New image statistics for detecting disturbed galaxy morphologies at high redshift

Testing theories of hierarchical structure formation requires estimating the distribution of galaxy morphologies and its change with redshift. One aspect of this investigation involves identifying galaxies with disturbed morphologies (e.g. merging galaxies). This is often done by summarizing galaxy images using, e.g. the concentration, asymmetry and clumpiness and Gini-M20 statistics of Conselice and Lotz et al., respectively, and associating particular statistic values with disturbance. We introduce three statistics that enhance detection of disturbed morphologies at high redshift (z ∼ 2): the multimode (M), intensity (I) and deviation (D) statistics. We show their effectiveness by training a machine-learning classifier, random forest, using 1639 galaxies observed in the H band by the Hubble Space Telescope WFC3, galaxies that had been previously classified by eye by the Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey collaboration. We find that the MID statistics (and the A statistic of Conselice) are the most useful for identifying disturbed morphologies. We also explore whether human annotators are useful for identifying disturbed morphologies. We demonstrate that they show limited ability to detect disturbance at high redshift, and that increasing their number beyond ≈10 does not provably yield better classification performance. We propose a simulation-based model-fitting algorithm that mitigates these issues by bypassing annotation.

[1]  Casey Papovich,et al.  A Direct Measurement of Major Galaxy Mergers at z 3 , 2003 .

[2]  B. J. Weiner,et al.  accepted to the Astrophysical Journal Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY MERGERS AND MORPHOLOGY AT Z < 1.2 IN THE EXTENDED GROTH STRIP , 2007 .

[3]  Stefano Casertano,et al.  CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3754.

[4]  Joel R. Primack,et al.  The effect of gas fraction on the morphology and time-scales of disc galaxy mergers , 2009, 0912.1593.

[5]  J. Moustakas,et al.  AEGIS: THE MORPHOLOGIES OF GREEN GALAXIES AT 0.4 < z < 1.2 , 2011, 1101.3353.

[6]  C. Lintott,et al.  Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2008, 0804.4483.

[7]  M. Nonino,et al.  A DETAILED STUDY OF PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS FOR GOODS-SOUTH GALAXIES , 2010, 1009.3504.

[8]  M. Sullivan,et al.  THE CFHTLS-DEEP CATALOG OF INTERACTING GALAXIES. I. MERGER RATE EVOLUTION TO z = 1.2 , 2010, 1001.2772.

[9]  Anna Jangren,et al.  STRUCTURAL AND PHOTOMETRIC CLASSIFICATION OF GALAXIES. I. CALIBRATION BASED ON A NEARBY GALAXY SAMPLE , 2000 .

[10]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[11]  Christian Wolf,et al.  A new automatic method to identify galaxy mergers – I. Description and application to the Space Telescope A901/902 Galaxy Evolution Survey★ , 2011, 1109.6828.

[12]  L. Ho,et al.  Detailed structural decomposition of galaxy images , 2002, astro-ph/0204182.

[13]  Cosmology,et al.  Quantified H i morphology – I. Multi-wavelength analysis of the THINGS galaxies , 2011, 1104.3291.

[14]  Joel R. Primack,et al.  The Rest-Frame Far-Ultraviolet Morphologies of Star-Forming Galaxies at z ~ 1.5 and 4 , 2006 .

[15]  E. Bertin,et al.  SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .

[16]  P. Madau,et al.  A NEW NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH TO GALAXY MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION , 2003, astro-ph/0311352.

[17]  M. Yun,et al.  Smith ScholarWorks Smith ScholarWorks Color-Magnitude Relation and Morphology of Low-Redshift Color-Magnitude Relation and Morphology of Low-Redshift ULIRGs in Sloan Digital Sky Survey ULIRGs in Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2018 .

[18]  Matthew A. Bershady,et al.  The asymmetry of galaxies: physical morphology for nearby and high redshift galaxies , 1999 .

[19]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[20]  A. Koekemoer,et al.  The Tumultuous Formation of the Hubble Sequence at z > 1 Examined with HST/WFC3 Observations of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field , 2011, 1105.2522.

[21]  Frank van den Bosch,et al.  MERGERS IN ΛCDM: UNCERTAINTIES IN THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS OF THE MERGER RATE , 2010, 1004.2708.

[22]  S. Ravindranath,et al.  CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3753.

[23]  Thorsten Lisker,et al.  Is the Gini Coefficient a Stable Measure of Galaxy Structure? , 2008, 0807.1531.

[24]  D. Thompson,et al.  A MULTIWAVELENGTH STUDY OF A SAMPLE OF 70 μm SELECTED GALAXIES IN THE COSMOS FIELD. II. THE ROLE OF MERGERS IN GALAXY EVOLUTION , 2010, 1006.4956.

[25]  C. Conselice,et al.  The structures of distant galaxies – I. Galaxy structures and the merger rate to z∼ 3 in the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field , 2007, 0711.2333.

[26]  Carlos Hoyos,et al.  THE STRUCTURES AND TOTAL (MINOR + MAJOR) MERGER HISTORIES OF MASSIVE GALAXIES UP TO z ∼ 3 IN THE HST GOODS NICMOS SURVEY: A POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO THE SIZE EVOLUTION PROBLEM , 2011, 1111.5662.

[27]  Joel R. Primack,et al.  The effect of mass ratio on the morphology and time-scales of disc galaxy mergers: Effect of mass ratio on merger morphology , 2009, 0912.1590.

[28]  A. S. Szalay,et al.  Galaxy Zoo: the fraction of merging galaxies in the SDSS and their morphologies , 2009, 0903.4937.

[29]  Max Pettini,et al.  The Physical Nature of Rest-UV Galaxy Morphology During the Peak Epoch of Galaxy Formation , 2007 .

[30]  Kyle R. Stewart,et al.  THE MAJOR AND MINOR GALAXY MERGER RATES AT z < 1.5 , 2011, 1108.2508.

[31]  C. Conselice,et al.  A comparison of galaxy merger history observations and predictions from semi-analytic models , 2009, 0904.2365.

[32]  University of Toronto,et al.  A New Approach to Galaxy Morphology. I. Analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Early Data Release , 2003, astro-ph/0301239.

[33]  H. Rix,et al.  HISTORY OF GALAXY INTERACTIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON STAR FORMATION OVER THE LAST 7 Gyr FROM GEMS , 2009, 0903.3700.

[34]  Christopher J. Conselice,et al.  The Relationship between Stellar Light Distributions of Galaxies and Their Formation Histories , 2003 .