Re-scheduling the unit commitment problem in fuzzy environment

The conventional prediction of future power demands are always made based on the historical data. However, the real power demands are affected by many other factors as weather, temperature and unexpected emergencies. The use of historical information alone cannot well predict real future demands. In this study, the experts' opinions from related fields are taken into consideration. To deal the uncertainty of historical data and imprecise experts' opinions, we employ fuzzy variables to better characterize the forecasted future power loads. The conventional unit commitment problem (UCP) is updated here by considering the spinning reserve costs in a fuzzy environment. As the solution, we proposed a heuristic algorithm called local convergence averse binary particle swarm optimization (LCA-PSO) to solve the UCP. The proposed model and algorithm are used to analyze several test systems. The comparisons between the proposed algorithm and the conventional approaches show that the LCA-PSO performs better in finding the optimal solutions.

[1]  Zdeněk Zmeškal Value at risk methodology of international index portfolio under soft conditions (fuzzy-stochastic approach) , 2005 .

[2]  Ragab A. El-Sehiemy,et al.  An emergency power system control based on the multi-stage fuzzy based procedure , 2007 .

[3]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[4]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation.

[5]  Yian-Kui Liu,et al.  Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models , 2002, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[6]  Jun Hasegawa,et al.  A hybrid LR-EP for solving new profit-based UC problem under competitive environment , 2002 .

[7]  P. Sauer,et al.  Uncertainty Management in the Unit Commitment Problem , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Yanbin Yuan,et al.  An improved binary particle swarm optimization for unit commitment problem , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  H. H. Balci,et al.  Scheduling electric power generators using particle swarm optimization combined with the Lagrangian relaxation method , 2004 .

[10]  R. D. Christie,et al.  Prioritizing emergency control problems with fuzzy set theory , 1997 .

[11]  Sangwook Lee,et al.  Binary Particle Swarm Optimization with Bit Change Mutation , 2007, IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci..

[12]  R. Jabr Robust self-scheduling under price uncertainty using conditional value-at-risk , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Eiichi Tanaka,et al.  An Evolutionary Programming Solution to the Unit Commitment Problem , 1997 .

[14]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Value-at-Risk-Based Two-Stage Fuzzy Facility Location Problems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[15]  Shuming Wang,et al.  On the Continuity and Absolute Continuity of Credibility Functions , 2007 .

[16]  P. Attaviriyanupap,et al.  A Hybrid LR-EP for Solving New Profit-Based UC Problem under Competitive Environment , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[17]  Junzo Watada,et al.  Fuzzy Power System Reliability Model Based on Value-at-Risk , 2010, KES.

[18]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  A fuzzy-based optimal reactive power control , 1993 .

[19]  Junzo Watada,et al.  Two-stage fuzzy stochastic programming with Value-at-Risk criteria , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[20]  D. Duffie,et al.  An Overview of Value at Risk , 1997 .

[21]  Xiaohui Yuan,et al.  An improved PSO for dynamic load dispatch of generators with valve-point effects , 2009 .