The Gap effect for spatially oriented responses.

The gap effect refers to the finding that a temporal gap between fixation point offset and target onset typically results in shorter saccadic latencies than if the fixation point remains on. Recently, this gap effect was found for aimed hand movements as well as saccadic eye movements, but not for simple keypress responses. In order to examine the hypothesis that the hand gap effect occurs for different types of spatially oriented movements, two experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, subjects produced spatially oriented responses to a peripheral target and the target location was known in advance of the targets presentation. This spatially oriented detection task yielded gap effects for both eye and hand responses. In the second experiment, the duration of the temporal gap was varied between 0-400 ms. The duration of the temporal gap had similar effects on the magnitudes of both the eye and hand gap effects, suggesting that a common mechanism may underlie the gap effect for saccadic and manual pointing movements. Overall, the results of the present experiments confirm the finding of a gap effect for spatially oriented hand movements and suggest that this effect may be related to the functioning of the superior colliculus.

[1]  L B Stelmach,et al.  Viewing behavior: Ocular and attentional disengagement , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. II. Reversible activation and deactivation. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The effect of frontal eye field and superior colliculus lesions on saccadic latencies in the rhesus monkey. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Syoichi Iwasaki.  Facilitation of reaction times with GAP paradigm: comparison of manual and saccadic responses , 1990 .

[5]  H. Bekkering,et al.  The gap effect for eye and hand movements , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  The reduction of saccadic latency by prior offset of the fixation point: An analysis of the gap effect , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  W. J. Tam,et al.  Fixation disengagement and eye-movement latency , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  W. Werner,et al.  Neurons in the Primate Superior Colliculus are Active Before and During Arm Movements to Visual Targets , 1993, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  W. Fries.  Cortical projections to the superior colliculus in the macaque monkey: A retrograde study using horseradish peroxidase , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  R A Abrams,et al.  Fixation point offsets facilitate endogenous saccades , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  R. Klein,et al.  What are human express saccades? , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Visual offsets facilitate saccadic latency: Does predisengagement of visuospatial attention mediate this gap effect? , 1993 .

[13]  M G Saslow,et al.  Latency for saccadic eye movement. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Role of the rostral superior colliculus in active visual fixation and execution of express saccades. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  W. Fries.  Inputs from motor and premotor cortex to the superior colliculus of the macaque monkey , 1985, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  The Magnitude of the Fixation Offset Effect with Endogenously and Exogenously Controlled Saccades , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.