Intensity-modulated radiotherapy as primary treatment for prostate cancer: acute toxicity in 114 patients.

INTRODUCTION Dose escalation improves local control in prostate cancer. At Ghent University Hospital, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is used to increase the dose to the prostate and/or seminal vesicles. We report on acute toxicity in 114 patients who received IMRT for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was initiated after approval of our ethics committee. A class solution was used to plan all cases. Three beams (gantry 0 degrees , 116 degrees , and 244 degrees ) and anatomy-based segmentation were used to create an intensity-modulated dose distribution. Maximal rectal dose was set at 2 Gy per fraction. Detailed dose-volume histograms for all relevant structures were present. For all patients, we determined the pretreatment morbidity by a detailed preradiotherapy, in-house developed symptom scale. All patients were treated with 18 MV photons of an Elekta linear accelerator. Patients were seen on a weekly basis during treatment, and 1 month (M1) and 3 months (M3) thereafter. The registration of acute toxicity was standardized by a fixed questionnaire. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity scale served as a basis, but additional symptoms, such as rectal blood loss, urgency, and incontinence, were scored as well. RESULTS All 114 IMRT plans were delivered successfully without any interruption or technical problem. Daily treatment time was always less than 8 min and less than 6 min in 90% of the cases. Grade 1 and Grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were observed in 44% and 29% of the patients, respectively, during the whole period. If only the RTOG scale was used, Grade 1 and Grade 2 GI toxicities were noted in 39% and 27% of the patients, respectively, leaving 34% free of acute RTOG-scaled toxicity. Grade 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicity was seen in 8 patients (7%), all but 1 during treatment. Grade 2 and Grade 1 GU toxicities were seen in 36% and 47% of the patients, respectively, leaving only 10% free of acute GU toxicity. DISCUSSION Anatomy-based IMRT to treat prostate cancer is incorporated into our daily routine without any problem. Acute toxicity is very low. Most of the recorded symptoms decrease over time, except for GI urgency and incontinence. The incorporation of additional symptoms makes the scoring more detailed.

[1]  L. Gras,et al.  Estimation of the incidence of late bladder and rectum complications after high-dose (70-78 GY) conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer, using dose-volume histograms. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  D. Kuban,et al.  High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer , 2004, Current urology reports.

[3]  G Starkschall,et al.  Conventional vs. conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary results of dosimetry and acute toxicity. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  George Starkschall,et al.  Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  R. Pötter,et al.  Rectal sequelae after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer: dose-volume histograms as predictive factors. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Michael J. Zelefsky,et al.  High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  R. Fraser,et al.  Chronic effects of therapeutic irradiation for localized prostatic carcinoma on anorectal function. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  C. Ling,et al.  The feasibility of dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with prostatic carcinoma. , 1995, The cancer journal from Scientific American.

[9]  F. Claus,et al.  In response to Drs. Vaarkamp and Krasin , 2001 .

[10]  T. Pajak,et al.  Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  P. Rubin,et al.  Long-term treatment sequelae following external beam irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate: analysis of RTOG studies 7506 and 7706. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  D. Joseph,et al.  Acute symptoms, not rectally administered sucralfate, predict for late radiation proctitis: longer term follow-up of a phase III trial--Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  E. B. Butler,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer with the use of a rectal balloon for prostate immobilization: acute toxicity and dose-volume analysis. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Rick Chappell,et al.  Rectal dose sparing with a balloon catheter and ultrasound localization in conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  A. Markoe,et al.  Preliminary report of toxicity following 3D radiation therapy for prostate cancer on 3DOG/RTOG 9406. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  A. Zietman,et al.  Radical radiation for localized prostate cancer: local persistence of disease results in a late wave of metastases. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  W. De Gersem,et al.  An anatomy-based beam segmentation tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and its application to head-and-neck cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  G Starkschall,et al.  Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  P. Rust,et al.  Dose-volume relationship for acute side effects during high dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  W. De Gersem,et al.  Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  R. Fraser,et al.  Evidence for efficacy without increased toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: early results of a Phase III randomized trial. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  A. Markoe,et al.  Interim report of toxicity from 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer on 3DOG/RTOG 9406, level III (79.2 Gy). , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  M. Piérart,et al.  Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  C. Ling,et al.  Late rectal toxicity after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer (I): multivariate analysis and dose-response. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Locally advanced prostatic cancer: long-term toxicity outcome after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy--a dose-escalation study. , 1998, Radiology.

[27]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Preliminary observations on biochemical relapse-free survival rates after short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 Gy at 2.5 Gy/fraction) for localized prostate cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  B Pickett,et al.  Indications for and the significance of seminal vesicle irradiation during 3D conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  A Pollack,et al.  Complications from radiotherapy dose escalation in prostate cancer: preliminary results of a randomized trial. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.