How to use a systems diagram to analyse and structure complex problems for policy issue papers

Many policy problems are complex in the sense that natural, technological, social and human elements interact. Problem exploration and structuring are essential as a basis for deliberate and focused approaches towards problem resolution. The results of problem exploration efforts can be laid down in the form of a policy issue paper. We have developed a systemic, stepwise approach, which has been elaborated and taught for over a decade to hundreds of students. This seven-step approach centers on the construction of a system diagram as a means to provide structure to the conceptualisation of a complex problem situation. The approach is based on a conscious combination of existing relatively straightforward analytical methods including objectives hierarchy, means-ends analysis, causal diagramming, stakeholder analysis, and contextual scenarios. The obtained insights are then summed up in a policy issue paper, which is the basis for further planning and research.

[1]  I. Mayer,et al.  Perspectives on Policy Analysis: A Framework for Understanding and Design , 2004 .

[2]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  Bruce L. Golden,et al.  Analysis for Public Decisions (2nd ed.). , 1983 .

[4]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Structuring Objectives for Problems of Public Interest , 1988, Oper. Res..

[5]  David A. Tansik,et al.  Analysis for Public Decisions , 1976 .

[6]  Tte van der Lei,et al.  The System Diagram as a Diagnostic Aid for Quantitative Methode Choice , 2006 .

[7]  Wil A. H. Thissen.  Issue formulation in a multi-actor context: a five-step approach , 2000, Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. 'cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions' (cat. no.0.

[8]  Bert Enserink,et al.  Building scenarios for the University , 2000 .

[9]  Jeremy Harrison,et al.  Micro Combined Heat & Power (CHP) for housing , 2004 .

[10]  Bert Enserink,et al.  A quick scan for infrastructure planning: screening alternatives through interactive stakeholder analysis , 2000 .

[11]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Modeling and Simulation in Systems Engineering , 2001, Simul..

[12]  Mark D. Uncles,et al.  Handbook of Systems Analysis: Overview of Uses, Procedures, Applications and Practice , 1986 .

[13]  H. De Bruijn,et al.  Process Management: Why Project Management Fails in Complex Decision Making Processes , 2005 .

[14]  R. S. Stainton,et al.  Handbook of systems analysis: H.J. MISER and E.S. QUADE (eds.) Wiley, 1985, xviii + 346 pages, £34.95 , 1986 .

[15]  詳子 斎藤,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking の拡張とその応用 , 2003 .

[16]  Tony Hindle,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World , 1990 .

[17]  Anne L. Schneider,et al.  Policy analysis by design , 1987 .

[18]  J. Sterman.  Business Dynamics , 2000 .

[19]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[20]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited , 2001 .

[21]  Bert Enserink,et al.  Thinking the unthinkable – the end of the Dutch river dike system? Exploring a new safety concept for the river management , 2004 .

[22]  William N. Dunn,et al.  Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction , 1993 .

[23]  Wil A. H. Thissen.  Systems engineering education for public policy , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[24]  A. Hoogerwerf.  Het ontwerpen van beleid. Een handleiding voor de praktijk en resultaten van onderzoek , 1992 .

[25]  J. Bryson.  What to do when Stakeholders matter , 2004 .

[26]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Business dynamics : systems thinking and modelling for acomplex world , 2002 .

[27]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[28]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Learning For Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and its use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students , 2007 .

[29]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Problem structuring methods: new directions in a problematic world , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[30]  Peter Schwartz,et al.  The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World , 1996 .

[31]  Shashi Shekhar,et al.  Cognitive Mapping , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[32]  C. Eden,et al.  Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management , 1998 .

[33]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Where next for problem structuring methods , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[34]  H. Simon,et al.  On the Definition of the Causal Relation , 1952 .

[35]  R. Jewett,et al.  Systems Engineering , 1959, IRE Transactions on Military Electronics.

[36]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  The Education of a Technology Policy Analyst—to Process Management , 2004, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[37]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Uncertainty: the challenge for policy analysis in the 21st century , 2000 .

[38]  C. D. Beaumont.  Pitfalls of Analysis , 1981 .

[39]  Peter Schwartz.  Composing a plot for your scenario , 1992 .

[40]  P. B. Checkland,et al.  Formulating Problems for Systems Analysis , 1980 .

[41]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Selecting Attributes to Measure the Achievement of Objectives , 2005, Oper. Res..

[42]  Colin Eden,et al.  Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[44]  A. Gardiner,et al.  The art of problem solving , 2008 .

[45]  D. A. Conway,et al.  The Art of Problem Solving , 1978 .

[46]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Forecasting and Management of Technology , 1991 .

[47]  J. Bryson,et al.  Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping for Practical Business Results , 2004 .

[48]  J. D. Ryan.  Handbook of Systems Analysis — Craft Issues and Procedural Choices , 1988 .