Mixed Modes of Innovation: An Empiric Approach to Capturing Firms' Innovation Behaviour

This study uses exploratory data analysis techniques to develop typologies of innovation modes or strategies for groups of firms. Analysing micro-level survey data from 18 countries we identify five innovation modes. The coherence and relevance of the innovation modes is tested by using them as explanatory factors in equations explaining economic performance. In most countries one or more innovation modes are positively associated with labour productivity. However, there is no consistent cross-country pattern as to which modes show significant associations with productivity. Even if common innovation patterns have been identified, there is no ‘single’ mode or form of innovation across countries that underlies the overall impact of innovation and there appear to be major national differences in patterns of competitive and comparative advantage with respect to levels of productivity as well as growth in turnover and employment. Importantly, sectoral innovation orientations are embedded in national systems, as well as exhibiting a degree of convergence at sectoral level.

[1]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[2]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[3]  C. Freeman.  The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[4]  S. Mazzocchi.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative For Creating and Profiting From Technology , 2004 .

[5]  Marion Frenz,et al.  Exploring non-technological and mixed modes of innovation across countries , 2009 .

[6]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  How Europe's economies learn: a comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15 , 2007 .

[7]  C. Freeman.  Technology policy and economic performance : lessons from Japan , 1987 .

[8]  B. Lundvall,et al.  Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation , 2007 .

[9]  Orietta Marsili,et al.  The fruit flies of innovations: A taxonomy of innovative small firms , 2006 .

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[11]  Heinz Hollenstein,et al.  Innovation modes in the Swiss service sector: a cluster analysis based on firm-level data , 2003 .

[12]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[13]  V. Acha.  OPEN BY DESIGN: THE ROLE OF DESIGN IN OPEN INNOVATION. , 2008 .

[14]  A. Leiponen,et al.  What exactly are technological regimes?: Intra-industry heterogeneity in the organization of innovation activities , 2007 .

[15]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[16]  John Cantwell,et al.  Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[17]  M. Frenz,et al.  The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey , 2009 .

[18]  A taxonomy of innovation: How do public sector agencies innovate? Results of the 2010 European Innobarometer survey of public agencies , 2011 .

[19]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[20]  R. Rothwell.  Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s , 1992 .

[21]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[23]  B. Verspagen,et al.  The voyage of the beagle in innovation systems land : explorations on sectors, innovation, heterogeneity and selection , 2008 .

[24]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  EXIS: an exploratory approach to innovation scoreboards , 2005 .

[25]  Von Tunzelmann,et al.  Technology and Industrial Progress: The Foundations of Economic Growth , 1995 .

[26]  Giuliana Battisti,et al.  How Innovative are UK Firms? Evidence from the Fourth UK Community Innovation Survey on Synergies between Technological and Organizational Innovations , 2010 .