Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.

BACKGROUND the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly remains controversial. Options include nonoperative treatment, open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF), and hemiarthroplasty. Locking plate technology has expanded the indications for ORIF for certain fracture types in osteoporotic bone. This study was performed to characterize the incidence, treatment, and revision surgery of proximal humeral fractures according to geographic region both before (1999 to 2000) and after (2004 to 2005) the introduction of locking plates. METHODS we used a 20% sample of Medicare Part-B data and the Medicare denominator file for the years 1998 to 2006. Proximal humeral fractures were identified by Common Procedural Terminology codes for treatment, categorized as nonoperative, ORIF, or hemiarthroplasty. Geographic variation in treatment type was determined with use of 306 hospital referral regions. Odds ratios for revision surgery were calculated by the need for repeat surgery within one year of the index procedure. Rates were adjusted for age, sex, race, and comorbidities. RESULTS there were 14,774 proximal humeral fractures in the 20% sample from 1999 to 2000 (an estimated total of 73,870 fractures) and 16,138 fractures in the sample from 2004 to 2005 (an estimated total of 80,690 fractures). The overall age, sex, and race-adjusted incidence of proximal humeral fractures was unchanged from 1999 to 2005 (2.47 vs. 2.48 per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries; p = 0.992). However, the absolute rate of surgically managed proximal humeral fractures rose 3.2 percentage points from 12.5% to 15.7%, a relative increase of 25.6% (p < 0.0001). The relative increase in the percentage of fractures treated with ORIF was 28.5% (p < 0.0001), while the percentage of fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty increased 19.6% (p < 0.0001). There were large regional variations in the proportion treated surgically (range, 0% to 68.18%). The rates of repeat surgery were significantly higher in 2004 to 2005 compared with 1999 to 2000 (odds ratio = 1.47, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS although the incidence of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly did not change from 1999 to 2005, the rate of surgical treatment increased significantly. The marked regional variation in the rates of surgical treatment highlights the need for better consensus regarding optimal treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Additional research is needed to help to determine which fractures are best treated operatively in order to maximize outcome and minimize the need for revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE therapeutic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[1]  A. Tosteson,et al.  Distal radial fracture treatment: what you get may depend on your age and address. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  J. Lurie,et al.  What Rate of Utilization is Appropriate in Musculoskeletal Care? , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  Peter Helwig,et al.  Analysis of Efficacy and Failure in Proximal Humerus Fractures Treated With Locking Plates , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[4]  H. Bischoff-Ferrari,et al.  Effect of seasonality and weather on fracture risk in individuals 65 years and older , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[5]  James N Weinstein,et al.  United States’ Trends and Regional Variations in Lumbar Spine Surgery: 1992–2003 , 2006, Spine.

[6]  J. Weinstein,et al.  The Geographic Incidence and Treatment Variation of Common Fractures of Elderly Patients , 2006, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[7]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Ankle Fractures in the Elderly: What You Get Depends on Where You Live and Who You See , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[8]  R. Cofield,et al.  Understanding proximal humerus fractures: image analysis, classification, and treatment. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[9]  F. Herrmann,et al.  Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care , 2005, Aging clinical and experimental research.

[10]  K. Strømsøe,et al.  Fractures in the proximal humerus: functional outcome and evaluation of 70 patients treated in hospital , 2005, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[11]  Young W. Kwon,et al.  Outcome after treatment of proximal humeral fractures with humeral head replacement. , 2005, Instructional course lectures.

[12]  J. Kelsey,et al.  Risk factors for proximal humerus fracture. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  O. Löfman,et al.  Health-related quality of life after osteoporotic fractures , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  T. Mclaurin Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are we operating on too many? , 2004, Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.)).

[15]  N. Südkamp,et al.  Fracture treatment in the elderly. , 2004, Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca.

[16]  Mark A Mighell,et al.  Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. , 2003, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[17]  J. Skinner,et al.  Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities in rates of knee arthroplasty among Medicare patients. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  C. Court-Brown,et al.  Impacted valgus fractures (B1.1) of the proximal humerus. The results of non-operative treatment. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  C. Court-Brown,et al.  The translated two-part fracture of the proximal humerus. Epidemiology and outcome in the older patient. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  C. Sledge The Dartmouth Atlas of Musculoskeletal Health Care , 2001 .

[21]  N Maffulli,et al.  Complex proximal humeral fractures in adults--a systematic review of management. , 2001, Injury.

[22]  P. Cortés,et al.  Surgical treatment of three-part proximal humeral fractures. , 2001 .

[23]  J. Gibson,et al.  Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. , 2001, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[24]  P. Kannus,et al.  Osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly Finnish persons: Sharp increase in 1970-1998 and alarming projections for the new millennium , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[25]  M. Karagas,et al.  Fracture risk in the U.S. Medicare population. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  H. A. Karladani Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  K. Zyto Non-operative treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. , 1998, Injury.

[28]  Russell S. Kirby,et al.  The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care , 1998 .

[29]  M. Karagas,et al.  Patterns of fracture among the United States elderly: geographic and fluoride effects. , 1996, Annals of epidemiology.

[30]  J. Zuckerman,et al.  Functional outcome after humeral head replacement for acute three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures. , 1995, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[31]  E. Fisher,et al.  Hospital readmission rates for cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  L I Iezzoni,et al.  Identifying Complications of Care Using Administrative Data , 1994, Medical care.

[33]  B. Kristiansen,et al.  Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. , 1987, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[34]  G. Horne,et al.  Fractures of the proximal humerus in adults. , 1985, The Journal of trauma.

[35]  R. Leyshon Closed treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus. , 1984, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[36]  R H Cofield,et al.  Prosthetic arthroplasty for fractures and fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[37]  B. Nilsson,et al.  Epidemiology of fracture of the upper end of the humerus. , 1975, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[38]  C. Neer,et al.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.