Bicycle boulevards and changes in physical activity and active transportation: findings from a natural experiment.

OBJECTIVE This study evaluates changes in physical activity and active transportation associated with installation of new bicycle boulevards. METHODS This natural experiment study uses data from a longitudinal panel of adults with children (n=353) in Portland, OR. Activity and active transportation outcomes were measured with GPS and accelerometers worn for up to 5 days in 2010-11 and 2012-13. The effect of the treatment was estimated using difference in differences estimation and multivariate regression models. RESULTS In five of the seven models, the interaction term was not significant, indicating that after controlling for the main effects of time and exposure separately, there was no correlation between being in a treatment area and minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day, bicycling >10 min, walking >20 min, minutes of walking (if >20), or making a bike trip. Significant covariates included rain, being female, living closer to downtown, and attitudes towards bicycling, walking, and car safety. CONCLUSION This study could not confirm an increase in physical activity or active transportation among adults with children living near newly installed bicycle boulevards. Additional pre/post studies are encouraged, as well as research on the length of time after installation that behavior change is likely to occur.

[1]  Lawrence D Frank,et al.  Environmental and demographic correlates of bicycling. , 2013, Preventive medicine.

[2]  Susan L Handy,et al.  The Influences of the Built Environment and Residential Self-Selection on Pedestrian Behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX , 2005 .

[3]  A. Herring,et al.  Evaluating change in physical activity with the building of a multi-use trail. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  J. Pucher,et al.  Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: new evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes , 2012 .

[5]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Self-Selection in the Relationship between the Built Environment and Walking: Empirical Evidence from Northern California , 2006 .

[6]  N. Mutrie,et al.  Interventions to promote walking: systematic review , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  S. Titze,et al.  Environmental, social, and personal correlates of cycling for transportation in a student population. , 2007, Journal of physical activity & health.

[8]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Factors that Influence University Employees to Commute by Bicycle , 2012 .

[9]  David B. Klenosky,et al.  Trails and physical activity: a review. , 2011, Journal of physical activity & health.

[10]  G. Rose,et al.  Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[11]  Ma Xiang-lu,et al.  Commuting by Bicycle:An Overview of the Literature , 2011 .

[12]  Janette Sadik-Khan,et al.  Urban Bikeway Design Guide , 2014 .

[13]  M. Kreuter,et al.  A community-based approach to promoting walking in rural areas. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  Orion Stewart,et al.  Findings from Research on Active Transportation to School and Implications for Safe Routes to School Programs , 2011 .

[15]  D. Ogilvie,et al.  Interventions to promote cycling: systematic review , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Kevin J. Krizek,et al.  Explaining Changes in Walking and Bicycling Behavior: Challenges for Transportation Research , 2009 .

[17]  A. Young Mostly Harmless Econometrics , 2012 .

[18]  D. Merom,et al.  An environmental intervention to promote walking and cycling--the impact of a newly constructed Rail Trail in Western Sydney. , 2003, Preventive medicine.

[19]  Lynn Weigand,et al.  Initiative for Bicycle and Pedestrian Innovation , 2008 .

[20]  Nathan McNeil,et al.  Travel mode imputation using GPS and accelerometer data from a multi-day travel survey , 2019, Journal of Transport Geography.

[21]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Factors Correlated with Bicycle Commuting: A Study in Six Small U.S. Cities , 2011 .

[22]  David Fletcher,et al.  Modelling skewed data with many zeros: A simple approach combining ordinary and logistic regression , 2005, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[23]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data , 2012 .

[24]  Jan Garrard,et al.  Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: a cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[25]  Nathan McNeil,et al.  Four Types of Cyclists? , 2013 .

[26]  Roger Mackett,et al.  Commuting and health in Cambridge: a study of a 'natural experiment' in the provision of new transport infrastructure , 2010, BMC public health.

[27]  Kees Maat,et al.  The effect of work-related factors on the bicycle commute mode choice in the Netherlands , 2013 .

[28]  A. Cheadle,et al.  Cycling and the Built Environment, a US Perspective , 2005 .

[29]  J. Pucher,et al.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[30]  K. Teschke,et al.  Route Preferences among Adults in the near Market for Bicycling: Findings of the Cycling in Cities Study , 2010, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[31]  Daniel Fuller,et al.  Impact evaluation of a public bicycle share program on cycling: a case example of BIXI in Montreal, Quebec. , 2013, American journal of public health.

[32]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  The relationship between the built environment and nonwork travel: A case study of Northern California , 2009 .

[33]  S. Titze,et al.  Association of built-environment, social-environment and personal factors with bicycling as a mode of transportation among Austrian city dwellers. , 2008, Preventive medicine.