User recommendations for intelligent personal assistants

Adoption of intelligent personal assistants (IPA) is on the rise. Published studies on IPAs often focus on the analysis and critique of existing IPA features without understanding specific user needs that the technology aims to address. We present an exploratory study that gathered user recommendations for the design of their ideal IPA. The study relied on focus group and content analysis methods for data collection and analysis. Major themes in participants’ recommendations for IPA design were identified and included feature improvements (e.g. speech recognition, input/output modalities, device feedback); customizability and increased control over IPA features and functions; transparency and understanding of IPA hardware, software, and data management processes; personification; compatibility with third-party platforms; accessibility; and aesthetics. Many of these recommendations are rooted in basic user experience design principles and have been previously discussed in the context of PDAs (personal digital assistants) and other technology. Addressing these recommendations would advance IPA technology and improve user experiences with it.

[1]  Katharina Reinecke,et al.  A Large Inclusive Study of Human Listening Rates , 2018, CHI.

[2]  Tihomir Orehovački,et al.  Modelling the Perceived Pragmatic and Hedonic Quality of Intelligent Personal Assistants , 2018, IHSI.

[3]  Irene Lopatovska,et al.  Personification of the Amazon Alexa: BFF or a Mindless Companion , 2018, CHIIR.

[4]  Qi Li,et al.  Talk to me: Exploring user interactions with the Amazon Alexa , 2019, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Ingrid Sörensen.  Expectations on Chatbots among Novice Users during the Onboarding Process , 2017 .

[6]  Boon Low,et al.  Student attitudes towards mobile library services for smartphones , 2011, Libr. Hi Tech.

[7]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Analyzing and Predicting Task Reminders , 2016, UMAP.

[8]  Nikhil Sharma,et al.  Designing Speech, Acoustic and Multimodal Interactions , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Martin Porcheron.  Conversational agent use in a café , 2017 .

[10]  Leah Findlater,et al.  "Accessibility Came by Accident": Use of Voice-Controlled Intelligent Personal Assistants by People with Disabilities , 2018, CHI.

[11]  Irene Lopatovska,et al.  User interactions with “Alexa” in public academic space , 2018, ASIST.

[12]  Sven Wachsmuth,et al.  How Can I Help? , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[13]  Hui Li,et al.  Progress and Prospects for Spoken Language Technology: What Ordinary People Think , 2016, INTERSPEECH.

[14]  Helen F. Hastie,et al.  Trust triggers for multimodal command and control interfaces , 2017, ICMI.

[15]  Shruti Sannon,et al.  "Alexa is my new BFF": Social Roles, User Satisfaction, and Personification of the Amazon Echo , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  Heetae Yang,et al.  Understanding adoption of intelligent personal assistants: A parasocial relationship perspective , 2018, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[17]  J. D. Vet,et al.  A personal digital assistant as an advanced remote control for audio / video equipment , 1999 .

[18]  Ernest Freeberg,et al.  The Age of Edison: Electric Light and the Invention of Modern America , 2013 .

[19]  Merinda McLure,et al.  Perspectives on E-books from Instructors and Students in the Social Sciences , 2012 .

[20]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  "Do Animals Have Accents?": Talking with Agents in Multi-Party Conversation , 2017, CSCW.

[21]  Tihomir Orehovacki,et al.  Author's Personal Copy the Journal of Systems and Software Evaluating the Perceived and Estimated Quality in Use of Web 2.0 Applications Author's Personal Copy Author's Personal Copy Author's Personal Copy , 2022 .

[22]  Benjamin R. Cowan,et al.  "What can i help you with?": infrequent users' experiences of intelligent personal assistants , 2017, MobileHCI.

[23]  Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues,et al.  Intelligent Personal Assistants Based on Internet of Things Approaches , 2018, IEEE Systems Journal.

[24]  M. Thüring,et al.  Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction , 2007 .

[25]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life , 2018, CHI.

[26]  Alex X. Liu,et al.  The Insecurity of Home Digital Voice Assistants - Amazon Alexa as a Case Study , 2017, ArXiv.

[27]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[28]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Moderating Focus Groups , 1997 .

[29]  M. Traynor.  Focus group research. , 2015, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[30]  Imed Zitouni,et al.  Understanding User Satisfaction with Intelligent Assistants , 2016, CHIIR.

[31]  C. Johnson.  Progress and Prospects , 1991 .

[32]  Bobby J. Calder,et al.  Taking an expanded view of customers' needs: Qualitative research for aiding innovation , 2000 .

[33]  J. Stanton,et al.  The importance of aesthetics on customers’ intentions to purchase smartphones , 2017 .

[34]  Angeliki Metallinou,et al.  Topic-based Evaluation for Conversational Bots , 2018, ArXiv.

[35]  Mehmet Emin Mutlu,et al.  On the track of Artificial Intelligence: Learning with Intelligent Personal Assistants , 2016 .

[36]  Gilbert Dizon,et al.  Using Intelligent Personal Assistants for Second Language Learning: A Case Study of Alexa , 2017 .

[37]  Joseph A. Salem,et al.  Library on the Go: A Focus Group Study of the Mobile Web and the Academic Library , 2011, Coll. Res. Libr..

[38]  Kim-Phuong L. Vu,et al.  Privacy Concerns for Use of Voice Activated Personal Assistant in the Public Space , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[39]  Martin Halvey,et al.  Evaluating the Social Acceptability of Voice Based Smartwatch Search , 2016, AIRS.

[40]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  "Like Having a Really Bad PA": The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents , 2016, CHI.