Design and Characterisation of Cross-sectional Geometries for Soft Robotic Manipulators with Fibre-reinforced Chambers

Fluid elastomer actuators are a prevalent design paradigm in the field of soft robotics. To prevent the elastomer from ballooning and increase the actuation consistency, a fibre-reinforced design is commonly utilised, with the effect of the fibre angle on the robot's performance well established. However, the impact of the geometry of the fibre-reinforced chambers has not been tested. This paper explores two chamber geometries, circular and semi-circular, using measurements in alignment with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to determine if there is a difference in performance. The fabrication process of robots with different chamber geometries is first streamlined, then the characterisation of each robot is experimentally identified. The results show the chamber geometry plays an important role in affecting the performance of the robots, e.g., with a stiffness variation greater than 20% between the two designs.

[1]  Huichan Zhao,et al.  Fiber-reinforced soft polymeric manipulator with smart motion scaling and stiffness tunability , 2021, Cell Reports Physical Science.

[2]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Fusing Dexterity and Perception for Soft Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery: What We Learnt from STIFF-FLOP , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[3]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  Screw theory-based stiffness analysis for a fluidic-driven soft robotic manipulator , 2021, 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[4]  Danail Stoyanov,et al.  A Fluidic Soft Robot for Needle Guidance and Motion Compensation in Intratympanic Steroid Injections , 2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[5]  Tianmiao Wang,et al.  A soft manipulator for efficient delicate grasping in shallow water: Modeling, control, and real-world experiments , 2020, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[6]  Fernando Bello,et al.  Toward a Common Framework and Database of Materials for Soft Robotics. , 2020, Soft robotics.

[7]  Calogero Maria Oddo,et al.  Fluidic Haptic Interface for Mechano-Tactile Feedback , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[8]  Gastone Ciuti,et al.  A Soft Pneumatic Inchworm Double balloon (SPID) for colonoscopy , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Soft Fiber-Reinforced Pneumatic Actuator Design and Fabrication: Towards Robust, Soft Robotic Systems , 2019, TAROS.

[10]  Elena De Momi,et al.  Sizing the aortic annulus with a robotised, commercially available soft balloon catheter: in vitro study on idealised phantoms , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[11]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Elasticity Versus Hyperelasticity Considerations in Quasistatic Modeling of a Soft Finger-Like Robotic Appendage for Real-Time Position and Force Estimation. , 2019, Soft robotics.

[12]  Samia Nefti-Meziani,et al.  The Design and Mathematical Model of a Novel Variable Stiffness Extensor-Contractor Pneumatic Artificial Muscle. , 2018, Soft robotics.

[13]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Bio-Inspired Octopus Robot Based on Novel Soft Fluidic Actuator , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[14]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Highly dexterous 2‐module soft robot for intra‐organ navigation in minimally invasive surgery , 2018, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[15]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Soft fluidic rotary actuator with improved actuation properties , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[16]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Soft Robotics: Review of Fluid‐Driven Intrinsically Soft Devices; Manufacturing, Sensing, Control, and Applications in Human‐Robot Interaction   , 2017 .

[17]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Variable Stiffness Link (VSL): Toward inherently safe robotic manipulators , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[18]  Arianna Menciassi,et al.  A Soft Modular Manipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery: Design and Characterization of a Single Module , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[19]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Tendon-Based Stiffening for a Pneumatically Actuated Soft Manipulator , 2016, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[20]  Yi Sun,et al.  A Miniature Soft Robotic Manipulator Based on Novel Fabrication Methods , 2016, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[21]  Arianna Menciassi,et al.  Modular soft mechatronic manipulator for minimally invasive surgery (MIS): overall architecture and development of a fully integrated soft module , 2015 .

[22]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Lecture Notes in Computer Science: An Antagonistic Actuation Technique for Simultaneous Stiffness and Position Control , 2015, ICIRA.

[23]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[24]  Arianna Menciassi,et al.  New STIFF-FLOP module construction idea for improved actuation and sensing , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[25]  P. Polygerinos,et al.  Mechanical Programming of Soft Actuators by Varying Fiber Angle , 2015 .

[26]  Daniela Rus,et al.  A Recipe for Soft Fluidic Elastomer Robots , 2015, Soft robotics.

[27]  Tao Geng,et al.  Design optimisation of soft silicone pneumatic actuators using finite element analysis , 2014, 2014 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics.

[28]  H. Tanaka,et al.  Applying a flexible microactuator to robotic mechanisms , 1992, IEEE Control Systems.

[29]  A. Arezzo,et al.  Soft robotic systems for endoscopic interventions , 2022, Endorobotics.

[30]  T. Nanayakkara,et al.  Soft Robotics Technologies to Address Shortcomings in Today ’ s Minimally Invasive Surgery : The STIFF-FLOP Approach , 2014 .