REMOTE SENSING OF RIPARIAN BUFFERS: PAST PROGRESS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS 1

Riparian buffer zone management is an area of increasing relevance as human modification of the landscape continues unabated. Land and water resource managers are continually challenged to maintain stream ecosystem integrity and water quality in the context of rapidly changing land use, which often offsets management gains. Approaches are needed not only to map vegetation cover in riparian zones, but also to monitor the changes taking place, target restoration activities, and assess the success of previous management actions. To date, these objectives have been difficult to meet using traditional techniques based on aerial photos and field visits, particularly over large areas. Recent advances in remote sensing have the potential to substantially aid buffer zone management. Very high resolution imagery is now available that allows detailed mapping and monitoring of buffer zone vegetation and provides a basis for consistent assessments using moderately high resolution remote sensing (e.g., Landsat). Laser-based remote sensing is another advance that permits even more detailed information on buffer zone properties, such as refined topographic derivatives and multidimensional vegetation structure. These sources of image data and map information are reviewed in this paper, examples of their application to riparian buffer mapping and stream health assessment are provided, and future prospects for improved buffer monitoring are discussed.

[1]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: A multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic Region , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  J. W. Gilliam,et al.  Riparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment , 1987 .

[3]  Limin Yang,et al.  An approach for mapping large-area impervious surfaces: synergistic use of Landsat-7 ETM+ and high spatial resolution imagery , 2003 .

[4]  J. David Allan,et al.  Assessing Biotic Integrity of Streams: Effects of Scale in Measuring the Influence of Land Use/Cover and Habitat Structure on Fish and Macroinvertebrates , 1999, Environmental management.

[5]  Vincent J. Realmuto,et al.  The advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflectance radiometer (Aster) , 1991, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[6]  Scott Goetz,et al.  Urbanization and the Loss of Resource Lands in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed , 2005, Environmental management.

[7]  R. Nelson,et al.  A Multiple Resource Inventory of Delaware Using Airborne Laser Data , 2003 .

[8]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar , 2002 .

[9]  John A. Young,et al.  Influences of upland and riparian land use patterns on stream biotic integrity , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  Zachary H. Bowen,et al.  EVALUATION OF LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) FOR MEASURING RIVER CORRIDOR TOPOGRAPHY 1 , 2002 .

[11]  Thomas P. Simon,et al.  Influence of habitat, water quality, and land use on macro-invertebrate and fish assemblages of a southeastern coastal plain watershed, USA , 2004 .

[12]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Review ArticleDigital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review , 2004 .

[13]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  STREAM HEALTH RANKINGS PREDICTED BY SATELLITE DERIVED LAND COVER METRICS 1 , 2005 .

[14]  J. Blair,et al.  The Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor: a medium-altitude, digitisation-only, airborne laser altimeter for mapping vegetation and topography , 1999 .

[15]  John Van Sickle,et al.  PROJECTING THE BIOLOGICAL CONDITION OF STREAMS UNDER ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS OF HUMAN LAND USE , 2004 .

[16]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Development of A circa 2000 Landcover DatabaseFor The United States , 2002 .

[17]  M. Hodgson,et al.  An evaluation of LIDAR- and IFSAR-derived digital elevation models in leaf-on conditions with USGS Level 1 and Level 2 DEMs , 2003 .

[18]  J. Bryan Blair,et al.  Beyond potential vegetation: Combining lidar data and a height-structured model for carbon studies , 2004 .

[19]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  SPATIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR LINKING WATERSHED LAND COVER TO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS IN STREAMS , 2005 .

[20]  Ralph Dubayah,et al.  Validation of Vegetation Canopy Lidar sub-canopy topography measurements for a dense tropical forest , 2002 .

[21]  Diane L. Szafoni,et al.  A Riparian Wildlife Habitat Evaluation Scheme Developed Using GIS , 2001, Environmental management.

[22]  V. Klemas.  Remote Sensing of Landscape-Level Coastal Environmental Indicators , 2001, Environmental management.

[23]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[24]  S. Goetz,et al.  IKONOS imagery for resource management: Tree cover, impervious surfaces, and riparian buffer analyses in the mid-Atlantic region , 2003 .

[25]  David D. Bosch,et al.  REMM: The Riparian Ecosystem Management Model , 2000 .

[26]  D. Strebel,et al.  Using Environmental Stressor Information to Predict the Ecological Status of Maryland Non-tidal Streams as Measured by Biological Indicators , 2003, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[27]  C. Tucker,et al.  NASA’s Global Orthorectified Landsat Data Set , 2004 .

[28]  J. Newbold,et al.  Water Quality Functions of Riparian Forest Buffers in Chesapeake Bay Watersheds , 1997, Environmental management.

[29]  J. Townshend,et al.  A stepwise regression tree for nonlinear approximation: Applications to estimating subpixel land cover , 2003 .

[30]  J. Townshend,et al.  Towards an operational MODIS continuous field of percent tree cover algorithm: examples using AVHRR and MODIS data , 2002 .

[31]  Frank W. Gerlach,et al.  IKONOS satellite, imagery, and products , 2003 .

[32]  M. Lefsky,et al.  Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: methods and validation for closed-canopy, broadleaf forests , 2001 .

[33]  P. D. Lattin,et al.  INFLUENCE OF REMOTE SENSING IMAGERY SOURCE ON QUANTIFICATION OF RIPARIAN LAND COVER/LAND USE 1 , 2004 .

[34]  T. Weber,et al.  Landscape Ecological Assessment of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed , 2004, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[35]  Limin Yang,et al.  COMPLETION OF THE 1990S NATIONAL LAND COVER DATA SET FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES FROM LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND ANCILLARY DATA SOURCES , 2001 .

[36]  D J Harper,et al.  No Net Loss of Fish Habitat: A Review and Analysis of Habitat Compensation in Canada , 2005, Environmental management.

[37]  W. Cohen,et al.  Landsat's Role in Ecological Applications of Remote Sensing , 2004 .