Item Nonresponse in Organizational Surveys

Nonrandom missing data can distort estimates of substantive relationships. In elaborating this principle for organizational research, we first develop a theoretical expectation that missing data in organizational surveys will normally be nonrandom relative to important organizational characteristics. We summarize empirical findings from a previous paper that demonstrate that unit nonresponse is a predictable outcome of organizational processes. Next, we examine expectations about organizational processes and item nonresponse and find that nonresponse is systematically associated with variables that tap organizational authority, capacity and motive to respond. In light of thesefindings, we develop suggestions for future organizational survey design to minimize missing data problems. We also outline approaches for analyses of organizational data in the presence of selection biases associated with unit and item nonresponse.

[1]  P. Wright The Social Psychology of Organizations, (2nd Ed): Daniel Katz and Robert L. Kahn New York: Wiley, 1978, 838 pp. , 1979 .

[2]  Christopher Winship,et al.  Models for Sample Selection Bias , 1992 .

[3]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Comparing Organizational Sampling Frames , 1990 .

[4]  J. Child Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[5]  C. Perrow Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[6]  J. Sedransk,et al.  Effect on Secondary Data Analysis of Common Imputation Methods , 1989 .

[7]  D. Rubin,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys , 1989 .

[8]  Robert L. Kaufman,et al.  Going up the Ladder: Multiplicity Sampling to Create Linked Macro-to-Micro Organizational Samples , 1991 .

[9]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 1988 .

[10]  Alexander Basilevsky,et al.  Chapter 12 – Missing Data: A Review of the Literature , 1983 .

[11]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[12]  D. O'Rourke,et al.  Designing and Implementing the National Organizations Study , 1994 .

[13]  L. Kish,et al.  SAMPLING ORGANIZATIONS AND GROUPS OF UNEQUAL SIZES. , 1965, American sociological review.

[14]  A. Kalleberg,et al.  A Methodological Comment on "Economic Segmentation, Worker Power, and Income Inequality" , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  D. Dillman Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[16]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[17]  David Barron,et al.  The Analysis of Count Data: Over-dispersion and Autocorrelation , 1992 .

[18]  K. Leicht,et al.  Measuring the same concepts across diverse organizations , 1992 .

[19]  Ronald A. Dye,et al.  Proprietary and Nonproprietary Disclosures , 1986 .

[20]  J. Goyder,et al.  The Silent Minority: Nonrespondents on Sample Surveys. , 1989 .

[21]  Donald Tomaskovic-Devey,et al.  Organizational Survey Nonresponse , 1994 .

[22]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Measurement errors in surveys , 1993 .

[23]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[24]  Kim S. Cameron,et al.  Coffin nails and corporate strategies , 1982 .