Accounting History: Definition and Relevance

This paper defines and relates contemporary applications of accounting history and is intended to assist scholars who do not specialize in historical study. A definitional distinction is drawn between history as a social science, with an emphasis on interpretation, criticism, and method, and history as a descriptive narrative form. Arguments are presented for the relevance of published accounting history studies to accounting pedagogy, policy and practice. The inherent limitations of historical inquiry are also explored. An appendix provides information on accounting history organizations, publications, and activities worldwide. A related paper which develops an accounting historiography will appear in a later issue of this journal.

[1]  M. Stone.  THE PENSION ACCOUNTING MYTH , 1984 .

[2]  G. Gutting.  The archaeology of knowledge , 1989 .

[3]  L. W. Hein.  The British Companies Acts and the Practice of Accountancy: 1844-1962 , 1978 .

[4]  W. Samson.  THE NINETEENTH CENTURY INCOME TAX IN THE SOUTH , 1985 .

[5]  Ernest Stevelinck.  THE MANY FACES OF LUCA PACIOLI: ICONOGRAPHIC RESEARCH OVER THIRTY YEARS* , 1986 .

[6]  P. Standish.  Origins of the Plan Comptable Général: A Study in Cultural Intrusion and Reaction , 1990 .

[7]  SEARCHING FOR ACCOUNTING PARADIGMS , 1983 .

[8]  Robert S. Kaplan,et al.  The evolution of management accounting , 1984 .

[9]  Joel Demski.  Accounting research: 1985* , 1985 .

[10]  S. Zeff.  Recent trends in accounting education and research in the USA: Some implications for UK academics☆ , 1989 .

[11]  R. Ashton.  The Royal Mail Case: A Legal Analysis , 1986 .

[12]  B. Wilson.  Sociological Methods in the Study of History , 1971, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society.

[13]  G. Whittred.  The Evolution of Consolidated Financial Reporting in Australia , 1986 .

[14]  L. S. King.  Clio and the doctors. Psycho-history, quanto-history and history , 1975, Medical History.

[15]  W. T. Andrews.  THE EVOLUTION OF APB OPINION NO. 17 ACCOUNTING FOR INTANGlBLE ASSETS; A STUDY OF THE U.S POSITION ON ACCOUNTING FOR GOODWILL , 1981 .

[16]  The classical model of control in the accounting literature: 1900-1979 , 1986 .

[17]  R. J. Chambers.  Usefulness—The Vanishing Premise in Accounting Standard Setting , 1979 .

[18]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[19]  Richard P. Brief.  The Late nineteenth century debate over depreciation, capital, and income , 1976 .

[20]  P. Mathias,et al.  Accountancy and the British economy, 1840-1980: The evolution of Ernst & Whinney , 1981 .

[21]  S. Zeff.  Big Eight Firms and the Accounting Literature: The Falloff in Advocacy Writing , 1986 .

[22]  Jacques Barzun,et al.  The modern researcher , 1978, Medical History.

[23]  Michael Chatfield.  A history of accounting thought , 1977 .

[24]  G. Previts.  FRAMEWORKS OF AMERICAN FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING THOUGHT: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE TO 1973 , 1984 .