Customer and Frontline Employee Influence on New Service Development Performance

Service firms recognize the key role that product and process innovation play in building and sustaining competitive advantage in the marketplace. This empirical study tests a model of new service development (NSD) that enhances performance outcomes by prescribing specific roles for customers and frontline employees in the NSD process. Findings are based on in-depth managerial interviews and survey data collected from 160 organizations across a variety of service sectors. The results support hypotheses that customer and frontline employee participation in specific stages of the NSD process indirectly affects sales performance and project development efficiency outcomes. Positive effects are mediated by the new service success factors of service marketability and launch preparation. To produce successful new services, firms should involve customers in the design and development stages to help identify market opportunities, generate and evaluate new service ideas, define desired benefits and features of the potential service, and provide extensive feedback for product and market testing. Frontline employees are less effective than previously thought as a source of new service ideas. Firms should instead focus on incorporating those personnel in the full launch stage to effectively promote and deliver the new service.

[1]  Gary R. Schirr,et al.  Growth and Development of a Body of Knowledge: 16 Years of New Product Development Research, 1989-2004 , 2008 .

[2]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs , 2006 .

[4]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Managing User Involvement in Service Innovation , 2003 .

[5]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  Fredrik Dahlsten,et al.  Avoiding the Customer Satisfaction Rut , 2003 .

[7]  C. Perry,et al.  A customer‐oriented new service development process , 2002 .

[8]  I. Alam.  An exploratory investigation of user involvement in new service development , 2002 .

[9]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[10]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Russel L. Thompson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys , 2000 .

[12]  R. B. Chase,et al.  A Critical Evaluation of the New Service Development Process: Integrating Service Innovation and Service Design , 2000 .

[13]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[14]  Knowlton W. Johnson.  Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: Testing a Theory for Research Use , 1998 .

[15]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[16]  A. Johne,et al.  New service development: a review of the literature and annotated bibliography , 1998 .

[17]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  Key Concepts for New Service Development , 1996 .

[18]  D. A. Horne,et al.  Level of success inputs for service innovations in the same firm , 1995 .

[19]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. , 1995 .

[20]  Gary W. Loveman,et al.  Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work , 1994 .

[21]  Ulrike de Brentani.  Success Factors in Developing New Business Services , 1991 .

[22]  Eugene M. Johnson,et al.  A Proposed Model for New Service Development , 1989 .

[23]  Michael R. Bowers,et al.  Developing New Services: Improving the Process Makes it Better , 1989 .

[24]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[25]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[27]  Harsharanjeet S. Jagpal.  Multicollinearity in Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables , 1982 .

[28]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[29]  C. Clogg.  Characterizing The Class Organization Of Labor Market Opportunity , 1980 .

[30]  G L MADDOX,et al.  A critical evaluation , 2012 .