Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences
暂无分享,去创建一个
Nirusha Lachman | Wojciech Pawlina | Justin E. Juskewitch | W. Pawlina | Cara J Alexander | W. M. Crescini | N. Lachman | Cara J. Alexander | Weronika M. Crescini | Cara Alexander | W. Crescini | J. Juskewitch
[1] Cande V Ananth,et al. The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: an application to resident education. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[2] James Boyle. Eight Years of Asking Questions , 2006 .
[3] J. Mestre,et al. ASK-IT/A2L: Assessing student knowlede with instructional technology , 2005, physics/0508144.
[4] Dejano T Sobral,et al. Cross‐year peer tutoring experience in a medical school: conditions and outcomes for student tutors , 2002, Medical education.
[5] T Eric Schackow,et al. Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents. , 2004, Family medicine.
[6] J. Erinjeri,et al. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters. , 2008, Academic radiology.
[7] Matthew J Bassignani,et al. Effect of an audience response system on resident learning and retention of lecture material. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[8] W. Pawlina,et al. Can a flexible medical curriculum promote student learning and satisfaction? , 2007, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.
[9] Lorraine J. Robertson. Twelve tips for using a computerised interactive audience response system , 2000 .
[10] J. Collins,et al. Audience response systems: technology to engage learners. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[11] Robin Kay,et al. A strategic assessment of audience response systems used in higher education , 2009 .
[12] F. Rybicki,et al. A novel standard-compliant audience response system for medical education. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[13] S. Carmichael,et al. Assessing professionalism in early medical education: experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course. , 2005, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.
[14] Jeremy Roschelle,et al. Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[15] Jared Keengwe,et al. Faculty Integration of Technology into Instruction and Students’ Perceptions of Computer Technology to Improve Student Learning , 2007 .
[16] Maryfran Barber,et al. Clicker evolution: seeking intelligent design. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.
[17] Robert J. Dufresne,et al. QUESTION DRIVEN INSTRUCTION: TEACHING SCIENCE (WELL) WITH AN AUDIENCE RESPONSE SYSTEM , 2005 .
[18] William Perrotti,et al. From college to clinic: Reasoning over memorization is key for understanding anatomy , 2002, The Anatomical record.
[19] Jane E Caldwell,et al. Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.
[20] Eric Mazur,et al. Farewell, Lecture? , 2009, Science.
[21] W. Pawlina,et al. Putting the needs of the patient first: Mayo Clinic's core value, institutional culture, and professionalism covenant. , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[22] M. Oliver,et al. Electronic Voting Systems for Lectures then and Now: A Comparison of Research and Practice , 2007 .
[23] Kalyani Premkumar,et al. Rules of engagement–12 tips for successful use of “clickers” in the classroom , 2008, Medical teacher.
[24] Jeffrey T Johnson,et al. Creating learner-centered classrooms: use of an audience response system in pediatric dentistry education. , 2005, Journal of dental education.