North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2015–2016
暂无分享,去创建一个
E. Warshaw | H. Maibach | J. Fowler | V. Deleo | James S. Taylor | J. Marks | J. DeKoven | D. Belsito | K. Zug | D. Sasseville | M. Zirwas | M. Pratt | C. T. Mathias | H. Maibach | Donald V. Belsito | C. Mathias
[1] E. Warshaw,et al. Epidemiology of nickel sensitivity: Retrospective cross‐sectional analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data 1994‐2014 , 2019, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
[2] M. Pastor-Nieto,et al. Non‐occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by long‐lasting nail polish kits for home use: ‘the tip of the iceberg’ , 2018, Contact dermatitis.
[3] T. Agner,et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by nail acrylates in Europe. An EECDRG study , 2018, Contact dermatitis.
[4] W. Uter,et al. European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA): results with the European baseline series, 2013/14 , 2017, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.
[5] R. Urwin,et al. Methylisothiazolinone: the epidemic is declining – but not gone , 2017, Contact dermatitis.
[6] E. Warshaw,et al. Epidemic of Isothiazolinone Allergy in North America: Prevalence Data From the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2013–2014 , 2017, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[7] D. Holness,et al. (Meth)Acrylate Occupational Contact Dermatitis in Nail Salon Workers: A Case Series , 2017, Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery.
[8] E. Warshaw,et al. American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergen Series: 2017 Update. , 2017, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[9] E. Warshaw,et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results 2013–2014 , 2000, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[10] I. White,et al. The burden of allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylates , 2016, Contact dermatitis.
[11] A. Spencer,et al. Acrylate and methacrylate contact allergy and allergic contact disease: a 13‐year review , 2016, Contact dermatitis.
[12] B. Berne,et al. Several cases of undesirable effects caused by methacrylate ultraviolet‐curing nail polish for non‐professional use , 2016, Contact dermatitis.
[13] S. Stocks,et al. Contact allergy resulting from the use of acrylate nails is increasing in both users and those who are occupationally exposed , 2016, Contact dermatitis.
[14] J. Geier,et al. Contact allergy to acrylates and methacrylates in consumers and nail artists – data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology, 2004–2013 , 2015, Contact dermatitis.
[15] E. Warshaw,et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2011–2012 , 2015, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[16] M. Bruze,et al. Swedish Experiences From Patch Testing Methylisothiazolinone Separately. , 2015, Acta dermato-venereologica.
[17] E. Warshaw,et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2009 to 2010 , 2013, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[18] E. Warshaw,et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results for 2007–2008 , 2013, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[19] H. Maibach,et al. Patch testing with 2.0% (0.60 mg/cm2) formaldehyde instead of 1.0% (0.30 mg/cm2) detects significantly more contact allergy , 2013, Contact dermatitis.
[20] E. Warshaw,et al. American contact dermatitis society core allergen series. , 2013, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[21] P. Frosch,et al. The ‘overall yield’ with the baseline series – a useful addition to the array of MOAHLFA factors describing departmental characteristics of patch tested patients , 2011, Contact dermatitis.
[22] E. Warshaw,et al. Positivity Ratio and Reaction Index: Patch‐Test Quality‐Control Metrics Applied to the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Database , 2010, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[23] E. Warshaw,et al. Patch‐Test Results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005‐2006 , 2009, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[24] E. Warshaw,et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch‐Test Results, 2003‐2004 Study Period , 2008, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[25] L. Kiemeney,et al. Relevance of Positive Patch‐Test Reactions to Fragrance Mix , 2008, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[26] J. Fowler,et al. Skin Reactions to Pimecrolimus Cream 1% in Patients Allergic to Propylene Glycol: A Double‐Blind Randomized Study , 2007, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[27] H. Maibach,et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch‐Test Results, 2001‐2002 Study Period , 2004, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[28] O. Gefeller,et al. Guidelines for the descriptive presentation and statistical analysis of contact allergy data , 2004, Contact dermatitis.
[29] H. Maibach,et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000 , 2003 .
[30] J. S. Taylor,et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1996-1998. , 2000, Archives of dermatology.
[31] S. Feldman,et al. Significance-prevalence index number: a reinterpretation and enhancement of data from the North American contact dermatitis group. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.