Protofold: A Successive Kinetostatic Compliance Method for Protein Conformation Prediction

This paper presents an efficient and novel computational protein prediction methodology called kineto-static compliance method. Successive kineto-static fold compliance is a methodology for predicting a protein molecule's motion under the effect of an interatomic force field without the need for molecular-dynamic simulation. Instead, the chain complies under the kineto-static effect of the force field in such a manner that each rotatable joint changes by an amount proportional to the effective torque on that joint. This process successively iterates until all of the joint torques have converged to a minimum. This configuration is equivalent to a stable, globally optimized potential energy state of the system or, in other words, the final conformation of the protein. This methodology is implemented in a computer software package named PROTOFOLD. In this paper, we have used PROTOFOLD to predict the final conformation of a small peptide chain segment, an alpha helix, and the Triponin protein chains from a denatured configuration. The results show that torques in each joint are minimized to values very close to zero, which demonstrates the method's effectiveness for protein conformation prediction.

[1]  C. Anfinsen.  Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. , 1973, Science.

[2]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Energy parameters in polypeptides. VII. Geometric parameters, partial atomic charges, nonbonded interactions, hydrogen bond interactions, and intrinsic torsional potentials for the naturally occurring amino acids , 1975 .

[3]  Norman L. Allinger,et al.  Conformational analysis. 130. MM2. A hydrocarbon force field utilizing V1 and V2 torsional terms , 1977 .

[4]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Energy parameters in polypeptides. 9. Updating of geometrical parameters, nonbonded interactions, and hydrogen bond interactions for the naturally occurring amino acids , 1983 .

[5]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[6]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Theoretical studies of medium effects on conformational equilibria , 1983 .

[7]  U. Singh,et al.  A NEW FORCE FIELD FOR MOLECULAR MECHANICAL SIMULATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINS , 1984 .

[8]  R. Cramer,et al.  Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field , 1989 .

[9]  Jenn-Huei Lii,et al.  The MM3 force field for amides, polypeptides and proteins , 1991 .

[10]  Arnold T. Hagler,et al.  On the use of quantum energy surfaces in the derivation of molecular force fields , 1994 .

[11]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[12]  Thomas A. Halgren,et al.  Merck molecular force field. IV. conformational energies and geometries for MMFF94 , 1996 .

[13]  Thomas A. Halgren,et al.  Merck molecular force field. III. Molecular geometries and vibrational frequencies for MMFF94 , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[14]  T. Halgren.  Merck molecular force field. II. MMFF94 van der Waals and electrostatic parameters for intermolecular interactions , 1996 .

[15]  Jenn-Huei Lii,et al.  An improved force field (MM4) for saturated hydrocarbons , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  K. Gundertofte,et al.  A comparison of conformational energies calculated by several molecular mechanics methods , 1996 .

[17]  T. Halgren.  Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94 , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  A. Rappé,et al.  Molecular Mechanics Across Chemistry , 1997 .

[20]  John L. Klepeis,et al.  DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematicsand Theoretical Computer Science Global Optimization Approaches in Protein Folding andPeptide , 2007 .

[21]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Combined Molecular Dynamics and Φ-Value Analysis of Structure−Reactivity Relationships in the Transition State and Unfolding Pathway of Barnase: Structural Basis of Hammond and Anti-Hammond Effects , 1998 .

[22]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  GROMOS Force Field , 2002 .

[23]  Martin J. Field,et al.  A Practical Introduction to the Simulation of Molecular Systems: Subject index , 2007 .