Non-contrast computed tomography in the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis

Abstract Background The aim of the study was to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) in the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). Methods. Screening our neurological department database, we identified 53 patients who were admitted to neurological emergency department with clinical signs of CVST. Two independent observers assessed the NCCT scans for the presence of CVST. CT venography and/or MR venography were used as a reference standard. Interobserver agreement between the two readers was assessed using Kappa statistic. Attenuation inside the cerebral venous sinuses was measured and compared between the patient and the control group. Results CVST was confirmed in 13 patients. Sensitivity and specificity of NCCT for overall presence of CVST were 100% and 83%, respectively, with Kappa value of 0.72 (a good agreement between observers). The attenuation values between CVST patients and control group were significantly different (73.4 ± 14.12 HU vs. 58.1 ± 7.58 HU; p = 0.000). The ROC analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.916 (95% CI, 0.827 – 1.00) and an optimal cutoff value of 64 HU, leading to a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 87%. Conclusions NCCT as a first-line investigation has a high value for diagnosis of CVST in the emergency setting. The additional measurement of the sinus attenuation may improve the diagnostic value of the examination.

[1]  T. Saifee,et al.  Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. , 2017, British journal of hospital medicine.

[2]  F. De Keyzer,et al.  CT Density Measurement and H:H Ratio Are Useful in Diagnosing Acute Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[3]  L. Jacks,et al.  Acute Abdominal Venous Thromboses—The Hyperdense CT Sign , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  N. Campeau,et al.  Cerebral Venous Sinus Density on Noncontrast CT Correlates with Hematocrit , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  Gustavo Saposnik,et al.  Diagnosis and Management of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association , 2011, Stroke.

[6]  M. Wiesmann,et al.  Noncontrast CT in Deep Cerebral Venous Thrombosis and Sinus Thrombosis: Comparison of its Diagnostic Value for Both Entities , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[7]  M. Bousser,et al.  Isolated Lateral Sinus Thrombosis: A Series of 62 Patients , 2009, Stroke.

[8]  Kiran B. Patankar,et al.  Diagnostic role of 64-slice multidetector row CT scan and CT venogram in cases of cerebral venous thrombosis , 2008, Emergency Radiology.

[9]  J. Bogousslavsky,et al.  Risk factors of cerebral vein and sinus thrombosis. , 2008, Frontiers of neurology and neuroscience.

[10]  A. Triquenot-Bagan,et al.  [Cerebral venous thrombosis]. , 2013, La Revue du praticien.

[11]  J. Ferro,et al.  Cerebral venous thrombosis: an update , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[12]  B. Jones,et al.  Imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis: current techniques, spectrum of findings, and diagnostic pitfalls. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[13]  C. Soria,et al.  A Negative D-Dimer Assay Does Not Rule Out Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Series of Seventy-Three Patients , 2005, Stroke.

[14]  A. Viera,et al.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.

[15]  P. Finelli,et al.  Thrombosis of the cerebral veins and sinuses. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Do Normal D-dimer Levels Reliably Exclude Cerebral Sinus Thrombosis? , 2004, Stroke.

[17]  E. Parati,et al.  Hyperhomocysteinemia and other thrombophilic risk factors in 26 patients with cerebral venous thrombosis , 2004, European Journal of Neurology.

[18]  J. Ferro,et al.  Prognosis of Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis: Results of the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT) , 2004, Stroke.

[19]  J. Healy,et al.  Polycythemia mimicking venous sinus thrombosis. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  E. Teasdale Cerebral venous thrombosis: Making the most of imaging , 2000, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[21]  D. Takhtani,et al.  Neuroradiology case of the day. Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis and infarcts. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[22]  A. Kaim,et al.  Cerebral veins: comparative study of CT venography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[23]  R. Alberico,et al.  Cerebral venography: comparison of CT and MR projection venography. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  F. Woimant,et al.  MRI and MRA for diagnosis and follow-up of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). , 1997, Clinical radiology.

[25]  D. Dormont,et al.  MRI in cerebral venous thrombosis. , 1994, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[26]  S. Hunter,et al.  The empty delta sign: frequency and significance in 76 cases of dural sinus thrombosis. , 1987, Radiology.