The use of health information technology in seven nations

OBJECTIVE To assess the state of health information technology (HIT) adoption and use in seven industrialized nations. DESIGN We used a combination of literature review, as well as interviews with experts in individual nations, to determine use of key information technologies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We examined rates of electronic health record (EHR) use in ambulatory care and hospital settings, along with current activities in health information exchange (HIE) in seven countries: the United States (U.S.), Canada, United Kingdom (UK), Germany, Netherlands, Australia, and New Zealand (NZ). RESULTS Four nations (the UK, Netherlands, Australia, and NZ) had nearly universal use of EHRs among general practitioners (each >90%) and Germany was far along (40-80%). The U.S. and Canada had a minority of ambulatory care physicians who used EHRs consistently (10-30%). While there are no high quality data for the hospital setting from any of the nations we examined, evidence suggests that only a small fraction of hospitals (<10%) in any single country had the key components of an EHR. HIE efforts were a high priority in all seven nations but the early efforts have had varying degrees of active clinical data exchange. CONCLUSION We examined HIT adoption in seven industrialized nations and found that many have achieved high levels of ambulatory EHR adoption but lagged with respect to inpatient EHR and HIE. These data suggest that increased efforts will be needed if interoperable EHRs are soon to become ubiquitous in these seven nations.

[1]  D. Gans,et al.  Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems. , 2005, Health affairs.

[2]  Chun-Ju Hsiao,et al.  Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2007. , 2010, National health statistics reports.

[3]  Paul N. Gorman,et al.  Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: results of a 2002 survey. , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[4]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  E. McGlynn,et al.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Knut Bernstein,et al.  Development, implementation and diffusion of EHR systems in Denmark , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  A. Mccarthy Development , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  James G. Anderson,et al.  Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[9]  Robin C. Meili,et al.  Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. , 2005, Health affairs.

[10]  Sara Rosenbaum,et al.  How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence. , 2006, Health affairs.

[11]  P. Basch Quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. , 2003, New England Journal of Medicine.

[12]  M. Rosenthal,et al.  Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. , 2005, JAMA.

[13]  Eric C. Pan,et al.  The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. , 2005, Health affairs.

[14]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Communities' Readiness for Health Information Exchange: The National Landscape in 2004 , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Health Information Technology in the United States: The Information Base for Progress , 2006 .

[16]  A. Jha,et al.  Care in U.S. hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Jill R Horwitz,et al.  U.S. adoption of computerized physician order entry systems. , 2005, Health affairs.

[19]  S. Schoenbaum,et al.  Information technologies: when will they make it into physicians' black bags? , 2004, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[20]  Anne F. Kittler,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[21]  Ilias Iakovidis,et al.  Towards personal health record: current situation, obstacles and trends in implementation of electronic healthcare record in Europe , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[22]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  Andrew P. McAfee,et al.  The state of regional health information organizations: current activities and financing. , 2007, Health affairs.

[24]  C. Schoen,et al.  On the front lines of care: primary care doctors' office systems, experiences, and views in seven countries. , 2006, Health affairs.

[25]  D. McInnes,et al.  General practitioners’ use of computers for prescribing and electronic health records: results from a national survey , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.

[26]  Alan Macfarlane,et al.  Social , 1994, Schizophrenia Research.

[27]  Richard E. Scott,et al.  Access and authorisation in a Glocal e-Health Policy context , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[28]  Rebecca Didham,et al.  Information Technology systems in general practice medicine in New Zealand. , 2004, The New Zealand medical journal.

[29]  Tim Benson,et al.  Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not—Part 1: incentives , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  Tim Benson,et al.  Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not—Part 2: scalability , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  Hiroyuki Yoshihara Development of the electronic health record in Japan , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[32]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.