Influence of plasma diagnostics and constraints on the quality of equilibrium reconstructions on Joint European Torus.

One of the main approaches to thermonuclear fusion relies on confining high temperature plasmas with properly shaped magnetic fields. The determination of the magnetic topology is, therefore, essential for controlling the experiments and for achieving the required performance. In Tokamaks, the reconstruction of the fields is typically formulated as a free boundary equilibrium problem, described by the Grad-Shafranov equation in toroidal geometry and axisymmetric configurations. Unfortunately, this results in mathematically very ill posed problems and, therefore, the quality of the equilibrium reconstructions depends sensitively on the measurements used as inputs and on the imposed constraints. In this paper, it is shown how the different diagnostics (Magnetics Measurements, Polarimetry and Motional Stark Effect), together with the edge current density and plasma pressure constraints, can have a significant impact on the quality of the equilibrium on JET. Results show that both the Polarimetry and Motional Stark Effect internal diagnostics are crucial in order to obtain reasonable safety factor profiles. The impact of the edge current density constraint is significant when the plasma is in the H-mode of confinement. In this plasma scenario the strike point positions and the plasma last closed flux surface can change even by centimetres, depending on the edge constraints, with a significant impact on the remapping of the equilibrium-dependent diagnostics and of pedestal physics studies. On the other hand and quite counter intuitively, the pressure constraint can severely affect the quality of the magnetic reconstructions in the core. These trends have been verified with several JET discharges and consistent results have been found. An interpretation of these results, as interplay between degrees of freedom and available measurements, is provided. The systematic analysis described in the paper emphasizes the importance of having sufficient diagnostic inputs and of properly validating the results of the codes with independent measurements.

[1]  B. Alper,et al.  Monitoring Alfvén cascades with interferometry on the JET Tokamak. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[2]  J. Contributors,et al.  Neoclassical tearing mode (NTM) magnetic spectrum and magnetic coupling in JET tokamak , 2010 .

[3]  R Akers,et al.  Optical boundary reconstruction of tokamak plasmas for feedback control of plasma position and shape. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[4]  J. Lingertat,et al.  Local expansion method for fast plasma boundary identification in JET , 1993 .

[5]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Residual analysis of the equilibrium reconstruction quality on JET , 2011 .

[6]  T. Gerbaud,et al.  Electron cyclotron emission measurements on JET: Michelson interferometer, new absolute calibration, and determination of electron temperature. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[7]  D. P. Kostomarov,et al.  Analyses of substantially different plasma current densities and safety factors reconstructed from magnetic diagnostics data , 2011 .

[8]  L. Lao,et al.  MHD Equilibrium Reconstruction in the DIII-D Tokamak , 2005 .

[9]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Equilibrium analysis of current profiles in tokamaks , 1990 .

[10]  Emmanuele Peluso,et al.  Preliminary investigation of the use of visible images to validate the magnetic reconstruction of the boundary on JET , 2013 .

[11]  J. Contributors,et al.  Accuracy of EFIT equilibrium reconstruction with internal diagnostic information at JET. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[12]  Validation of Joint European Torus polarimetric measurements with residual analysis , 2010 .

[13]  A. Murari,et al.  A new calibration code for the JET polarimeter. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.