In the Agent we trust!: The role of personality and cognition in human trust in Virtual Agents

Trust is an important factor in any relationship and within teamwork is no exception. Teammates need to trust each other to achieve common tasks effectively and efficiently. Teamwork that combines both a human and an Intelligent Virtual Agent (IVA) has drawn much interest; nevertheless, the handling of trust between humans and IVAs is unclear. In this paper, we seek to understand how people trust an IVA teammate. The current study considers two facets of trust: personality and cognition. Our experimental study with 55 participants, involving a collaborative human-IVA task, sought to determine whether human trust in an IVA teammate is affected by the IVA’s personality and whether that differs when the IVA's personality matches the human's personality. Furthermore, we sought to understand the relative importance of personality-based versus cognitive-based facets (e.g. the information offered by the IVA) on human trust in the IVA and the resultant effect of human trust on team performance. Results indicated that cognitive-based facets played a more dominant role in establishing trust than personality-based facets. Additionally, the results showed that human trust in the IVA had a significantly positive influence on human-IVA team performance.

[1]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[2]  D. H. Mills.  The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .

[3]  A. Tellegen,et al.  An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  First Impressions: Users' Judgments of Virtual Agents' Personality and Interpersonal Attitude in First Encounters , 2012, IVA.

[5]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance Over Time , 2007, MIS Q..

[6]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: managerial behavior control's impact on team effectiveness , 2000, ICIS.

[7]  Ning Wang,et al.  Agreeable People Like Agreeable Virtual Humans , 2008, IVA.

[8]  P. Harms,et al.  Team identification, trust and conflict: a mediation model , 2010 .

[9]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  Effects of Autonomy, Traffic Conditions and Driver Personality Traits on Attitudes and Trust towards In-Vehicle Agents , 2008, 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[10]  Todd A. Mooradian,et al.  Who Trusts? Personality, Trust and Knowledge Sharing , 2006 .

[11]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust , 2001, CHI.

[12]  David John Atkinson,et al.  Autonomous Agents and Human Interpersonal Trust: Can We Engineer a Human-Machine Social Interface for Trust? , 2013, AAAI Spring Symposium: Trust and Autonomous Systems.

[13]  Joanna Lumsden,et al.  How does personality affect trust in B2C e-commerce? , 2006, ICEC '06.

[14]  B. Aubert,et al.  Further Understanding of Trust and Performance in Virtual Teams , 2003 .

[15]  John A. Johnson,et al.  The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures ☆ , 2006 .

[16]  Robert Michael Young,et al.  Toward a Computational Model for the Automatic Generation of Character Personality in Interactive Narrative , 2012, IVA.

[17]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  Trust in virtual teams: solved or still a mystery? , 2009, DATB.

[18]  Yasser A. El-Kassrawy.  The Impact of Trust on Virtual Team Effectiveness , 2014, Int. J. Online Mark..

[19]  Benjamin Lok,et al.  Virtual Human Personality Masks: A Human Computation Approach to Modeling Verbal Personalities in Virtual Humans , 2012, IVA.

[20]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[21]  P. Curșeu,et al.  Does conflict shatter trust or does trust obliterate conflict? Revisiting the relationships between team diversity, conflict, and trust , 2010 .

[22]  Marc H. Anderson.  The role of group personality composition in the emergence of task and relationship conflict within groups , 2009, Journal of Management & Organization.

[23]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  How Our Personality Shapes Our Interactions with Virtual Characters - Implications for Research and Development , 2010, IVA.

[24]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Principles of trust for MAS: cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification , 1998, Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (Cat. No.98EX160).

[25]  Eean R. Crawford,et al.  A review of research on personality in teams: Accounting for pathways spanning levels of theory and analysis , 2011 .

[26]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Virtual Team Trust: Instrument Development and Validation in an IS Educational Environment , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[27]  A. Todorov,et al.  The functional basis of face evaluation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Johan F. Hoorn,et al.  Why Fat Interface Characters Are Better e-Health Advisors , 2006, IVA.

[29]  Paolo Petta,et al.  The intermediary agent's brain: supporting learning to collaborate at the inter-personal level , 2008, AAMAS.

[30]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Trust me, I'm accountable: trust and accountability online , 1999, CHI EA '99.

[31]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[32]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Evaluating perceived trust from procedurally animated gaze , 2013, MIG.

[33]  Deborah Richards,et al.  A Human-Agent Teamwork Communication Model (HAT-COM) for collaborative activity in virtual learning environments , 2013 .

[34]  Deborah Richards,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of the Human-Agent Teamwork Communication Model (HAT-CoM) on the Development of a Shared Mental Model , 2013, PRIMA.

[35]  Audun Jøsang,et al.  Analysing the Relationship between Risk and Trust , 2004, iTrust.

[36]  R. Dalal,et al.  Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  Yucui Guo,et al.  A Trust Management Model Based on Reputation for Virtual Community , 2011 .

[38]  M. Deutsch,et al.  Trust, trustworthiness, and the F scale. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[39]  S. Drucker,et al.  The Role of Eye Gaze in Avatar Mediated Conversational Interfaces , 2000 .

[40]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[41]  J. Nilles.  Managing Telework: Strategies for Managing the Virtual Workforce , 1998 .

[42]  Michael Neff,et al.  Evaluating the Effect of Gesture and Language on Personality Perception in Conversational Agents , 2010, IVA.

[43]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Trust and reputation model in peer-to-peer networks , 2003, Proceedings Third International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P2003).

[44]  Flávio S. Corrêa da Silva,et al.  A Computer Architecture for Intelligent Agents with Personality and Emotions , 2012, Human-Computer Interaction: The Agency Perspective.

[45]  A. Evans,et al.  Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust , 2008 .

[46]  L. Wrightsman,et al.  Personality and attitudinal correlates of trusting and trustworthy behaviors in a two-person game. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  Fabrice Vienne,et al.  Trust and the use of adaptive cruise control: a study of a cut-in situation , 2006, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[48]  Anthony Steed,et al.  Comparing flat and spherical displays in a trust scenario in avatar-mediated interaction , 2014, CHI.

[49]  Matthew S. Prewett,et al.  The Team Personality–Team Performance Relationship Revisited: The Impact of Criterion Choice, Pattern of Workflow, and Method of Aggregation , 2009 .

[50]  Bennett E. Postlethwaite,et al.  Ready to rumble: how team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[51]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Antecedents of trust in human-robot collaborations , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA).

[52]  C. Castelfranchi,et al.  Social Trust : A Cognitive Approach , 2000 .