Recognition of paediatric otopathology by General Practitioners.

OBJECTIVE General Practitioners (GPs) are required to diagnose a number of common ear pathologies on a regular basis. In particular, otitis media with effusion (OME) can be well managed in primary care if a reliable diagnosis can be made. We set out to assess the confidence and ability of GPs to diagnose otopathology, as well as the access that they had to tympanometry and pneumatic otoscopy to assist in making their diagnoses. METHODS Twenty GPs were shown a series of forty slides, half with OME and half with normal tympanic membranes; they were then asked to state whether each image represented an ear with OME or not. The same GPs were then shown 20 slides, half of which were ears with a common pathology and half were normal; the participants were asked to state whether the slide was of a normal ear or make a diagnosis of the pathology. Access to equipment and previous training were assessed via a short questionnaire. RESULTS The median score for the correct diagnosis of OME was 53% (range 30-67.5%), only slightly higher than chance. The participants correctly identified that an ear was abnormal for a mean of 80% of the time (range 65-95%), but were only able to make a correct diagnosis of the pathology for a mean of 41% of the ears (range 20-80%). No participant had access to pneumatic otoscopy or tympanometry in their practices. CONCLUSIONS GPs have difficulty in correctly diagnosing OME from otoscopy alone, but are able to determine the presence of other otopathology. They were less able to diagnose specific abnormalities.

[1]  M. Haggard,et al.  Improving referrals for glue ear from primary care: are multiple interventions better than one alone? , 2001, Journal of health services research & policy.

[2]  G. B. Cook,et al.  The Rinne test for conductive deafness. A critical reappraisal. , 1988, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[3]  Maroeska M Rovers,et al.  Grommets (ventilation tubes) for hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion in children. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  A. Pfleiderer,et al.  Assessment of the otoscopic skills of general practitioners and medical students: is there room for improvement? , 1992, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[5]  R. A. Melker,et al.  Evaluation of the diagnostic value of pneumatic otoscopy in primary care using the results of tympanometry as a reference standard. , 1993, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[6]  J. Ludemann,et al.  Accuracy of the Weber and Rinne tuning fork tests in evaluation of children with otitis media with effusion. , 2007, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[7]  M. Haggard,et al.  Do GPs have the techniques for 'watchful waiting' in glue ear? , 1998, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  M. Pichichero Diagnostic accuracy, tympanocentesis training performance, and antibiotic selection by pediatric residents in management of otitis media. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[9]  F. V. van Balen,et al.  Tympanometry by general practitioners: reliable? , 1999, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[10]  A. Šimundić,et al.  [Diagnostic accuracy]. , 2006, Acta medica Croatica : casopis Hravatske akademije medicinskih znanosti.

[11]  M. Pichichero,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Otitis Media and Tympanocentesis Skills Assessment Among Pediatricians , 2003, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[12]  J. Lous,et al.  Criteria, performance and diagnostic problems in diagnosing acute otitis media. , 1999, Family practice.