New image statistics for detecting disturbed galaxy morphologies at high redshift
暂无分享,去创建一个
C. J. Conselice | A. B. Lee | C. Conselice | J. Newman | P. Freeman | J. Lotz | Rafael Izbicki | M. Mozena | A. M. Koekemoer | M. Mozena | J. A. Newman | P. E. Freeman | R. Izbicki | J. M. Lotz | A. Koekemoer | A. Koekemoer
[1] Casey Papovich,et al. A Direct Measurement of Major Galaxy Mergers at z 3 , 2003 .
[2] B. J. Weiner,et al. accepted to the Astrophysical Journal Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY MERGERS AND MORPHOLOGY AT Z < 1.2 IN THE EXTENDED GROTH STRIP , 2007 .
[3] Stefano Casertano,et al. CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3754.
[4] Joel R. Primack,et al. The effect of gas fraction on the morphology and time-scales of disc galaxy mergers , 2009, 0912.1593.
[5] J. Moustakas,et al. AEGIS: THE MORPHOLOGIES OF GREEN GALAXIES AT 0.4 < z < 1.2 , 2011, 1101.3353.
[6] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2008, 0804.4483.
[7] M. Nonino,et al. A DETAILED STUDY OF PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS FOR GOODS-SOUTH GALAXIES , 2010, 1009.3504.
[8] M. Sullivan,et al. THE CFHTLS-DEEP CATALOG OF INTERACTING GALAXIES. I. MERGER RATE EVOLUTION TO z = 1.2 , 2010, 1001.2772.
[9] Anna Jangren,et al. STRUCTURAL AND PHOTOMETRIC CLASSIFICATION OF GALAXIES. I. CALIBRATION BASED ON A NEARBY GALAXY SAMPLE , 2000 .
[10] Leo Breiman,et al. Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.
[11] Christian Wolf,et al. A new automatic method to identify galaxy mergers – I. Description and application to the Space Telescope A901/902 Galaxy Evolution Survey★ , 2011, 1109.6828.
[12] L. Ho,et al. Detailed structural decomposition of galaxy images , 2002, astro-ph/0204182.
[13] Cosmology,et al. Quantified H i morphology – I. Multi-wavelength analysis of the THINGS galaxies , 2011, 1104.3291.
[14] Joel R. Primack,et al. The Rest-Frame Far-Ultraviolet Morphologies of Star-Forming Galaxies at z ~ 1.5 and 4 , 2006 .
[15] E. Bertin,et al. SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .
[16] P. Madau,et al. A NEW NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH TO GALAXY MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION , 2003, astro-ph/0311352.
[17] M. Yun,et al. Smith ScholarWorks Smith ScholarWorks Color-Magnitude Relation and Morphology of Low-Redshift Color-Magnitude Relation and Morphology of Low-Redshift ULIRGs in Sloan Digital Sky Survey ULIRGs in Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2018 .
[18] Matthew A. Bershady,et al. The asymmetry of galaxies: physical morphology for nearby and high redshift galaxies , 1999 .
[19] Eric R. Ziegel,et al. The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.
[20] A. Koekemoer,et al. The Tumultuous Formation of the Hubble Sequence at z > 1 Examined with HST/WFC3 Observations of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field , 2011, 1105.2522.
[21] Frank van den Bosch,et al. MERGERS IN ΛCDM: UNCERTAINTIES IN THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS OF THE MERGER RATE , 2010, 1004.2708.
[22] S. Ravindranath,et al. CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3753.
[23] Thorsten Lisker,et al. Is the Gini Coefficient a Stable Measure of Galaxy Structure? , 2008, 0807.1531.
[24] D. Thompson,et al. A MULTIWAVELENGTH STUDY OF A SAMPLE OF 70 μm SELECTED GALAXIES IN THE COSMOS FIELD. II. THE ROLE OF MERGERS IN GALAXY EVOLUTION , 2010, 1006.4956.
[25] C. Conselice,et al. The structures of distant galaxies – I. Galaxy structures and the merger rate to z∼ 3 in the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field , 2007, 0711.2333.
[26] Carlos Hoyos,et al. THE STRUCTURES AND TOTAL (MINOR + MAJOR) MERGER HISTORIES OF MASSIVE GALAXIES UP TO z ∼ 3 IN THE HST GOODS NICMOS SURVEY: A POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO THE SIZE EVOLUTION PROBLEM , 2011, 1111.5662.
[27] Joel R. Primack,et al. The effect of mass ratio on the morphology and time-scales of disc galaxy mergers: Effect of mass ratio on merger morphology , 2009, 0912.1590.
[28] A. S. Szalay,et al. Galaxy Zoo: the fraction of merging galaxies in the SDSS and their morphologies , 2009, 0903.4937.
[29] Max Pettini,et al. The Physical Nature of Rest-UV Galaxy Morphology During the Peak Epoch of Galaxy Formation , 2007 .
[30] Kyle R. Stewart,et al. THE MAJOR AND MINOR GALAXY MERGER RATES AT z < 1.5 , 2011, 1108.2508.
[31] C. Conselice,et al. A comparison of galaxy merger history observations and predictions from semi-analytic models , 2009, 0904.2365.
[32] University of Toronto,et al. A New Approach to Galaxy Morphology. I. Analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Early Data Release , 2003, astro-ph/0301239.
[33] H. Rix,et al. HISTORY OF GALAXY INTERACTIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON STAR FORMATION OVER THE LAST 7 Gyr FROM GEMS , 2009, 0903.3700.
[34] Christopher J. Conselice,et al. The Relationship between Stellar Light Distributions of Galaxies and Their Formation Histories , 2003 .