Study of pneumatic servo system based on linear active disturbance rejection controller

To improve the robustness and the anti-disturbance of control system, regulate its stiffness, a scheme concluding linear active disturbance rejection controllers for pneumatic servo system is proposed. Two linear active disturbance rejection controllers are designed respectively to track the motion and pressure reference. The design of a linear active disturbance rejection controller is independent of precisely mathematical model of the system. The extended state observer can track successfully the states and extended state of the system, and it is possible to realize the states feedback and handle the model uncertainty and compensate external disturbance. The simulation results show that pneumatic servo system based on linear active disturbance rejection controllers is robust against modeling uncertainty and external disturbances. The dynamic performance of the system using linear active disturbance rejection controllers also can be improved as well.

[1]  Hongyan Wang,et al.  Study of a pneumatic constant force tracking system , 2011, Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Electronic & Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology.

[2]  Zhiqiang Gao,et al.  A comparison study of advanced state observer design techniques , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003..

[3]  Xiangrong Shen,et al.  Independent Stiffness and Force Control of Pneumatic Actuators for Contact Stability during Robot Manipulation , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Yildirim Hurmuzlu,et al.  A High Performance Pneumatic Force Actuator System: Part I—Nonlinear Mathematical Model , 2000 .

[5]  Maria Letizia Corradini,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology , 2004 .

[6]  Ren Xuemei Recent developments in sliding mode control and active disturbance rejection control , 2013 .

[7]  Zhiqiang Gao,et al.  Theory vs. practice: the challenges from industry , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[8]  Gary M. Bone,et al.  Nonlinear Modeling and Control of Servo Pneumatic Actuators , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[9]  Gary M. Bone,et al.  High steady-state accuracy pneumatic servo positioning system with PVA/PV control and friction compensation , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[10]  Somyot Kaitwanidvilai,et al.  Position control of a pneumatic servo system by genetic algorithm based fixed-structure robust H/sub /spl infin// loop shaping control , 2004, 30th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2004. IECON 2004.

[11]  Shu Ning,et al.  Experimental comparison of two pneumatic servo position control algorithms , 2005, IEEE International Conference Mechatronics and Automation, 2005.

[12]  Yildirim Hurmuzlu,et al.  A High Performance Pneumatic Force Actuator System: Part II—Nonlinear Controller Design , 2000 .

[13]  Zhiqiang Gao,et al.  Motion Control Design Optimization : Problem and Solutions , 2006 .

[14]  Zhiqiang Gao,et al.  Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003..

[15]  Sun Li Tuning of Auto-disturbance-rejection Controller for a Class of Nonlinear Plants , 2004 .