Cyber Aggression: The Relation between Online Offenders and Offline Social Competence

Children are increasingly using computer technologies to engage in acts of aggression against peers, often termed 'cyber aggression'. Media reports have sensationalized instances of cyber aggression, and social scientists have begun to examine its characteristics and consequences. Using a younger sample of children than most previous research (192 third‐ through sixth‐grade children), the present research evaluated grade and gender effects on cyber aggression and, most importantly, evaluated the classroom peer social consequences of engaging in cyber aggression, after controlling for traditional, face‐to‐face aggression. Children reported engaging in cyber aggression at comparable rates across grades and between males and females. Engaging in cyber aggression was related to higher rates of loneliness and lower rates of global self‐worth, peer optimism, number of mutual friendships, social acceptability, and popularity. In short, after controlling for effects attributable to traditional aggression, cyber aggression was related to significant negative peer relations outcomes.

[1]  Peter Renshaw,et al.  Loneliness in children. , 1984 .

[2]  Ann S. Masten,et al.  A revised class play method of peer assessment. , 1985 .

[3]  K. Dodge,et al.  Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  R. Loeber Development and risk factors of juvenile antisocial behavior and delinquency. , 1990 .

[5]  J. Coie,et al.  Preadolescent peer status, aggression, and school adjustment as predictors of externalizing problems in adolescence. , 1990, Child development.

[6]  M. Boivin,et al.  A Reassessment of the Self-Perception Profile for Children: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Convergent Validity of a French Version among Second through Sixth Grade Children , 1992 .

[7]  K. Dodge,et al.  A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. , 1994 .

[8]  N. Crick,et al.  Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. , 1995, Child development.

[9]  M F Huque,et al.  Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  F. Verhulst,et al.  Accelerated longitudinal comparisons of aggressive versus delinquent syndromes , 1997, Development and Psychopathology.

[11]  M. Mosher,et al.  Relational and overt aggression in preschool. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[12]  Andrea Hopmeyer,et al.  Sociometric Popularity and Peer-Perceived Popularity , 1998 .

[13]  D. Espelage,et al.  Bullying and Victimization : What Have We Learned and Where Do We Go from Here ? [ Mini-Series ] , 2017 .

[14]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Youth engaging in online harassment: associations with caregiver-child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. , 2004, Journal of adolescence.

[15]  T. Li Cyber-Harassment: A Study of a New Method for an Old Behavior , 2005 .

[16]  R. Cohen,et al.  Expecting the best: The relation between peer optimism and social competence , 2006 .

[17]  Qing Li Cyberbullying in Schools , 2006 .

[18]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Online Communication and Adolescent Well-Being: Testing the Stimulation Versus the Displacement Hypothesis , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  J. Wolak,et al.  Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[20]  K. Williams,et al.  Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[21]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: implications for school intervention. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[22]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Prevalence and frequency of Internet harassment instigation: implications for adolescent health. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[23]  Juliana Raskauskas,et al.  Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[24]  Brian W. Sturm,et al.  Cyberbullying: From Playground to Computer , 2007 .

[25]  Tolga Aricak,et al.  Cyberbullying among Turkish Adolescents , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[26]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization , 2008 .

[27]  Akira Sakamoto,et al.  The effect of cyber-friends on loneliness and social anxiety: Differences between high and low self-evaluated physical attractiveness groups , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  M. Jackson,et al.  Sticks and Stones Can Break My Bones, But How Can Pixels Hurt Me? , 2009 .