Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in land surface‐atmosphere flux predictions

This study addresses the assessment of uncertainty associated with predictions of land surface-atmosphere fluxes using Bayesian Monte Carlo simulation within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) methodology. Even a simple soil vegetation-atmosphere transfer (SVAT) scheme is shown to lead to multiple acceptable parameterizations when calibration data are limited to timescales of typical intensive field campaigns. The GLUE methodology assigns a likelihood weight to each acceptable simulation. As more data become available, these likelihood weights may be updated by using Bayes equation. Application of the GLUE methodology can be shown to reveal deficiencies in model structure and the benefit of additional calibration data. The method is demonstrated with data sets taken from FIFE sites in Kansas, and ABRACOS data from the Amazon. Estimates of uncertainty are propagated for each data set revealing significant predictive uncertainty. The value of additional periods of data is then evaluated through comparing updated uncertainty estimates with previous estimates using the Shannon entropy measure.

[1]  William J. Davies,et al.  Integration of hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and water status of droughted plants , 1993 .

[2]  Keith Beven,et al.  On the sensitivity of soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer (SVAT) schemes: equifinality and the problem of robust calibration , 1997 .

[3]  Garik Gutman,et al.  On Modeling Dynamics of Geobotanic State–Climate Interaction , 1986 .

[4]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information , 1988 .

[5]  Keith Beven,et al.  The introduction of macroscale hydrological complexity into land surface-atmosphere transfer models and the effect on planetary boundary layer development. , 1995 .

[6]  W. James Shuttleworth,et al.  Post-deforestation Amazonian climate: Anglo-Brazilian research to improve prediction , 1991 .

[7]  H. Rocha,et al.  Surface conductance of Amazonian pasture: model application and calibration for canopy climate , 1995 .

[8]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3 , 1993 .

[9]  Keith Beven,et al.  Linking parameters across scales: Subgrid parameterizations and scale dependent hydrological models. , 1995 .

[10]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[11]  Keith Beven,et al.  Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[12]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Application of multiscale water and energy balance models on a tallgrass prairie , 1994 .

[13]  William James Shuttleworth,et al.  Dry Season Micrometeorology of Central Amazonian Ranchland , 1992 .

[14]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[15]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[16]  K. Beven,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Uncertainty in Runoff Prediction and the Value of Data: An Application of the GLUE Approach , 1996 .

[17]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Stomatal control by both [ABA] in the xylem sap and leaf water status: a test of a model for draughted or ABA‐fed field‐grown maize , 1993 .

[18]  Paul G. Jarvis,et al.  Description and validation of an array model - MAESTRO. , 1990 .

[19]  Peter S. Eagleson,et al.  Climate, soil, and vegetation: 3. A simplified model of soil moisture movement in the liquid phase , 1978 .

[20]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[21]  A. Dalcher,et al.  A Simple Biosphere Model (SIB) for Use within General Circulation Models , 1986 .

[22]  R. Spear.  Eutrophication in peel inlet—II. Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis , 1980 .