Novel characterization of landscape-level variability in historical vegetation structure.

We analyzed historical timber inventory data collected systematically across a large mixed-conifer-dominated landscape to gain insight into the interaction between disturbances and vegetation structure and composition prior to 20th century land management practices. Using records from over 20 000 trees, we quantified historical vegetation structure and composition for nine distinct vegetation groups. Our findings highlight some key aspects of forest structure under an intact disturbance regime: (1) forests were low density, with mean live basal area and tree density ranging from 8-30 m2 /ha and 25-79 trees/ha, respectively; (2) understory and overstory structure and composition varied considerably across the landscape; and (3) elevational gradients largely explained variability in forest structure over the landscape. Furthermore, the presence of large trees across most of the surveyed area suggests that extensive stand-replacing disturbances were rare in these forests. The vegetation structure and composition characteristics we quantified, along with evidence of largely elevational control on these characteristics, can provide guidance for restoration efforts in similar forests.

[1]  S. B. Show,et al.  Cover Type and Fire Control in the National Forests of Northern California , 2017 .

[2]  J. Franklin,et al.  Historical conditions in mixed-conifer forests on the eastern slopes of the northern Oregon Cascade Range, USA , 2014 .

[3]  W. Baker.  Historical forest structure and fire in Sierran mixed-conifer forests reconstructed from General Land Office survey data , 2014 .

[4]  S. Dobrowski,et al.  Twentieth century shifts in abundance and composition of vegetation types of the Sierra Nevada, CA, US , 2014 .

[5]  Brandon M. Collins,et al.  Fire weather and large fire potential in the northern Sierra Nevada , 2014 .

[6]  M. Moritz,et al.  Examining Historical and Current Mixed-Severity Fire Regimes in Ponderosa Pine and Mixed-Conifer Forests of Western North America , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Joshua H. Viers,et al.  Modern departures in fire severity and area vary by forest type, Sierra Nevada and southern Cascades, California, USA , 2013 .

[8]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Managing Forests and Fire in Changing Climates , 2013, Science.

[9]  J. Franklin,et al.  Historical structure and composition of ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests in south-central Oregon , 2013 .

[10]  B. Collins,et al.  Early forest dynamics in stand-replacing fire patches in the northern Sierra Nevada, California, USA , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  P. Hessburg,et al.  Restoring forest resilience: From reference spatial patterns to silvicultural prescriptions and monitoring , 2013 .

[12]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  A Restoration Framework for Federal Forests in the Pacific Northwest , 2012 .

[13]  M. North,et al.  Topographic Variation in Structure of Mixed-Conifer Forests Under an Active-Fire Regime , 2012, Ecosystems.

[14]  J. Wiens,et al.  Historical ecology, climate change, and resource management: can the past still inform the future? , 2012 .

[15]  Tongli Wang,et al.  ClimateWNA—High-Resolution Spatial Climate Data for Western North America , 2012 .

[16]  S. Stephens,et al.  Impacts of fire exclusion and recent managed fire on forest structure in old growth Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests , 2011 .

[17]  A. Taylor,et al.  Fire regimes, forest change, and self-organization in an old-growth mixed-conifer forest, Yosemite National Park, USA. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[18]  Peter Z. Fulé,et al.  Does It Make Sense to Restore Wildland Fire in Changing Climate? , 2008 .

[19]  A. Symstad,et al.  Fire and forest history at Mount Rushmore. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[20]  J. Bouldin.  Some problems and solutions in density estimation from bearing tree data: a review and synthesis , 2008 .

[21]  K. Hornik,et al.  Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework , 2006 .

[22]  K. Hornik,et al.  A Lego System for Conditional Inference , 2006 .

[23]  P. Hessburg,et al.  Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: Contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras , 2005 .

[24]  A. Taylor,et al.  SPATIAL PATTERNS AND CONTROLS ON HISTORICAL FIRE REGIMES AND FOREST STRUCTURE IN THE KLAMATH MOUNTAINS , 2003 .

[25]  D. Mladenoff,et al.  Testing methods to produce landscape-scale presettlement vegetation maps from the U.S. public land survey records , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[26]  Julio L. Betancourt,et al.  APPLIED HISTORICAL ECOLOGY: USING THE PAST TO MANAGE FOR THE FUTURE , 1999 .

[27]  N. Stephenson,et al.  Actual evapotranspiration and deficit: biologically meaningful correlates of vegetation distribution across spatial scales , 1998 .

[28]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 1997 .

[29]  M. M. Moore,et al.  DETERMINING REFERENCE CONDITIONS FOR ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT OF SOUTHWESTERN PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS , 1997 .

[30]  A. J. Parker,et al.  THE TOPOGRAPHIC RELATIVE MOISTURE INDEX: AN APPROACH TO SOIL-MOISTURE ASSESSMENT IN MOUNTAIN TERRAIN , 1982 .

[31]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  The National Elevation Dataset , 2002 .

[32]  S. Stephens.  Mixed conifer and red fir forest structure and uses in 1899 from the central and northern Sierra Nevada, California. , 2000 .

[33]  C. Ottow.  Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Site , 2000 .