Campaigns and conflict on social media: a literature snapshot

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the themes identified in the submissions to this volume. The findings are contextualized in recent scholarship on these themes. Design/methodology/approach The discussion is organized around predicting social media use among candidates, organizations, and citizens, then exploring differences in the content of social media postings among candidates, organizations, and citizens, and finally exploring the impact of social media use on mobilization and participatory inequality defined by gender, age, and socio-economic status. Findings This volume addresses whether social media use is more common among liberal or conservative citizens, candidates, and organizations; the level of negativity in social media discourse and the impact on attitudes; the existence of echo chambers of like-minded individuals and groups; the extent and nature of interactivity in social media; and whether social media will reinforce participation inequalities. In sum, the studies suggest that negativity and interactivity on social media are limited and mixed support for echo chambers. While social media mobilizes citizens, these citizens are those who already pre-disposed to engage in civic and political life. Originality/value This paper explores key topics in social media research drawing upon 60 recently published studies. Most of the studies are published in 2015 and 2016, providing a contemporary analysis of these topics.

[1]  A. Larsson Going viral? Comparing parties on social media during the 2014 Swedish election , 2017 .

[2]  Porismita Borah,et al.  Political Facebook use: Campaign strategies used in 2008 and 2012 presidential elections , 2016 .

[3]  Maayan Zhitomirsky-Geffet,et al.  Utilizing Facebook pages of the political parties to automatically predict the political orientation of Facebook users , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..

[4]  Michael Franz,et al.  Coherent campaigns? Campaign broadcast and social messaging , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..

[5]  Jacob R. Straus,et al.  Communicating in 140 Characters or Less: Congressional Adoption of Twitter in the 111th Congress , 2013, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[6]  Kajsa E. Dalrymple,et al.  Politics in 140 Characters or Less: Campaign Communication, Network Interaction, and Political Participation on Twitter , 2016 .

[7]  Pablo Barberá,et al.  Less is more? How demographic sample weights can improve public opinion estimates based on Twitter data. , 2016 .

[8]  Caroline Lego Muñoz,et al.  Baby Boom or Bust? the New Media Effect on Political Participation , 2018 .

[9]  Sanne Kruikemeier,et al.  How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  S. Valenzuela,et al.  The Social Media Basis of Youth Protest Behavior: The Case of Chile , 2012 .

[11]  Sebastián Valenzuela,et al.  Social media in Latin America: deepening or bridging gaps in protest participation? , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..

[12]  Roman Gerodimos,et al.  Obama’s 2012 Facebook Campaign: Political Communication in the Age of the Like Button , 2015 .

[13]  A. Ceron,et al.  Flames and Debates: Do Social Media Affect Satisfaction with Democracy? , 2016 .

[14]  Heather K. Evans,et al.  “You Tweet Like a Girl!” , 2016 .

[15]  Emily K. Vraga,et al.  In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media , 2015 .

[16]  Jacob R. Straus,et al.  Social Networking and Constituent Communications: Members’ Use of Twitter and Facebook During a Two-Month Period in the 112th Congress , 2013 .

[17]  Andreas Jungherr Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review , 2016 .

[18]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  Social Media as a Public Space for Politics: Cross-National Comparison of News Consumption and Participatory Behaviors in the United States and the United Kingdom , 2015 .

[19]  Melissa Merry,et al.  Making friends and enemies on social media: the case of gun policy organizations , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..

[20]  Sanne Kruikemeier,et al.  Unraveling the effects of active and passive forms of political Internet use: Does it affect citizens’ political involvement? , 2014, New Media Soc..

[21]  Chris Wells,et al.  Combining Big Data and Survey Techniques to Model Effects of Political Content Flows in Facebook , 2017 .

[22]  Dhiraj Murthy,et al.  Urban Social Media Demographics: An Exploration of Twitter Use in Major American Cities , 2016, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  D. Murthy,et al.  Do We Tweet Differently From Our Mobile Devices? A Study of Language Differences on Mobile and Web‐Based Twitter Platforms , 2015 .

[24]  C. Sunstein Republic.com , 2001 .

[25]  Jacob Ørmen,et al.  The use of Twitter in the Danish EP elections 2014 , 2015 .

[26]  Heather K. Evans Do women only talk about "female issues"? Gender and issue discussion on Twitter , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..

[27]  R. Gibson,et al.  Online Campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political Actors and Citizens in the Aftermath of the Web.2.0 Evolution , 2014 .

[28]  S. Valenzuela,et al.  Student and Environmental Protests in Chile: The Role of Social Media , 2015 .

[29]  Shelley Boulianne Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research , 2015 .

[30]  Jae Kook Lee,et al.  Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites , 2017, New Media Soc..

[31]  A. Chadwick,et al.  Dual Screening the Political: Media Events, Social Media, and Citizen Engagement , 2015 .

[32]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  The Power of Television Images in a Social Media Age , 2015 .

[33]  Shannon C. McGregor,et al.  Personalization, gender, and social media: gubernatorial candidates’ social media strategies , 2017 .

[34]  Jason Gainous,et al.  I Am Woman, Hear Me Tweet! Gender Differences in Twitter Use among Congressional Candidates , 2017 .

[35]  Jacob R. Straus,et al.  Congressional social media communications: evaluating Senate Twitter usage , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..

[36]  Gunn Enli,et al.  Social Media Incumbent Advantage: Barack Obama's and Mitt Romney's Tweets in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign , 2016 .

[37]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  Facebook is no źGreat equalizerź , 2017 .

[38]  Stephen Green,et al.  Rockin' robins: Do congresswomen rule the roost in the Twittersphere? , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[39]  Michael Link,et al.  Facebook User Research Using a Probability-Based Sample and Behavioral Data , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  Natalie Fenton Social Media Is , 2015 .

[41]  S. Valenzuela Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior , 2013 .

[42]  Emily K. Vraga Party differences in political content on social media , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..

[43]  Leticia Bode,et al.  Campaign Klout: Measuring Online Influence During the 2012 Election , 2015 .

[44]  Heather E. Hodges,et al.  A pipeline of tweets: environmental movements’ use of Twitter in response to the Keystone XL pipeline , 2016 .

[45]  Sanne Kruikemeier,et al.  The relationship between online campaigning and political involvement , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..

[46]  S. Valenzuela,et al.  Social Networks that Matter: Exploring the Role of Political Discussion for Online Political Participation , 2012 .

[47]  Todd Graham,et al.  New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns , 2016, New Media Soc..

[48]  Kevin Wagner,et al.  Internet freedom and social media effects: democracy and citizen attitudes in Latin America , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..

[49]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  A New Space for Political Behavior: Political Social Networking and its Democratic Consequences , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[50]  Karolina Koc-Michalska,et al.  Social Media in the UK Election Campaigns 2008–2014 , 2015 .

[51]  Lindsey Meeks,et al.  Gendered styles, gendered differences: Candidates’ use of personalization and interactivity on Twitter , 2016 .

[52]  Nikos Tzavidis,et al.  In the streets with a degree: How political generations, educational attainment and student status affect engagement in protest politics , 2014 .

[53]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Politics as Usual? Campaign Broadcast and Social Messaging , 2016 .

[54]  W. Lowe,et al.  Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements , 2015 .

[55]  Rens Vliegenthart,et al.  Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication , 2013 .