,et al. Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. , 1990, JAMA.
[49] W Wieners,et al. On measuring quality. , 1988, Computers in healthcare.
[50] Robert H. Brook,et al. Hospital Inpatient Mortality , 1987 .
[51] R. Brook,et al. Hospital inpatient mortality. Is it a predictor of quality? , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.
[52] Sumon YusufPhotoshare. Care , 1890, The Hospital.