Steady-state Signatures of Visual Perceptual Load, Multimodal Distractor Filtering, and Neural Competition

The perceptual load theory of attention posits that attentional selection occurs early in processing when a task is perceptually demanding but occurs late in processing otherwise. We used a frequency-tagged steady-state evoked potential paradigm to investigate the modality specificity of perceptual load-induced distractor filtering and the nature of neural-competitive interactions between task and distractor stimuli. EEG data were recorded while participants monitored a stream of stimuli occurring in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) for the appearance of previously assigned targets. Perceptual load was manipulated by assigning targets that were identifiable by color alone (low load) or by the conjunction of color and orientation (high load). The RSVP task was performed alone and in the presence of task-irrelevant visual and auditory distractors. The RSVP stimuli, visual distractors, and auditory distractors were “tagged” by modulating each at a unique frequency (2.5, 8.5, and 40.0 Hz, respectively), which allowed each to be analyzed separately in the frequency domain. We report three important findings regarding the neural mechanisms of perceptual load. First, we replicated previous findings of within-modality distractor filtering and demonstrated a reduction in visual distractor signals with high perceptual load. Second, auditory steady-state distractor signals were unaffected by manipulations of visual perceptual load, consistent with the idea that perceptual load-induced distractor filtering is modality specific. Third, analysis of task-related signals revealed that visual distractors competed with task stimuli for representation and that increased perceptual load appeared to resolve this competition in favor of the task stimulus.

[1]  D. Regan Steady-state evoked potentials. , 1977, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain , 2009, Vision Research.

[3]  E. Miller,et al.  Suppression of visual responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex of the awake macaque by addition of a second stimulus , 1993, Brain Research.

[4]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  C D Frith,et al.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. , 1997, Science.

[6]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Combined use of microreflexes and event-related brain potentials as measures of auditory selective attention. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  A crossmodal crossover: Opposite effects of visual and auditory perceptual load on steady-state evoked potentials to irrelevant visual stimuli , 2012, NeuroImage.

[8]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Attentional modulation of the visual motion aftereffect has a central cognitive locus: evidence of interference by the postcategorical on the precategorical. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Effects of intermodal attention on the auditory steady-state response and the event-related potential. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[10]  R. Dolan,et al.  Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  T. Picton,et al.  The effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[13]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[16]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Attentional bias of competitive interactions in neuronal networks of early visual processing in the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[17]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[18]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[19]  D. Regan Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[20]  S. Kastner,et al.  Stimulus context modulates competition in human extrastriate cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight , 2003, Nature.

[24]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans , 1993, Nature.

[26]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[27]  M. Scherg,et al.  Intracerebral Sources of Human Auditory Steady-State Responses , 2004, Brain Topography.

[28]  G R Mangun,et al.  Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  J. Duncan Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. , 1996 .

[30]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady‐state visual evoked potential , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[31]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Push-pull mechanism of selective attention in human extrastriate cortex. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  G. Sperling,et al.  Attentional modulation of SSVEP power depends on the network tagged by the flicker frequency. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  C. Frith,et al.  Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory attention task , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  G. Mangun,et al.  Perceptual Load and Visuocortical Processing: Event-Related Potentials Reveal Sensory-Level Selection , 2001, Psychological science.

[37]  P. Sauseng,et al.  Neural correlates of visuo-spatial working memory encoding—An EEG study , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[38]  Paul M Corballis,et al.  Visual perceptual load modulates an auditory microreflex. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[39]  R. Desimone Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[40]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[41]  J. Duncan EPS Mid-Career Award 2004: Brain mechanisms of attention , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  Ana Torralbo,et al.  Perceptual-Load-Induced Selection as a Result of Local Competitive Interactions in Visual Cortex , 2008, Psychological science.

[43]  N. Lavie,et al.  On the Efficiency of Visual Selective Attention: Efficient Visual Search Leads to Inefficient Distractor Rejection , 1997 .

[44]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Modulation of sensory suppression: implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  M. Tovée,et al.  The responses of single neurons in the temporal visual cortical areas of the macaque when more than one stimulus is present in the receptive field , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  Carol L Colby,et al.  Auditory and visual attention modulate motion processing in area MT+. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[48]  S. Kastner,et al.  Stimulus similarity modulates competitive interactions in human visual cortex. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[49]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  On the effiency of attentional selection: Efficient visual search results in inefficient rejection of distraction , 1997 .

[50]  J Driver,et al.  A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. , 2001, British journal of psychology.