Impact of the dynamic line rating analysis in regions with high levels of wind and solar PV generation

Power system operators traditionally use a static transmission line rating method to ensure the electric grid operates under a pre-defined limit temperature of the conductors. This method normally assesses the maximal power capacity of each line using conservative constant weather conditions that usually underestimate the real transmission capacity of overhead power lines. Dynamic line rating (DLR) analysis represent a safe and cost-efficient way to deal with existing congested networks and allowing further integration of current/future renewable generation in many regions.This work applies a DLR tool to identify the power lines’ additional theoretical capacity obtained by using this methodology for two Portuguese regions with distinct conditions regarding i) weather, ii) topography and iii) wind and solar power resource. The capacity values obtained are presented, and a comparison with the traditional values obtained from the static methodology used by the Portuguese system operator is established. Results show that the dynamic approach enables significant gains in the line rating for both regions and its use can be extended to regions with high solar resource since the induced cooling effect is also observed in those regions.

[1]  Yi Wang,et al.  Study on the impacts of meteorological factors on distributed photovoltaic accommodation considering dynamic line parameters , 2020 .

[2]  A. Estanqueiro,et al.  Towards a high-resolution offshore wind Atlas - The Portuguese Case , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[3]  Andrea Michiorri,et al.  Optimal Dynamic Line Rating Forecasts Selection Based on Ampacity Probabilistic Forecasting and Network Operators’ Risk Aversion , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Ana Estanqueiro,et al.  DLR use for optimization of network design withvery large wind (and VRE) penetration , 2018 .

[5]  Petr Musilek,et al.  Dynamic thermal rating of transmission lines: A review , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[6]  Jake P. Gentle,et al.  Coupling computational fluid dynamics with the high resolution rapid refresh model for forecasting dynamic line ratings , 2019, Electric Power Systems Research.

[7]  Andrea Michiorri,et al.  Forecasting for dynamic line rating , 2015 .

[8]  Sven Hoffmann,et al.  GUIDE FOR THERMAL RATING CALCULATIONS OF OVERHEAD LINES , 2014 .

[9]  I. Albizu,et al.  Review of dynamic line rating systems for wind power integration , 2016 .

[10]  J. Duque,et al.  Optimal management of power networks using a dynamic line rating approach , 2018 .

[11]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Understanding the Benefits of Dynamic Line Rating Under Multiple Sources of Uncertainty , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Jake P. Gentle,et al.  Improvement of Transmission Line Ampacity Utilization by Weather-Based Dynamic Line Rating , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[13]  A. Abboud,et al.  Using Computational Fluid Dynamics of Wind Simulations Coupled With Weather Data to Calculate Dynamic Line Ratings , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[14]  Mario Manana,et al.  Dynamic management in overhead lines: A successful case of reducing restrictions in renewable energy sources integration , 2019, Electric Power Systems Research.

[15]  Roberto Lacal Arántegui,et al.  Photovoltaics and wind status in the European Union after the Paris Agreement , 2018 .

[16]  Mario Manana,et al.  Comparison between IEEE and CIGRE Thermal Behaviour Standards and Measured Temperature on a 132-kV Overhead Power Line , 2015 .