Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: qualitative study of participants' views

Abstract Objective To explore trial participants' responses to receiving a summary of the results of a trial in pregnancy. Design Qualitative study with semistructured interviews. Participants 20 women who had when pregnant participated in the ORACLE trial of antibiotics for preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranes and requested a copy of the trial results. Results Less than a fifth of women who participated in the ORACLE trial indicated that they wished to receive the trial results. Reactions to the leaflet summarising the trial results were generally positive or neutral, although some women had difficulty in understanding the leaflet, and there was evidence of possible negative implications for women who had adverse outcomes. Women requested the results because they were interested in being able to complete their own personal narrative. They wished to know to which arm of the trial they had been allocated and the implications for their own pregnancy, and they were disappointed with receiving a generic summary. Women's accounts indicated some confusion about the trial findings. Conclusions Recommendations that research participants be routinely provided with the results of studies have been made without the benefit of research to show the consequences of doing this or how it should best be managed. Caution is needed, as is more evaluation of how feedback of results should be handled, and assessment of the risks, benefits, and costs.

[1]  R Smith,et al.  The rights of patients in research , 1995, BMJ.

[2]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[3]  D. Elbourne,et al.  Reactions of participants to the results of a randomised controlled trial: exploratory study , 1998, BMJ.

[4]  Charles Weijer,et al.  Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative. , 2003, IRB.

[5]  S. Kenyon,et al.  What do they know?: a content analysis of women's perceptions of trial information , 2004, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[6]  Marc Taylor,et al.  Research governance framework for health and social care. , 2002, Health & social care in the community.

[7]  C. Weijer,et al.  Considerations and costs of disclosing study findings to research participants , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[8]  M Gwinn,et al.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics. , 2001, JAMA.

[9]  E. Winer,et al.  Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative study , 2005, The Lancet.

[10]  W. Tarnow-Mordi,et al.  Broad-spectrum antibiotics for spontaneous preterm labour: the ORACLE II randomised trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[11]  E. Winer,et al.  Informing clinical trial participants about study results. , 2002, JAMA.

[12]  C. Sklar,et al.  Impact on survivors of retinoblastoma when informed of study results on risk of second cancers. , 2003, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[13]  P. Pharoah,et al.  Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer , 2003, Journal of medical ethics.

[14]  J. López How sociology can save bioethics . . . maybe. , 2004, Sociology of health & illness.

[15]  S. Edwards,et al.  Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[16]  N. Pfeffer Information and consent forms should use short words and sentences , 1996, BMJ.

[17]  E. Winer,et al.  Do patients participating in clinical trials want to know study results? , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  J. Kleijnen,et al.  Reactions to treatment debriefing among the participants of a placebo controlled trial , 2005, BMC health services research.

[19]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Evolving the multiple roles of ‘patients’ in health‐care research: reflections after involvement in a trial of shared decision‐making , 2003, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[20]  S. Kenyon,et al.  Broad-spectrum antibiotics for preterm, prelabour rupture of fetal membranes: the ORACLE I randomised trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[21]  Broad-spectrum antibiotics for preterm, prelabour rupture of fetal membranes: the ORACLE I randomised trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[22]  V. Marzinotto,et al.  DISSEMINATION TO RESEARCH SUBJECTS: OPERATIONALIZING INVESTIGATOR ACCOUNTABILITY , 2005, Accountability in research.

[23]  M Dixon-Woods,et al.  Writing wrongs? An analysis of published discourses about the use of patient information leaflets. , 2001, Social science & medicine.